The objective of this part is to analyze the reasons that can lead a firm to M&A operations. Neoclassical economists and strategy experts argue that it improves the competitive position of the firm by exploring the characteristics of the acquired business and its added value, while others are in favor of behavioral theories such as agency theories, hubris, and misvaluation. This part therefore presents the main motivations for merger transactions as well as the improvements that an M&A transaction provide. It is helpful to know why the other side (the seller) is planning to sell his business in a transaction. This knowledge should facilitate for both parties to impose it bargaining power and the structuring of proposals to meet financial, strategic, and personal objectives of the other part. The main common reasons may include: Common reasons of the seller Common reasons of the buyer · Need for additional capital to finance growth. · Low or declining growth or rising financial difficulties. · Presence of strategic disadvantages that cannot be overcome as standalone business. · Market or industry conditions that create …show more content…
Volume-effect-cost synergies are the reason most often cited in a business combination. They correspond to a decrease in the average unit cost of production associated with the quantity of products manufactured. Fusion thus appears to be an effective means to achieve this objective and to distribute fixed costs over a larger number of manufactured units. The size of the merged companies also makes it possible to meet efficiency criteria, by giving the purchaser the opportunity to reach a critical mass essential to his development. Indeed, economies of size are not just efficiency requirements, they can also contribute to business growth and
Becoming a larger more efficient company with a strengthening competitive position opens up the opportunity for more mergers and acquisitions of competitors, suppliers and/or customers.
Question 1 Several factors have been proposed as providing a rationale for mergers. Among the more prominent ones are (1) tax considerations, (2) diversification, (3)
In regards to acquisitions, it is important to distinguish between mergers and acquisitions. In a merger, two companies come together and create a new entity. In an acquisition, one company buys another one and manages it consistent with the acquirer’s needs. An acquisition that involves integration has greater staffing implications than one that involves separation (Rizvi, 2008). A combining of companies is a major change. Mergers and acquisitions represent the end of the gamut of options companies have in combining with each other. It is the mergers and acquisitions that are the combinations that have the greatest implications for size of investment, control, integration requirements, pains of separation, and people management issues
Mergers and acquisitions are a very important part of today’s corporate finance. It is seen as an important tool for the expansion of a company and to further its growth prospects. CEOs of big companies wish to actively participate in M&A processes to turn the enterprises into big conglomerates, thereby achieving profits and gains from the acquired firms in the future. M&A activities however involve a long and complicated procedure of decision-making and this process is fraught with a lot of biases. Empirical evidence has shown that most of the acquiring firms fail to reap the expected profits from M&A activities.
Eliminating competition: Merging allows companies to eliminate a future competition and gain a larger market share in their products market
Then in eighties, when the managers were not able to focus on the unrelated businesses, they went for de-conglomeration phase in which they sold of the unrelated SBUs so as to focus on the core businesses. The author discusses the framework of Corporate Acquisitions and discusses various types of acquisitions like Vertical, Horizontal, Product-Market Extension, and Unrelated Extension. The author further discuss the role of marketing in mergers and acquisitions as it is mentioned that marketing plays either direct role or a participative role in the decision making. For example, for customer service or product support, marketing plays a direct role in formulating strategic decision for the same.
Merger and acquisition is a corporate strategy entailing the selling, buying, and combining or dividing business entities in a bid to facilitate rapid recovery or growth. A merger is distinguished from an acquisition in the sense that an acquisition entails a take-over. A merger involves a combination of business assets of two companies forming an entirely new one ADDIN EN.CITE Mehnert2008259(Mehnert, 2008)2592596Mehnert, M.Negotiation: Definition and Types, Manager's Issues in Negotiation, Cultural Differences and the Negotiation Process2008Santa Cruz, CA 95060Hammer, Patrick, Tanja Hammer, Matthias Knoop, Julius Mittenzwei, Georg Steinbach u. Michael Teltscher. GRIN Verlag GbR9783640183234http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=CoeiECIdYUsC( HYPERLINK l "_ENREF_1" o "Mehnert, 2008 #259" Mehnert, 2008). In this paper Mergers, acquisition and international strategies are discussed looking at two companies: American Airlines Group Inc and American Media Inc. the paper discusses these companies looking at the strategies they have deployed in their operations and the possible gains for such strategies.
Today’s fast growing globalize economies and competition have forced industries to fine ways to survive in today’s perplexed business environment and generate profit for their shareholders. There are many methods to develop the organizations one of them is Mergers and Acquisitions. This is where strategies for success are developed by acquiring new companies or by the merger of two (P.Gaughan, 2000).
In recent times, merger and acquisition are considered as one of the important steps for strategic growth. A company can plan to merge or acquire another company if it thinks it is a good investment, or they will earn a sound investment from it. The primary goal of any company entering into merger or acquisition is to boost the shareholder wealth. From a financial perspective, merger is carried due to diversification. It is the process of reducing the risks through investment decisions. For example, many a times, a company is highly at risk since it has done enormous investment in one industry then it can intend to buy a business in another industry (Sky Plc, 1990). This is termed as acquisition and can be beneficial for the host country.
In theory, merging can bring about Synergy. The value of both the offeror’s company and the offeree’s together are of higher value compared to each of the two companies individually. Benefits may arise
While we know our country’s business history is filled with mergers and acquisitions over the decades, the reasons behind this M&A activity are less obvious. We should now address the real issue of why companies merge. 3
One key financial driver would be to gain new capital assets. Merging with another company is a faster and often a more inexpensive way to gain capital assets without building new facilities and hiring inexperienced staff. Merging allows you to gain
M&A can benefit companies in various ways and the main advantage is all the potential economies of scale that can arise from the deal (Pettinger, 2012). For example, the firm benefits from cost savings that are associated with marketing and technology.
While terms of merger either acquisition are commonly used to define a wide range of transactions, in fact, they are all different according to specific conditions of each. Therefore, researches distinguish M&A activity according to its nature. Amit R. (1989) classifies three main types of mergers on a basis of target firm’s nature: anticipated bankruptcy of a target firm; exceptional performance or high liquidity of a target; and target firm being a remainder of a greater one. However, this generalised classification is not widely adopted by researchers which rather prefer to employ a conventional classification or, to be more precise, they classify and sub-classify M&A by their perspectives.
Conglomerate Merger: Here companies are from different industries. Here the business or products are totally different, no way related. They merge their operations because that overlaps. This kind of merger leads to unification of different businesses from different industry and verticals under the umbrella of one brand or firm.