Advantages And Disadvantages Of Alternative Education: Magnet Schools

3. The author compares today’s school system to that of the past, which concerned itself with teaching students,

The author compares today’s school system to that of the past, which concerned itself with teaching students,

In addition, “the selective admissions criteria of magnets create firewalls for students with failing grades or records of bad behavior or truancy who want to attend these schools” (esc.org).

Some people might like education, others might dread it and really don’t see a reason to continue learning about it. Today, for teachers and professors it’s easy to them to tell how the education they teach is effective for an individual student. As we know, education is being taught at school, home, and a little of both. For America today, most children attend preschool, kindergarten, elementary, middle school, high school, and college. Depending on the pupil's career choice, it can take up to 20 or more years completing their schooling system, Usually, during the middle and or high school years in America, professors teach you valid things pupils will be using in life.

There are many controversies that American public education system does more harm than good. In “Against School” by John Taylor Gatto and “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” by Jean Anyon, explains how school education destructively impacts us. Gatto states his experience as a public school teacher and why he “just can't-do it anymore”. He was tired how the schooling was programmed. He argues how school system are affecting students to be more like “childlike” citizens. Also, Anyon demonstrates her research on how there are many different kinds of education depending what “class” you were. She informs us that there is an inequality in “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work”. She tells us that this difference in

Consequently, I questioned whether the alternative education system adequately prepares these students for the modern world. Likewise, I have doubts that the DL system is superior to the traditional education system, as Caesar suggests. Onward, she mentions how the alternative system is cheaper and more inclusive, but there was no numerical evidence to support this claim. Personally, I believe the DL system may be too lenient because some youths need structure in their lives because routines can provide stability and thus motivations and incentives to succeed. Plus, the alternative education system does not reflect the real world consisting of flexible and changing market demands and emerging innovations. Thus, I believe students must adapt to a fixed system by finding pathways to make a system work for them, rather than already being handed a purified system. Nevertheless, I believe the existence of both systems is ideal because the DL system is still highly effective for a certain group of students, but a single education system can never be an optimal fit for every student as we all learn

In today's world violence, chaos, and death has become too common and too redundant. It seems as though every day there is a new story in the newspaper about police brutality , the corruptions of society , and civil wars within developing countries. Despite the fact that we can easily look up information about the daily traditions and values of different cultures around the world we fail to do so. The lack of knowledge about other people and societies ,besides our own, causes a shallow understanding of why people do the things we hear and see in the headlines. This magnet school appeals to me because I believe learning about the world's customs will help me in my future goals to become a journalist.

When schooling was first created in the US, there were not nearly as many rules. One-room schoolhouses where there were all different kinds of ages and education levels were the norm, and the type of education that was given to students was far different than what they receive today. As education developed and various needs came to light, larger schools were built and students were segregated based on criteria such as age. Separate schooling based on learning ability (special education) was something that came later, but it was eventually developed. The system that is available today is working well in many cases, but there are areas in which it is still failing the students - mainly because there are still too many countries getting ahead of the US in areas such as science and mathematics (Darling-Hammond, 2001; Figlio, 2002). Until the US takes back the number one spot, today's students will be at a disadvantage based on what they are learning and how they can put that education to use in the job market (Collins, 1999; Darling-Hammond, 2001).

Alternative schooling is an educational establishment that has a curriculum or ways of teaching that are non traditional such as a wide range of teaching styles. An alternative school can be either private or even public (i.e. charter, online and magnet schools). Some of these schools aren't offered in some school districts, while some like magnet, charter and online schools are usually completely online. This usually happens if the school district or state that a student is currently living in doesn’t have the proper funding to build an alternative schooling location. Some alternative schools may offer classes at night, which is helpful for students who work. Along with that some of alternative schools have flexible graduation requirements and give students the choice in what classes they want to take apposed to regular schools where you really don't have so much of a say in your classes.

There is one thing that a lot of public schools do very well is make them magnet schools for arts, drama and science but they never come

Within the past few months, many people will most likely have noticed that Betsy Devos has made a big deal out of school choice. So the question arises; does school choice lead to better public schools overall? This is an important topic to talk about because it is a hot topic in the political climate; thus, our predictions could define the future of the United States. As a student attending public school, I have experience with school choice in America; therefore, I can properly judge the benefits of school choice. School choice leads to a better quality education because it drives schools to improve their curriculum so that they can compete with the private sectors for students, it improves the curriculum when correctly regulated, and it promotes strong attributes in schools such as diversity. First, school choice drives schools to improve their curriculum. As schools lose students to private sectors with a better curriculum, they will have no choice but to improve so that they can keep students. Second, school choice works when correctly regulated. If schools are equally accounted for, and they are properly funded, then the option of school choice could improve school curriculum. Finally, school choice can promote strong attributes such as diversity. In cities like Washington D.C, it is clear that school choice has helped schools be diverse. Insert transition here.

In the book “Social Problems: Continuity and Change”, I studied the chapter Schools and Education. This chapter is very informative on the different social problems that are occurring within schools and education in the United States. The chapter begins with the definition of education, briefly explaining how it is a social establishment that teaches people skills, knowledge, norms, and values that will be beneficial in today society. There are two different types of education. They are formal education and informal education. Teachers, through professional training, often teach formal education to students whereas informal education can occur anywhere, mainly in homes by parents or guardians.

I cannot write this essay without reference to study of my own experienced and my daughter’s- placed in the harsh environment of the government schooling system and its observations of the stark belief systems of “the child to fit the system” and not “the system to fit the child” with reference to the what education should be about. This means different things to different people. To some this means a teacher teaching and passive learning taking place, the outcome is expected at the end of each year that each child has to achieve the same outcome and is graded accordingly.

School has changed tremendously over time. School was a lot different back then than it is today. Going to school was not offered to everyone. It was only offered to the upper-class. Boys and girls were schooled separately, but today our schools are diverse and have many different kinds of races. Technology did not even exist a hundred years ago, but today, we use technology everyday in our school work. Through the course of history, education usually matched the needs of society until recently where a gap has occurred between high school and the real world in what skills and content is taught versus what is needed.

Traditional and alternative high schools are just two of the many ways a student can earn a high school diploma. Both options are public and usually consist of the same requirements for graduation. An alternative high school is defined by dictionary.com as “A school with an educational setting designed to accommodate educational, behavioral, and/or medical needs of children and adolescents that cannot be adequately addressed in a traditional school environment.” When a student is choosing a high school there are many factors they might consider; one should first create their own ideals for a high school experience before choosing. While traditional and alternative high schools have some similarities, differences are more evident based on three main categories: education style, student populace, and possible opportunities.