Advantage And Weaknesses Of Written Communication

Face-to-face communication contribute to the successfully communication as well. Rick et al. (2009) found that because face-to-face communication is produced in real time, speakers have direct feedback on how their message is being understood as it is being delivered. In our discussion group, our entire group members insist of having group meeting in campus everyday contributed to the success of the discussion most. Face-to-face communication is able to make sure that each of us merely focuses on our discussion in the particular time. Despite the fact that face to face communication

1. written messages do not have to be delivered on the spur of the moment as they can be edited and revised several times before they are sent so that the content can be shaped to maximum effect 2. written communication provides a permanent record

Written communication is used in any work setting but it is mainly used in the service

Face to face is also an easy form of communication because a lot of the times it is a conversation that has been struck up between two individuals as there are no other items needed such as a cell phone, computer, pencil, paper, T.V, and the radio. Also when you are face to face it is instant questions and answers rather than waiting on it from one of the other forms of communication. You also can pick up on people’s body language and tone in their voice to know and understand how important, serious, or relaxed one is

The most difficult aspect of testifying is having stage fright. Some officers and or people are not comfortable with speaking out loud and clear for all to hear in a public courtroom setting. Not only must the person testifying have to go through a direct examination but also a cross examination where it is intended to destroy the person's credibility.

Face-to-face discussions are the foundation of human communication; once established, it allows us to build trust, clearly articulate our ideas and minimize misunderstanding.

Unit 7 Writing: Use of Technology for Conversations 1. I personally would rather have a conversation with someone in person. I like being able to focus on the person I am talking to and see their facial reactions to what I am saying. If I can’t see their face, I feel like I am lacking the ability to fully listen to everything they have to say. In person I can also see if the person I’m having a conversation with is listening to me as well.

Face to face relationships are very important because through contact we are getting live interaction, trust, honesty, and integrity. Face to face conversations are more positive and more reliable than friendships online. In cyber space you convers ate with friends but some will not acknowledge the friendship in public. Social media is slowly taking away from face to face relationships, because we contact our family and friends on the computer screen. We are typing while looking at the screen instead of seeing facial expressions. Therefore, we aren’t sure if they are interpreting what we are saying in a negative or positive way.

You get to see people, hear them and judge their body language to see if they have understood what is being said.

The way to prevent these challenges is to have a communication plan in place before the implementation i.e. during the planning phase. During scope planning, when the WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) is created, the resources or stakeholders for each task are created. At the same time, a communication plan needs to be created to ensure communication with these stakeholders about meetings, status updates, etc.

Communication is one of the most important and valuable skills we have developed as human beings. It is the basis for how we connect with each other globally and shape the people we are today. Without effective communication, we would not be able to build productive relationships, express our cultural values, or most importantly, voice our thoughts. As we grow, we learn and develop our unique form of communication. Whether we are strong public speakers or prefer an interpersonal approach, it is important to find what type of communication is best suited for us, so we can appropriately and effectively use communication to our advantage. There are several different aspects that make us effective communicators, and knowing our strengths and weaknesses in theses categories will give us a comparative advantage on how to properly communicate on an interpersonal level. In this paper, I will discover the type of communicator I am, what I am good at, and what I can work on, to become an excellent interpersonal communicator.

Written communications could be through mail, email, fax, emails allow communication between two parties quickly, Written communication allows for time to respond clearly and factually

Why was the message that was sent to me in all caps? Is that a way of showing anger? Many get emails or texts or any forms of messages through electronic communication and have no idea what the message is saying or how their tone of voice is. Many have kids who just started using communication or haven’t started at all, and are wondering what to teach their kids about communication. The best solution to this problem is to teach using face to face communication. In the old days, talking face to face was the way to go. They would walk or drive somewhere and meet up just to have a conversation. Now a day we rely on electronics. Even though sending emails is easy, talking face to face helps understand people in a more formal manner. Are these

What are some possible reasons for Todd’s parents not attending the conference, answering the phone message, or acknowledging Julie’s written communication?

For the greatest success of the business, employees need interpersonal communication to connect with their co-workers. A leadership expert, John C. Maxwell (2010) says: “Connecting goes beyond words.” (p. 41). Physically being in the same room, verbally speaking thoughts, engaging in eye contact, and being able to see nonverbal responses are all important and add to a person’s understanding of the message being communicated and feeling a connection. Overall, communicating face-to-face is more natural for employees. An employee knows who is hearing what they are saying and seeing their nonverbal gestures. The employee can either get immediate feedback whether or not the person understands or agrees or disagrees. The communication does not have to be formatted as it does on paper. An employee should still present themselves professionally, but communicating face-to-face is a process, instead of format.