Affordable Care Act Case Study

The 2010 government Affordable Care Act (ACA) set up a progression of early market reforms 50-state necessities

Historically the United States of America took pride in free trade and capitalism. Taxes on goods was a key driving force that began the American Revolution and later developed the power-house country present today. So, it is no wonder that when the Affordable Care Act (ACA) incurred new tax reforms, it was far from a smooth transition. In particular, pharmaceutical companies were hit the hardest. Within a ten year span, the drug industry will collectively have to pay $85 billion to the American government.1

Cheryl has been diagnosed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Alcohol Use Disorder. When asked about her concerns for post discharge she states that she has been heavily reliant on her parents and their health benefits for her treatment and that she is nervous that she may not have coverage to continue therapy. She reports that she felt safe knowing that “Obamacare” would be in place to help her afford the treatment she needs to stay mentally healthy and sober. She states that she is concerned about the possible repeal of the Affordable Care Act because she will need help paying for her mental health expenses. The Affordable Care Act made a giant leap in extending the work of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. These two acts work together to ensure that treatment for mental illness is accessible to many Americans that need treatment. Throughout this paper I

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has survived both constitutional and statutory challenges which reached the United States Supreme Court. But opponents of the law are far from defeated. A large number of cases are still pending throughout the country.

Let’s face it, the healthcare system in the U.S. is broken. The passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare) in 2010, was designed to “fix” the issues and provide access to health insurance for 30 million uninsured and underinsured Americans. This has been the biggest move in healthcare since establishing Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 (Moncrieff & Lee, 2011). My stance on the ACA is pretty bland, at best. As with most things, there are pros and cons in every situation. The main cons I have with the ACA are the costs associated with funding. Funding for the ACA will be provided by cuts to Medicare, as well as, tax increases (Hall & Lord, 2014). Medicare has been struggling for years with funding, so by cutting roughly $500

This paper outlines the impacts that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has had on different groups in North Carolina since its signing in 2010. First the paper discusses health care financing as outlined in the case study about "The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on North Carolina’s Uninsured Population" published in Health Policy and Politics Nurses’ Guide. Next it discusses the impacts that ACA has had on the affected population. The topic that follows analyzes the impact of the act on both small and large organizations. Finally, the paper discusses how this act has affected patients and concludes by analyzing its ethical implications.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been the biggest milestone to date in American health care policy (Saldin, 2011). There is nothing more complex or controversial in recent history than the passing of the ACA in 2010 (Davidson, 2016). The United States Supreme Court ratified the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on June 28, 2012. With this, there were certainly challenges facing the full implementation of the provisions of this act by 2014.

The healthcare system underwent reformation in 2010 in the form of The Affordable Care Act. The main goal of the ACA was to extend health care throughout the nation; irrespective of this intention, some people regard the Affordable Care Act as being paternalistic. Chapter 9 covers the issue of how ethical the imposition of new restrictions on people by the ACA is.

There are over 45 million people in the United States who are uninsured when it comes to healthcare. Many are uninsured due to the expensive health care costs. To combat this, the Obama Care administration created the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide nationalized healthcare. The Affordable Care Act is meant to expand health coverage, lower health care costs and hold insurance companies accountable. The Affordable Care Act will allow more people to be insured but the issue lies in the question, do the costs outweigh the benefits? The Affordable Care Act will be used in an attempt to lower health care coverage costs for citizens. An example can be seen from a report in the Kaiser Family Foundation. The premium is required

Health insurance is essential in order to assist in paying for hospital and clinic visits. Without health insurance cost would be astronomical and people would not be able to afford health care. Blue Cross/ Blue Shield and Health Maintenance Organization, were some of the many insurance companies widely used before the Affordable Care Act. Although health insurances existed, many individuals and families were not able to afford them due to the increase in the cost of health care. New research over the years has enabled the creation of new medicine and technology in our practice. This leads to services being more expensive for individuals, which raises the price of insurance.

The A single-payer national health program (NHP) has similarity to the Affordable Healthcare Act. However, it better because is addresses some of the issues that were left out of the ACA. Like, free choice of providers and the preservation of doctor–patient relationships are threatened by our current system (Gaffney, Woolhandler, Angell, & Himmeslstein, 2016). With each enrollment cycle, patients seeking affordable premiums or changing jobs must often switch insurers and risk breaking existing relationships with providers.

The Affordable Care act was design so that all Americans would have some type of medical coverage, this meant the responsibility of each American to enroll and register themselves or their families, by using the new healthcare marketplace system. The federal government gave the authority to individual states to decide whether to implement the Medicaid expansion, most of the states chose to do so, but most of the business is claimed that it was too much of a financial burden to provide health insurance for all of their employees, most of the employers save money by raising rates employees with families, also this would affect the marketplace in different states, each marketplace has different rates. The implementation of the Affordable Care

As companies continue to develop new, innovative products, they gain the advantage that comes from a lack of substitutes that insurers can present. This encourages large pharmaceutical companies to spend money on lobbying to greater influence large decisions made in the executive and legislative branches and maintain their monopolies. In 2014, five major drug companies reported to have increased expenses allotted for lobbying by one million dollars (NCPSSM, 2014). In the long run, this gives large corporations more favorability in the legislation that is enacted on matters concerning Medicare Part D and other drug disputes, creating an unequal advantage. This is most clearly represented in the figure below that outlines how much drug lobbyists have given in terms of donations to politicians. This in turn misrepresents the population that is affected by the decisions made by the government and leaves consumers to deal with the

I am a firm believer in the fact that everyone deserves healthcare. Although the affordable healthcare act does promote health and does cover more screenings so that people can avoid delaying health problems, there are public policy implications that will affect the future of Medicare, Social Security and aging services. The Affordable Health Care Act requires every American to have health insurance and unless exempted, they must pay a penalty when they file their taxes. Businesses are cutting employees hours to avoid covering employees. Insurance companies cannot deny someone because of pre-existing health problems. Companies will have to pay up to cover health care costs and they cannot put a set dollar limit on coverage, which has caused

I am a big proponent of the health care department and the services that it provides especially when I couldn't afford health insurance. I feel that we really need to re-think how we are handling our substance abuse and mental health facilities.