Advantages And Disadvantages Of Dictatorship

Many countries in the world have democracies, but there are still some where there is a dictatorship. In a dictatorship, nobody is free or safe and nobody will

Did you know that most dictators come to power by force? They eliminate their opponent and then they are sworn in as the dictator. The people of that country do not have many rights. The dictator is allowed to do anything he/she wants. Dictatorship is a form of government where one person is in full control and the people of that country must do what the dictator says.

The first thing one should know about dictatorship is what laws the citizens have to follow. For example, in North Korea, citizens are not allowed to leave their country without the regime's permission. (The People's Challenges - Liberty in North Korea) Should North Koreans leave their country without permission, they are subject to many harsh punishments, which can include death. Also, if a North Korean is reported for criticising the regime, or North Korea’s Dictator, Kim Jong Un, the punishment would affect the whole family. (The People's Challenges - Liberty in North Korea) In

Power, could there be too much of it? Or not enough? In the wrong hands, too much power lead to millions of innocent lives being taken away. One of the world’s most famous dictators takes power and has control on whether you live or die. He may not like the color of your hair, skin or what you believe in and for that, the price you pay is your life.

Life to a dictator is dispensable. Dictators such as Adolf Hitler believed that “terrorism is an effective political tool”. People could be executed or tortured just for having a different opinion from their dictators, or for being of a different race [doc 5]. Hitler also said “already the boy in school must learn to be silent, not only when he is blamed justly but he has also to learn, if necessary, to bear injustice in silence,”… [Doc 8] This basically means that even if someone is wrongly accused of doing something they should just take the punishment and be executed or tortured rather than fight the police. Society was supposed to be submissive no matter what the circumstances were or be

A dictatorship is most common in alienated countries. Dictatorships impose certain ways of thinking unto their general population, censoring the media and possibly other forms of communications. Citizens are usually kept under close observation and certain

Dictatorship is a form of government in which the leader has absolute power and authority.

Which is why dictators usually reserve the right of overriding their parliaments, government and courts even though they designate power for most situations. It's also why dictatorships are far more efficient in crisis situations i.e. war, then democracies. (Separation of Powers)

A dictatorship is a form of government ruled by a single party or a single party of dictators. In this form of

Dictators are criticized because of the amount of power they possess. With complete power, they can implement any laws, even biased and unjust laws. The possibility of inequity causes fear and anger in citizens and in turn, leads to the criticism of a dictator.

Did they lose a war to North Korea or another country that turned to a dictator or oligarchy government, or did they just choose to be this way. I highly doubt that it came to be this way naturally unless a robot is the dictator because in the American constitution, the writers always talk about freedom and equal rights. The government could have also ignored the constitution because they wanted more control over the population. In a dictatorship, there obviously has to be a dictator, unless it is a monarchy. Another question is who is the dictator who run this system. Maybe the dictators are robots. That would make sense because to robots, humans are useless. They don’t understand the concept of life, because they do not have a real one. They can have AI, but they will never think, talk, or act like a human because they aren’t

The three dictators, Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini, and Adolf Hitler, had similarities and differences as to how they ruled during their times as leaders. Although they each had their share of followers, these men were violent, vicious, and would take down anyone or anything that got in their way. Each of the men, however, had several things about their rulings in common. These include how their totalitarian government flourished, the aspect of their totalitarian state politically, and the manner of their totalitarian state economically. Each dictator had their own way of fixing the government, but each was drawn towards a totalitarian state.

I am going to discuss a constitutional democracy form of government and a dictator form of government. We in America live under a constitutional democracy. First, a democracy, as most know is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). A constitutional democracy affords protections of the people from those elected to lead the government ensuring their rights are not violated (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). These protections come from the foundation of the created society and backed up by law (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). Unlike a dictatorship, our democracy may be overseen by those elected to power, however, the people ultimately retain that power (Constitutional Democracy, n.d.). In a way, there is a form of dictatorship in our

A dictatorship is a government ruled by one commander. An example of this is Iraq. Saddam Hussein is the dictator of Iraq. Whatever he decides becomes law. Dictatorships are similar to absolute monarchies in that they are very oppressive to the people of the country. The major difference between the two is that absolute monarchies are families inheriting their power while dictatorships often result from military takeovers or from an elected official who refuses to step down from his elected office.

Under an authoritarian regime, specifically a dictatorship, the ruler has the political and executive power to persecute an individual or group for political reasons, which demonstrates a form of political oppression.