According to Brunsman (1998), Berman (2007), Arrow (1969), there are few main points that can be highlighted about Mergers and Acquisitions:
• A Merger and an Acquisition are two different processes. The results can be similar in the end but the the ways the both processes work are different;
• Mergers or acquisitions are not always successful, sometimes they fail;
• Hostile vs. Friendly - An acquisition could be labeled “hostile” or “friendly.” This just refers to whether acquired shareholders of the company are on board with the transaction or not. Obviously, if they welcome, the transaction is friendly and if they oppose the transaction, it is considered hostile. It is important to remember though that if an acquisition labeled as a hostile, it doesn’t necessarily mean that it will be bad for the future of the company being acquired.
The following can be major benefits of mergers and acquisitions (Bertkovitch, 1993):
• Increased value is generated for
…show more content…
For example, Microsoft’s acquisition of Skype is a product acquisition. Then, some companies can be acquired for non-saleable assets. For instance, the asset can be anything, even simply a customer database or a media property. Another advantage that can be taken from going into acquisition is acquiring a new talent. Google is very famous for doing such kinds of acquisitions. This company by buying businesses is taking the most important from each organization. For instance, engineers or IT department, and afterward, destroy the parts of the bought company that they don’t need. Companies go through mergers and acquisitions for the target goal of improved financial performance for shareholders. Profit is the main aim of almost every organization, so at the end of the day, more money is always an objective and advantage from merger and acquisition
Merging with another organization has downfalls of destroying wealth from the merger. Considering the buying price is important when merging, spending too much on the merger will impound the value after the merger. Some mergers do not create wealth so capital is lost through the merger. There is no guarantee of financial gain and every formula considered with focus, just as with an acquisition. The final decision dictated by the variables. One company merging with another company takes the debt and losses of those companies in the new formed company.
Mergers and acquisitions have become a growing trend for companies to inorganically grow a business within its particular industry. There are many goals that companies may be looking to achieve by doing this, but the main reason is to guarantee long-term and profitable growth for their business. Companies have to keep up with a rapidly increasing global market and increased competition. With the struggle for competitive advantage becoming stronger and stronger, it is almost essential to achieve these mergers. Through research I will attempt to dissect the best practices for achieving merger success.
Once again, “A takeover is when one business buys another business. This tends to be more hostile as the buying business is the main one to benefit.” There are some advantages you can gain from this. Firstly, likewise to merging, there can be international growth. “Businesses can make their services or products available globally by acquiring businesses in various locations internationally. For instance, Belgium brewing company, InBev took over Budweiser for $52 billion in 2008 in order to expand its presence in the U.S. market and create one of the largest consumer beverage companies in the world, according to The Times. Due to the acquisition, profits of the company rose by 11 percent in 2011, according to France 24.” (http://smallbusiness.chron.com/)
In this chapter, we first provide coverage of expansion through corporate takeovers and an overview of the consolidation process. Then we present the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations followed by limited coverage of the purchase method and pooling of interests provided in a separate sections.
Mergers and takeovers are forms of external growth within a business. External growth occurs when one firm decides to expand by joining together with another. A takeover specifically refers to the gaining control of a firm by acquiring a controlling interest in its shares (51%). Merger, on the other hand, means the joining with another firm to form a new combined enterprise, shares in each firm are exchanged for shares in the other.
Theoretically it is assumed that mergers improve the performance of the acquiring firm due to
Pikula (1999) observes that in merging two or more entities, the management of the companies must adhere to the Sherman Anti-trust Act which was established in 1890. This act was specifically established to prevent mergers from creating monopolies and cartels with an aim to exploit the consumers through determining prevailing market prices. If the merger results in a monopoly, it won’t be approved by the government. Employee contractual agreements must be considered before, during and after mergers. For the merger to go on seamlessly there should be shareholder approval. Initial approval by shareholders for the companies to consolidate their operations helps prevent conflicts from shareholders after the merger. Lastly, regulatory approval should be considered. The management must register the newly formed company. In addition, managers from the merging parties must consider agreements and contracts that the parties are engaging in as these will be transferred to the new company upon the merger.
This paper is about two companies that went through same type of change (merger and acquisition) with different outcomes. Merger is combination of two or more companies in which the assets and liabilities of the selling firms are absorbed by the buying firm. Although the buying firm may be a considerably different organization after the merger, it retains its original identity while Acquisition is the purchase of an asset or an entire company (Sherman, A. J., & Hart, M. A. (2005). Chapter 1: The Basics of Mergers and Acquisitions. In, Mergers & Acquisitions from A to Z. American Management Association International.).
Merger refers to the combination of two or more companies into a single company where one continues to exist, while the other loses to its corporate existence. The survivor acquires all the assets as well as liabilities of the merger company.
Acquisitions are popular in the United States and there are many reasons why a company decides to acquire another company. Companies will decide to acquire a business in order to increase market power. Market power happens when a company sells its good or services above competitive levels. If a company attains a high market power, it can become a leader (Hitt, Ireland, & Hoskisson, 2015).
Whether or not the merger acquisition is successful depends on (a) the net present value of the investment and (b) paper announcement of the merger. I mean once the merger is sealed, between three and eleven days, changes in the company’s value (the accurer and target) at the time of annoucement of the merger determines the acquisition financial success. The paper announcement returns is supported by Andrade Mitchell and Stafford (2011) after using the database of University of Chicago. Simulation analysis can also be used.
In simple terms, a merger may be regarded as the fusion or absorption of one thing or right into another. A merger has been defined as an arrangement whereby the assets, liabilities and businesses of two (or more) companies become
M&A life cycle, or the stages that are undergone by the organisations when they decide to merge:
The nature of change being witnessed in the contemporary business environment has made mergers and acquisitions a common feature. In the context of mergers, some two or more companies engage in negotiations and start to operate as a single entity. On the other hand, in acquisitions, one large firm acquires a smaller company. While on paper, these two components, both mergers, and acquisitions, may appear straightforward; the gist of the issue is that there is significant complexity associated with both measures.
Mergers occur on a regular basis and raise integration challenges not only in relation to the actual work performed but for all staff members. Multi-national mergers can be even more challenging due to distance, the different national cultures, and different management styles.