The article, “The Promise of a Post-Driver Life” states, car accidents occur every day, leaving someone seriously injured about every seven-seconds and one dead about every fourteen minutes (Humas). Surprisingly, driverless vehicles are on the rise and people do not know how to react or what to think about them. While the number of accidents on the road has increased over the years. Driverless cars could be a solution to help to mend the problem and help eliminate driver errors. Some people believe we should have driverless vehicles while others say they would be too dangerous. Many people in the United States feel driverless cars can create a decrease in the number of accidents, create a better traffic flow, and create greater mobility for those who cannot drive, while others say it would be too hazardous with possible computer malfunctions, cyber attacks, and relying on algorithms to make ethical decisions.
Imagine a future with zero car accidents and taking a nap while going down the road. Imagine a future where there are no drivers, only passengers. And not just that, but imagine not worrying about having accidents or high insurance payments. With driverless vehicles, car accidents will drastically diminish and insurance rates will decrease, meaning they could have a better impact on the economy. Driverless vehicles will benefit society given that they will reduce accidents, can improve traffic flow by enhancing its efficiency, and protect the environment from harmful fuel emissions.
On one hand, in the last couple of years, there are some criminal activities endanger passengers by Uber’s drivers (Picchi, 2014). Because of these horrible things happened not only let Uber company lost a lot customs but also bring shame on Uber company (Picchi, 2014). Even though Uber claims they are going to do more background checks for drivers, the background checks cannot include all the aspects for the drivers (Picchi, 2014). About driverless cars there also some problem regard to safety problem for example: villainous weather, puddles on the street (Boudette,
First driverless cars are much less likely to crash. In fact “The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that between 93 percent and 95 percent of car accidents are caused by human error” (par. 5, Tribune). This study displays
In her article “To Hit the Road, Driverless Cars Must Be Safe, Not Perfect,” Nidhi Kalra argues that because humans are untrustworthy when it comes to safe driving, we should adapt to driverless cars. She provides three premises to support her argument. First, she presents the data of deaths and injuries that were caused by human mistakes. Second, she points out that even though driverless cars may never reach perfection, they would never make miscalculations or mistakes that human drivers make all the time, such as drunk driving, drowsy driving, or driving with distraction. Third, she argues that driverless cars offer benefits such as bettering mobility and efficiency, reducing congestion costs and land use. With these primary premises, Kalra persuades that driverless cars should hit the road one day to reduce amounts of accidents that are likely made by human drivers.
Driverless cars work with radar sensors that are dotted around the car, letting you know how close things are or how far away. The radar sensors also monitir the postion of the surroundings of the vehicle. Lidar sensors help to detect the edges of roads and identify lane markings by bouncing pulses of light off the cars
“Ninety percent of our road accidents are related to bad driving behavior; driving recklessly and speeding under the influence of alcohol, changing lanes without signaling, driving on the hard shoulder and passing through red lights.” -Lt Gen Dahi Khalfan Commander in chief of the Dubai Police (Olarte, 2011). The majority of car crashes are caused by human errors, and if this proposition is implemented, the number of fatalities due to car accidents per year will dramatically plummet. In 2012, a Google driverless car had driven over 300,000 miles, with only two accidents being reported, both of which had been a human’s fault (Emerson, 2012). Autonomous cars will have quicker reflexes than humans, make more reliable judgments and will not commit silly mistakes such as texting whilst driving. As a collateral for reducing accidents, this innovation could theoretically also save the government trillions of dollars each year.
People that are blind could then have the ability to drive wherever they so choose. In addition, people who use a wheelchair every day could simply roll up to the car and go. Driverless cars would drastically cut traffic tickets in half. You would also have more time for other things while your car is driving you such as working on homework, talking on the phone, drinking coffee, and the list goes on and on.
For people who live out of a city a driverless car would be the best thing cause you wouldn't be the one driving the car would do it for you. Some people would prefer to live further out of the city with driverless cars. It would make longer trips much better without taking stops for the driver to take a break.
The average human has an attention span of eight seconds. If one’s attention span is so little, it is much easier to not pay attention to driving and cause a fender bender. With driverless cars, you do not partake in worrying about paying attention or causing an accident. These types of cars bring better driving, which means fewer fatalities and accidents. Traffic jams would no longer exist, therefore people can get places easily and faster. Driverless cars bring various economic gains.
Not only will driverless vehicles save people money, but they will save lives in the process. According to ASIRT, a non-profit humanitarian organization that promotes road safety, 1.3 million people die from a car crash per year in the world, which is on average 3,287 per day (“Road Crash Statistics”). On top of that number, 20-50 million are disabled or injured per year, and car crashes are the ninth leading cause of death (“Road Crash Statistics”). The reason for these crashes could possibly be car troubles while driving, like the brakes not working or hitting a pothole, but the number one cause of crashes is being distracted. “According to one analysis, 4 million of the nearly 11 million crashes that occur annually could potentially be avoided if distractions were eliminated” (Pelini). Another study has shown that when typing or reading on a phone while driving adversely affects one’s stimulus detection time, reaction time, lane positioning, vehicle control, and increases the chance of a collision (Pelini). With the use of driverless vehicles people could be on their phones while driving and not be in any danger of crashing. Distracted drivers and even drunk drivers will be eliminated if driverless vehicles are implemented into society, it’s just a matter of time when they will become the social
Driverless cars could be super dangerous and put some people in harm. They are probably too expensive for an average U.S. citizen. It would be so many companies out of business and it would also ruin a nascar. Also what would the designs of the cars would be.
Our future is intense and frightening, but overall, unpredictable. We will have driverless cars soon in our world. They will overtake our roads and means of transportation. In my opinion, I think there is both good and bad with these driverless cars. There is both pros and cons dealing with this future. This future for cars will reduce drunk driving, reduce traffic jams, and reduce expense on the driver and our planet. The downside however, will come with putting millions out of business. Driverless cars are technology, and technology is not perfect, it sometimes crashes and does not always work the way we want it to. We do know that humanity is not perfect either. Humanity makes mistakes just as much as technology. So in this essay, I will talk about perspective one, perspective two, and perspective three, all talking about how driverless cars are good and bad for the future of our world.
Despite remaining issues with technology, driverless cars should be allowed on the city streets. A car that drives itself sounds insane, but it could help thousands of people every day. Say you know someone who can’t get to places easily and is disabled, then they could use the driverless car to get to wherever they like. The driverless car is electric, which means the car is environmentally friendly and could decrease the amount of pollution. That isn’t the only thing that driverless car can provide, it is safer than most people on the road and you are most likely not to be involved in an accident. The driverless car can benefit a lot of people in need.
The most obvious benefit of having a driverless car is the fact that people do not have to drive it most of the time. Also, since it is a hands-free type of thing, drivers have more freedom to do whatever they wish