Affects of European Law on English Law

By pursuing this, the manager (agent) also pursues the goals of the shareholders (principals). At least that is the idea behind it.

An agency relationship is a fiduciary relationship that is created with a written contract or oral agreement.

Agency Problem: “The difficulties that arise when a principal hires an agent and cannot fully monitor the agent’s actions.” (Cornett, Adair, & Nofsinger, 2016, p. 15).

2. When an agent acts in violation of his or her ethical or legal duty to the principal, should that action terminate the agent’s authority to act on behalf of the principal? Why or why not?

2.Based on Bluto's conduct, Cass believes that Dee has the authority to act on Bluto's behalf even though Dee has

An agency relationship is fiduciary [good faith] in nature, and the actions and words of an agent exchanged with a third party legally bind the principal.

In this law case, there are different issues that have come from this case that I have analyzed. This case deals with agency law. Agency law is, which is the establishment of the agency relationship, authority of agents, and the duties agents must uphold. Agency law can be very tricky because verbal and written contracts can sometimes be upheld in court or not.

European Law is very complex law , within EU law there is various different treaties which are in place. Two most significant treaties which have importance to the legislative process are The Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union.

he first monarchical government in England is initiated through the victory of Danish in northern England by Edward the elder in 899. Edward the Elder was the first monarch of Britain and he lead it from 899-924. After him many monarchs ruled Britain and Britain continue as an absolute monarchy. They run the country according to their own desire. But when it comes the period of King John 1199-1216 he was insisted to sign the Magna Carta in 1215 by leading noblemen of England. They succeeded in forcing King John to realize that they and other freemen had rights against the Crown. In History many people declare that the last absolute monarch of England was King John. He signed Magna Carta the Charter that gave certain liberties to people and more importantly preserved that the Monarch's will is not tyrannical. Magna Carta was and still is the foundation of the law systems of many countries including UK USA Canada Australia and other countries. King James I 1603-25 of England was the last absolute Monarch in British

“[I]n Britain since the invasion of Community design law, the protection of designs has become utterly disparate both in principle and in the morass of detail. The Government should be taking determined steps to simplify . . . and eliminate unnecessary differences in scope and operation of the rights”.

Henry II was the King of England during the period of 1154-1189. Base on the established law institution, he created the new system of sending royal justices called eyres to every town in England to judge those committed the crime and resolve conflicts. During the visitation, the justices listened to the disputes between individuals and made the decisions based on the similar law cases occurred in the past. This system of judgement was called common law. King also used a tax called scutage collected from the knights and barons to hire the armed force to fight for the country. However, one of Henry II’s descendants John set a high rate of tax to support his army in the war against France which lead to the rebels of English barons and the birth

This essay will review the difference types of competences and examine the effectiveness of the European Court of Justice in ensuring that EU institutions do not exceed the bounds of their competence in adopting legislation.

This paper will assess the claim that supremacy of EU law is still an evolving and debatable concept. To do this, I have divided this paper into four sections. The first section will discuss the establishment of supremacy in EU law through ECJ case law. The second section will explore the vibrant debate surrounding constitutional pluralism that has arisen since the early 1990s. The third section will examine the debate and impact of the codification of primacy in the early 2000s. The fourth section will examine the extent to which the principle of sovereignty has been accepted in three EU Member States, namely, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Poland.

The CJEU case-law on horizontal direct effect of directives arguably lacks consistency in regards to the application of the general principle. The principle of direct effect was established in Van Gend en Loos v. Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen. Although there is no set definition of direct effect, a broader definition was provided in Van Gend en Loos that it “can be expressed as the capacity of a provision of EU law to be invoked before a national court.” However, Van Dyun v. Home Office established that directives are capable of direct effect. Furthermore, Marshall v. Southampton established that there could only be vertical direct effect of directives. This stringent principle has arguable ignited the highly contested debate of whether or not horizontal direct effect is applicable to directives or if directives could only have vertical direct effect. However, this essay shall explore the lack of consistency in case-law regarding horizontal direct effect of directives. Firstly, this paper will delve into the case-law of the topic of horizontal direct effect of directives in efforts to try to highlight its consistency in its approach. Secondly, the paper will use case law and the opinion of academics (enter the name of the academics later) to highlight its inconsistencies using the legal mechanisms that have been introduced by the Courts to try to compensate for the lack of horizontal direct effect of directives. Namely, indirect effect, incidental horizontal

This is a contract whereby a person (principal) asks another party to act on his behalf (as his agent) for a specific task. The person who takes on the task is an agent who will be paid a fee for his services.