Advantages And Disadvantages Of Athens A Direct Democracy

But the biggest benefit of a direct democracy is that the people actually get a say instead of appointing a representative and hoping that the representatives won’t end up being close minded to the needs of all the people. Also, because the people will actually get a say, then there won’t always be complaints that someone didn’t get a voice. Of course there will still be people who are unhappy, but this is to be expected in a democratic system. A direct democracy dismantles almost all of the other

There will always be conflicting viewpoints between the citizens of whom are governed by the same people regardless of the type of government being discussed. There are many contrasting views on Athenian democracy; however, some of the strength’s and weaknesses present in Athenian democracy hold similarities to the democracy we are today. “Our constitution does not copy the laws of neighboring states; we are rather a pattern to others than imitators ourselves,” (68). Pericles (ca. 495-429 B.C.E.) was a famous Athenian figure and political leader who wrote the speech called, “Pericles’ Funeral Oration,” to honor the fallen soldiers. A large piece of his speech was used to praise the Athenian democratic constitution.

I don't believe that Athens is truly a democracy. The way it was governed by only men proves my point that it wasn't a democracy. A Council of 500 citizens would make and debate on all the laws and decisions in Athens. That sounds like a good idea, but the Council of 500 is all men! Yes it’s a step forward in democracy but there is a lean in the way of the view of men and no view of a woman's perspective.

Direct democracy preceded its counterpart and originated in the city-state Athens, Greece around 508 B.C.E. It was established by Cleisthenes. As far as historians can currently tell, it was the world’s first working democracy. Nevertheless, problems still arouse, and it ultimately failed. It was found that direct democracy is only effective when applied to a small population. Another problem was that it was impractical to have every citizen vote on every issue in a country. The Greeks in Athens came up with a system where several hundred citizens were randomly chosen daily by a device called kleroterion to make decisions for the city on that day. This eventually led to the development of representative

Ancient Athens was not truly democratic because out of the 240,235 Total Population only 12% were able to vote. rule was exercised directly by the people, whereas democratic means government by representatives of the people. it was not democratic because in order to become a citizen a council of 500 voted on

In Doc D, paragraph two, While in the Doc C chart it explains that Ancient Athens was democratic because according to the article,”It is more democratic by being government by the people instead of government by those elected by the people.” But on the other hand it’s less democratic because of “narrowing down the concept of demos to mean the adult male

Have you ever heard of Athens and the first democracy, well I have been studying it for a few months. After studying Athens widespread forms of government and it’s so called democracy, I have come to a conclusion that Athens wasn’t truly democratic for many textual reasons. Here's why

There are other reasons why Athens is truly not a democracy. They did not let women, children of citizens, metics, and slaves vote. This was made up of 88% or 210,335 of the population (Document C). Demokratia was ruled by male citizens only, excluding minors and women, free foreigners

People may say Athens was not a democracy because of the fact that only 12% of the population could vote. Although, if you look at the definition of democracy, it says, “all the eligible members of state.” In Athens, the eligible members of state were any citizens that were men. It may also be argued that because they had slaves,

Athens and Sparta were two powerful city-states, different from each other where Athenian democracy focused on economic advancement, while Sparta oligarchy focused on military force. Democracy is a system of government where citizens have the right to vote, whereas oligarchy is a system of government where only a group of people is in control and only their opinion or decision that were taken into consideration. Leading to the thesis statement that people are better served by Athenian democracy than the Spartan oligarchy, supported in three evidence points. Firstly, Athenian democracy allowed citizens participation in government that gave them freedom to vote and take part in legislation. Secondly, the Athenian government provided Athenian men better education, by being taught how to read and write to reach their academic advancement. Lastly, the Athenian democracy’s contribution to Athens military advancement that protected its citizens.

There would be no improvement in the country if there was no democracy. I think that is it very important to have one because a country cannot thrive if others opinions are not adhered. Democracy is really what you put into it

In a direct democracy, all the citizens could vote for every single issue. Athens’ direct democracy allowed each citizen to take part in the city’s government. Every ten days, the citizens who wanted to vote would gather on a hill. There, the men debated on issues, voted on laws, and listened to others speak their opinions (Frey 285). Since all citizens could participate in the Athenian government, there were a lot of different perspectives on the same issue.

Direct democracy is supposed to promote a cooperative community, people have the power to speak for their opinions. It promotes civic involvement and a meaningful society where informed decisions are not just made by the government but by the public as well. The citizens are able to learn the important information they need in order to understand issues of the government and laws that are implemented. In a direct democracy the people are able to feel that their voice matters and that if the majority of the public is against a law or feels that a person in office is not living up to what they said, they have the right to either fix the law or remove the person from office. This feeling of a voice makes the public more willing to get involved and care about the

People who are born in the direct or pure democracy have a direct say in laws, choices, and issues that affect them or they have a problem with.

Finally, democracy is the best form of government thus far because it is susceptible to change. The role of high courts, and equal rights makes change possible. For example, if the majority impedes on a minority groups’ rights, over time, the legislature will adjust, enumerating those who were previously attacked. Overall, democracy makes the necessary refinements needed to keep up with societal developments.