Advantages Of Agile Methods

Agile organizations are totally different than a bureaucratic organization. An agile organization which is known as a bottom-up empowerment organization, where managers give employees an opportunity in having a say in the design of rules of the organization. In an agile organization, managers see employees as equal as opposed to them being superior to one another. Rank is not important in an agile organization because managers empower their employees to make decisions that can affect the organization. However, it is very important that managers still exert control over their employees. Managers can do this by using objectives to exert the control. Managers give objectives or goals to their employees that allow the employees to do their job as they see fit in order to accomplish their goals. Managers are there to give direction, but the employees are the ones that decide on how they are going to achieve their goal.

In my opinion, the three papers provide us a very thorough understanding of Agile method compared with

In other words, how can PMO and agile live together in an organization? Therefore, the target of this paper is to address the issues and clarify the relationship between the PMO and Agile methodology.

There has been a lot said in the last few years about Agile project management methodologies, and I have found that the general feeling is that Agile although not perfect tends to provide better results in software development projects than waterfall and other methodologies. People tend to be very opinionated about it, and in my experience there three dominant positions about Agile: you either love it, hate it or you don’t care, in other words, you do not believe in methodologies at all, you think they are all a waste of time and effort.

From the hypothesis testing we can clearly see that implementation of agile technology increases the chances of success of the project and also decreases the cost of the project. But agile technology alone cannot make the project successful.

This paper describes Agile development methodologies and their benefits. Section II presents key elements of Agile. Section III presents benefits of Agile development methodologies over traditional waterfall methodologies.

One of the biggest obstacles to the government adopting the Agile method is an outdated procurement practice. To address the outdated system, the U.S. Digital Services (USDS) created a playbook with 13 key processes that focus on the end-users’ perspective. (Holler et al., 2014, para. 11).

One of the most prevalent approaches companies utilize today is Agile. The Agile approach was developed to mitigate many of the shortcomings of Waterfall. “The agile development

the employees of the organization. Each iteration has a time period defined with a set of goals.

This section establishes a theoretical foundation in relation to existing knowledge and theories regarding Agile development framework, Scrum, Integrated Product Development and Stage-Gate process model.

Agile is a member of software development mode. Actually It is not a technique. I think not only it is a methodology, but also it is a process of development software. It will show and guide us to finish the development step by step according to the project required. However this kind of development mode is driven by human. The human will control the direction of the project.

The Agile methodology (AM) for software development is an iterative system characterized by cycles of development, testing, and stakeholder feedback. According to Ferreira and Cohen, the Agile methodology has the following five characteristics (50):

The way that software is developed has been rapidly evolving over time, going through many iterations, one genre of which is Agile software development. The Agile Manifesto1 was published in 2001, however the ideas behind it have existed and used since the early 1970’s when E. A. Edmonds published a paper that introduced the idea of an adaptive software development process2. Then in the 1990’s there was a rapid evolution of software development processes. This lead to the creation of scrum in 1995, extreme programming in 1996 and feature-driven development in 1997. Though they were devised before the Agile Manifesto was created, they now all fall under Agile software development. Agile software development methods are generally considered much better than previous methods, such as the Waterfall method, though it is still considered to be in its early stages with many issues3.

Today’s world market is much faster. Every industry is now become the result orientated. They need results in quick time. Like any other industry IT industries also force to make the changes in concepts and techniques they were using traditionally. The traditional models like waterfall, Incremental model, RAID model are not useful for most of the current project requirement. Nowadays project requirements depend on many other unstable concepts, which make the project less predictable. Because of these entire unpredictable project, agile becomes the first choice of most of the clients. The agile software development methods are more adaptive approach, while conventional/traditional software development methods are predictive approach. In traditional method all the project development plan is created before starting the actual development. Once the designing is completed we can’t make changes. On the other hand an agile methodology has the provision to acquire such changes even after the coding is started. Agile relies more on the incremental, iterative development cycles. Agile methodology software is developed in the small periods. Agile is for the projects whose requirements are not fully discovered, projects where output is not predictable. This makes the agile methodology more suitable for the current market situation.

Agile methods also help teams meet the industry standards with less overheads than other software development methodologies because of the timeboxed iterations and the critical benefit here is that the entire project can easily adapt to even radical changes with much less costs.