Advantages Of Reimbursement

No interference from insurance with patient-provider relationship. Direct reimbursement discourages the patient from over-using the plan since their cost increases as the benefits are used. The reason many employers are looking into the direct reimbursement plans is that it will save them thousands of dollars on the insurance company’s processing costs and

Famine, disease, odor, anger are all experienced while on a voyage to the new world in the seventeenth century. In Lorri Glover and Daniel Blake Smith’s The Shipwreck That Saved Jamestown, the authors’ chronicle the struggles and adventures of the Virginia Company in England. When reading this novel, the main points that stood out most to me was that colonization of America presented a lucrative enterprise and companies will go to great extremes to access the available wealth. The authors of The Shipwreck That Saved Jamestown changed my view on early American colonization in regards to the interactions between natives and Europeans, the abuse of religion, and the harsh conditions settlers endured.

Can you think of one threat that arises from the use of agency theory in developing measures aimed to prevent future banking and/or financial failures?\

Through the history of health care, the standard of care changed from protecting our patient from injury and illness to a systemic entity to make money for insurance companies. Access to services and clinical outcomes are dependent on what health insurance providers will “pay” for in a clinical or community setting; as a result, patient safety, care and satisfaction has been negatively impacted.

Obtaining reimbursement for services provided is a necessity for the survival of many health care organizations. This paper will explain, in my opinion, why the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are involved in this development and how it affects the American public. I will offer a suggestion to ensure meeting policy and procedure. I will finish by discussing three ideas listed on the CMS website.

It is important to follow payer guidelines when completing a claim form; otherwise, reimbursement will be delayed until the form is corrected.

The policy issue that I have selected to discuss herein is the pay-for-performance payment model. I feel that this impacts a large number of our population and changes in this regard should be made. This type of payment model aims to use reimbursement to incentivize providers to deliver high quality services. Pay-for-performance model steps away from the traditional manner of reimbursement of fee-for-service, in which providers receive payment on the basis of frequency or volume of the services they provide regardless of outcomes. In contrast,

First implemented in 1985 by Aetna (previously U.S. Healthcare), P4P programs were used to reward top performers and improve outcomes (Bruno, 2012). The incentives were meant to improve the quality of patient care by basing incentives on patient outcomes. Conversely, fee-for-service reimbursements are based on the treatments and set limits on the amount reimbursed for services. Because of these limits, incentives for use of pharmaceuticals and non-invasive procedures can impact how physicians practice.

One major trend in the healthcare environment is the shift from volume based reimbursement towards value based reimbursement. Many provider practices remain on a volume based or fee for service reimbursement plan. This system tends to reward high quantity of services with less regard for the quality or performance of the service. However, with a renewed focus on value, reimbursement plans

Moreover, we see that some providers are focusing on what providers do and how they get reimbursed rather than what the patient needs, which is a focus that does not prioritize quality of care and therefore does not align with the Triple Aim framework. The problem presented regarding this matter is that the health care system lacks a patient-focused care of medical conditions that puts patients and their health needs first. For example, when we think of provider reimbursement, it is not in the patient’s best interest for the system to only have a simple fee-for-service structure. A structure like this one will only lead to an increase of health care expenses. Also, it fails to incentivize high-value service, which also does not align with the Triple Aim framework health care providers should go by. It is very crucial for the health care system in the United Stated to find a better balance between medical groups reimbursement and patients needs in order to reduce the risk of overutilization.

Another issue for fee-for-service system is that the providers set the prices for services. Patients were free to seek any type of healthcare services that they thought they required, while providers set the costs for each service that was billed to indemnity insurance companies (Shi & Singh, 2015). Insurance companies had little control on the types of services that the patient received and prices billed for each service. The fee-for-service model encourages excessive and unwarranted procedures and offers no incentives to utilize economical services (Smith, 2010). While the patients enjoy the freedom of being able to seek out their own services, over-utilization of expensive services on unnecessary and highly technical services increased healthcare costs.

Based on the political and economic environments of states and the federal government the methods of health care reimbursement have been required to evolve. With the introduction of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) new laws have been set into place that has caused a stringent review of spending on health care. All care provided is being examined for effectiveness, quality, and the actual need of the service. Unnecessary health care functions are being screened and eliminated. The government and other insurance providers have begun to place cost containment measures in place only paying for those procedures that are deemed medically necessary for the illness that the patient is currently afflicted with. This has a direct impact on the monies that the government and insurance providers will reimburse for services. The following paper will look at the major types of reimbursement activates currently in place. The writer of this paper will also speculate on the future of health care reimbursement and how it will affect his current organization.

This rewards quantity over quality. Fee for service does nothing to promote low cost, high value services, such as preventive care or patient education even if they could considerably enhance patients’ physical condition and reduce health care costs through the system. 78% of employer sponsored health insurance is was fee for service. Reimbursement is the form of payment for services provided. The most common practice is the insurance company pays to the provider directly. Under the MCO when receiving care the patient is usually required to pay a small amount out of pocket such as 15 or 20 dollars and the rest is picked up by the managed care plan.

The Iron triangle for healthcare consists of cost, quality, and access; these three characteristics when balanced create great healthcare. Managed Care Organizations combine the three to offer consumers with care that is appropriate for their individual needs. Our book describes managed care organizations as “the cost management of healthcare services by controlling who the consumer sees and how much the service cost” (Basics of the U.S Healthcare System, Niles). Taking a look at the history prior to the Health Maintenance Organization Act of 1973 (HMO ACT of 1973) the implementation has been significant in balancing cost, and quality control. Before this Act was signed in to law by President Nixon healthcare costs were determined by fee for service. A fee for service or indemnity plan is a plan that allows the provider to determine the cost of service, this fee for service plan caused for healthcare costs to increase rapidly. An example of this would be going to the doctor with neck pain, being told to stretch then receiving a bill for 25,000 dollars. As could be understood the cost of healthcare had became a problem.

The positive outcomes that have resulted due to value base programs have caused the model to gain traction and ignite one of the largest changes in history in the health care marketplace. By linking reimbursements to service quality, insurers such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have facilitated a massive leap forward in the performance of United States health care providers. This achievement is a considerable accomplishment in the face of an institution that has received reimbursement from insurers via a fee-for-service model during the last 75 years. Soon, valued based payment models will represent the norm as more insurers support initiatives such as shared savings program, integrated clinical care, and accountable care payment models.