Advantages And Disadvantages Of Driverless Car

To start with, driverless cars have lower crash rates than human drivers. Driverless cars strictly obey the laws of the road, so they stop for pedestrians, stop at red lights, and slow down when they are supposed to. When people drive, they don’t always obey the laws which causes them to get into more crashes. “94 percent of all serious crashes to human error” while driverless cars have only had fault in one accident. However, “a number of human-driven vehicles are at fault for hitting autonomous vehicles” because of the frequent stops when obeying the laws, but none of those crashes were serious.

On one hand, in the last couple of years, there are some criminal activities endanger passengers by Uber’s drivers (Picchi, 2014). Because of these horrible things happened not only let Uber company lost a lot customs but also bring shame on Uber company (Picchi, 2014). Even though Uber claims they are going to do more background checks for drivers, the background checks cannot include all the aspects for the drivers (Picchi, 2014). About driverless cars there also some problem regard to safety problem for example: villainous weather, puddles on the street (Boudette,

Imagine a future with zero car accidents and taking a nap while going down the road. Imagine a future where there are no drivers, only passengers. And not just that, but imagine not worrying about having accidents or high insurance payments. With driverless vehicles, car accidents will drastically diminish and insurance rates will decrease, meaning they could have a better impact on the economy. Driverless vehicles will benefit society given that they will reduce accidents, can improve traffic flow by enhancing its efficiency, and protect the environment from harmful fuel emissions.

Driverless cars work with radar sensors that are dotted around the car, letting you know how close things are or how far away. The radar sensors also monitir the postion of the surroundings of the vehicle. Lidar sensors help to detect the edges of roads and identify lane markings by bouncing pulses of light off the cars

First driverless cars are much less likely to crash. In fact “The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that between 93 percent and 95 percent of car accidents are caused by human error” (par. 5, Tribune). This study displays

The use of cars in the right state since the vehicles can accurately schedule repair and maintenance services from the data that is collected by the IoT. This offers general reduction in the accidents caused by the normal car failures. Small faults in vehicles are not easily detectible but with IoT technology in the vehicles the cars will always be in fault free condition (Umar et al., 2016).

In her article “To Hit the Road, Driverless Cars Must Be Safe, Not Perfect,” Nidhi Kalra argues that because humans are untrustworthy when it comes to safe driving, we should adapt to driverless cars. She provides three premises to support her argument. First, she presents the data of deaths and injuries that were caused by human mistakes. Second, she points out that even though driverless cars may never reach perfection, they would never make miscalculations or mistakes that human drivers make all the time, such as drunk driving, drowsy driving, or driving with distraction. Third, she argues that driverless cars offer benefits such as bettering mobility and efficiency, reducing congestion costs and land use. With these primary premises, Kalra persuades that driverless cars should hit the road one day to reduce amounts of accidents that are likely made by human drivers.

Driverless cars could easily double the cost of the car. With the amount of added technology that these cars will need the cost of the car will be significantly higher than the car that isn't driverless. The passage states," Google's Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS receiver, and an inertial motion sensor. " This shows the amount of expensive technology that is added to these cars. These cars, along with being practically pointless are also incredibly expensive.

Self driving cars should continue to be produced because, self driving cars are safer than humans at driving. Although it is true that if self driving vehicles took over, 1.7 million people would be out of a job involving commercial transportation; however, the safety of self driving cars outweighs the cons (Freedman). Driverless cars are a new way to advise car safety. It eliminates human error, and allows multiple cross checks to avoid a collision. This compares to just one quick decision by someone. Normal cars require people to make logical decisions to keep themselves safe. The idea about decisions is that a person can make bad ones. Computers are not like that; rather, they have a series of processes that monitor decisions being made. Self driving cars are mechanical which mean, that they have nothing to distract them. It is said by The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that 94% of crashes occur from human error. Taking out human error will reduce the number

“Ninety percent of our road accidents are related to bad driving behavior; driving recklessly and speeding under the influence of alcohol, changing lanes without signaling, driving on the hard shoulder and passing through red lights.” -Lt Gen Dahi Khalfan Commander in chief of the Dubai Police (Olarte, 2011). The majority of car crashes are caused by human errors, and if this proposition is implemented, the number of fatalities due to car accidents per year will dramatically plummet. In 2012, a Google driverless car had driven over 300,000 miles, with only two accidents being reported, both of which had been a human’s fault (Emerson, 2012). Autonomous cars will have quicker reflexes than humans, make more reliable judgments and will not commit silly mistakes such as texting whilst driving. As a collateral for reducing accidents, this innovation could theoretically also save the government trillions of dollars each year.

For people who live out of a city a driverless car would be the best thing cause you wouldn't be the one driving the car would do it for you. Some people would prefer to live further out of the city with driverless cars. It would make longer trips much better without taking stops for the driver to take a break.

Another advance feature of a driverless car is that one driverless car will know that another

Our future is intense and frightening, but overall, unpredictable. We will have driverless cars soon in our world. They will overtake our roads and means of transportation. In my opinion, I think there is both good and bad with these driverless cars. There is both pros and cons dealing with this future. This future for cars will reduce drunk driving, reduce traffic jams, and reduce expense on the driver and our planet. The downside however, will come with putting millions out of business. Driverless cars are technology, and technology is not perfect, it sometimes crashes and does not always work the way we want it to. We do know that humanity is not perfect either. Humanity makes mistakes just as much as technology. So in this essay, I will talk about perspective one, perspective two, and perspective three, all talking about how driverless cars are good and bad for the future of our world.

Despite remaining issues with technology, driverless cars should be allowed on the city streets. A car that drives itself sounds insane, but it could help thousands of people every day. Say you know someone who can’t get to places easily and is disabled, then they could use the driverless car to get to wherever they like. The driverless car is electric, which means the car is environmentally friendly and could decrease the amount of pollution. That isn’t the only thing that driverless car can provide, it is safer than most people on the road and you are most likely not to be involved in an accident. The driverless car can benefit a lot of people in need.

People that are blind could then have the ability to drive wherever they so choose. In addition, people who use a wheelchair every day could simply roll up to the car and go. Driverless cars would drastically cut traffic tickets in half. You would also have more time for other things while your car is driving you such as working on homework, talking on the phone, drinking coffee, and the list goes on and on.