Affordable Care Act Socialism

Long before the 1990s when Ms. Clinton fought for a Universal Healthcare system in America, the issue of America’s healthcare had been a political quandary. The enactment of the Republican administration’s Health Management Organization Act of 1973 was a weapon meant to address that crisis, yet, it did little to fix the problem. While the liberal Democrats are fighting for Universal Healthcare coverage for all Americans, the conservative Republicans are fighting to maintain the current private health insurance, however, with some revamping of the system, which preserves the capitalistic element of the status quo. The reason for the two opposing views stems from their differences in political ideologies, which theoretically is like pitting socialism against capitalism. While the liberal Democrats’ endorsement of Universal Healthcare system is socialistic in practice, the conservative Republicans’ fight to retain the private or market based plan is unarguably in support of their pro-capitalism stance. The truth, however, is that, though almost every American believes in capitalism, yet, almost none would vote to disband the Medicare and the Medicaid programs, both of which are socialistic. In that light, the argument of a pro-capitalist nation is negated, as we do already have a socialized healthcare program for the seniors and the poor. Extending that concept to include

The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is a healthcare program created by president Obama’s administration. The goal of the Affordable Care Act is to make sure every United States citizen has health insurance. The Affordable Care Act provides “affordable” health insurance plans to citizens that do not have any and make about $15,000 a year. While the idea of providing health insurance to the millions of American’s that cannot afford it is great, everything comes at a cost. According to Emily Miller, Obamacare is causing people’s health insurance premiums to rise by around 1 to 9 percent (Miller 15-15). Not only are insurance premiums rising, but ever since the Supreme Court declared the Affordable Care Act constitutional approximately 20 tax hikes have been approved (Battersby). All the aforementioned reasons are helping pay for Obamacare. Although providing health insurance for people that cannot afford it is important, the Affordable Care Act should be revoked because it will hurt the economy.

The Affordable Care Act is a unique type, or a sample of, Universal Healthcare in the United States. It has truly impacted all Americans nationwide since it came into place in 2010. The Affordable Care Act allows all citizens to contain basic health coverage. It requires everyone to purchase health insurance, if not, a fee will be charged to cover for those who do have it. In order for this law to take place, the working Americans must pay higher taxes. The Affordable Care Act has changed the economy, healthy people, the workforce, those of high or low income, tax rates, the quality of care, Medicare/Medicaid, and etc.

Fifty years ago if the reception on the television went bad, first you knocked on the side, then peered in back for bad vacuum tubes and finally tinkered with loose connections. Today we unplug and restart.

In 2010, congress enacted President Obama’s National Health Care Act; as a result, it allows Americans to receive affordable health care. President Obama’s National Healthcare plan, otherwise known as the Affordable Care Act, is anything but affordable. The Affordable Care Act is not affordable for citizens that are in the nation’s lower income brackets. The Affordable Care Act is a great government conscious decision for their citizens; however, the Affordable Care Act at the time of its inception was very fiscally irresponsible by our government. The Affordable Care Act must be affordable for Americans across multiple social and economic backgrounds and should take into account the ability to pay.

What is Affordable Care Act? It is a federal statue, which is a bill passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama in 2010 (Fordney, 2017). Quality care, positive outcomes and access to affordable health care insurance has been an issue on the priority list of government officials. With this healthcare change the objective is to enhance access to care and expand insurance coverage for all Americans. The law incorporates expansions to be established, including the improvement of Medicaid eligibility. Also, the development of medical coverage exchanges, which will give buyers security and flexibility of healthcare coverage. To diminish cost to buyer’s new models for payments was established, thus improving the way care is

Social problems exist all around us, one that seems to be quite prevalent right now is the Affordable Care Act is also known as ACA or more commonly known as Obama Care, which is a derogatory term meant to lessen or negate the President who founded it. There are many issues with this particular act that it’s difficult to pinpoint just one. However, I feel as though the utmost obvious is the negative shadow that is cast upon the Affordable Care Act, this is the real problem. The greatest common insurance that is utilized through this plan is Medicaid, which is insurance that is issued by the state that you live in, and is determined by income (CMS.gov, 2013). The main objective of this policy is to provide medical care for the

First and Foremost , the Affordable Care Act also know as Obama Care was created so our citizens in the United States can all have affordable insurance for the people of this country. The Obama Care is very similar to Canada’s healthcare system. For example , the healthcare system in Canada system is a group of socialized health insurance plans that provides coverage to all Canadian citizens. It is publicly funded and administered on a provincial or territorial basis, within guidelines set by the federal government ( Canadian Health Care n.d. 2016 ). The United States wanted a similar health care system to make sure the americans who don’t have insurances have the ability to be insured .

In the past years down to 2008 we the people have heard conflicting arguments about the Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obama Care”. Obama Care is a health insurance plan ran by the federal government. A health insurance plan in which everyone in the United States is eligible to have weather you are rich, middle class, and even the starving, hurting, suffering poor people that don’t have enough money to even keep the clothes on their back. Health insurance is when you pay an insurance company a certain amount of money per month and if you were to ever get sick

Affordable care act is a law reform for healthcare. It is also known as Obamacare. The goal of this reform was to give access healthcare to uninsured and the people who can’t afford health insurance. There are benefits for the program more people have health insurance and it is affordable. People who are uninsured now have access to health insurance (Kinzer, 2017). The program is teaming up with Medicaid. Medicaid has expanded to help 15 million people that fall under the poverty rate and there is no lifeline on healthcare (Media solutions, 2016).

Although the Affordable Healthcare Act, also known as Obamacare, claims to be different from other countries that have socialized their healthcare, it is actually quite similar to them. For example in countries like Canada and Great Britain both have similar systems that are like Obama is trying to implement here in the United States. “This approach has proven a failure in other countries, leading to the rationing of care and the lowering of standards. It will prove disastrous here - a pubic-policy malpractice.” (Gratzer p.4) With this implementation, we could be going down the same path of these countries that have a government run health care system. Even with the system that we have now, that is causing such great inflation in the economy, it will be the same with or without this new legislation. “Government managed health care systems are facing the same problems with the health inflations.” (Gratzer p.11) It is quite clear in both systems that inflation is almost unavoidable. That can be caused by a much deeper root cause of how these legislations are being implemented and played out. “Blame socialized healthcare, which produces rationed care wherever it appears.” (Gratzer p.8) Another great issue with the Affordable Care Act is that it will rationed out, which can cause people to wait for treatment for a really long time. In

Quality health care is an issue in America for everyone, despite our numerous tests and advances in technology. In his article, “Overkill,” Atul Gawande argues against a common assumption that our healthcare system is the best because of these medical advances. In fact, Gawande claims that our health care provides much unnecessary care that often causes harm and that costs a lot . He follows that claim by redefining “low-value care” as “no-value care” and provides considerable scientific data along with his own experience with his own patients to support his claim. He also states logical reasons by referring to expert authorities who critique our health care by viewing it from an economic perspective: like talking about information asymmetry where a doctor is more informed than the patient, thus the doctor has more power over the patient. All of these emphases strongly defend his controversial claim. But what stands out most is how Gawande uses several stories showing vastly different outcomes, depending on how informed the patient and doctor are including offering non invasive treatments. We need to explore how his unusual storytelling strategy exposes how surgeons and patients should care more about quality than the mere quantity of tests and what alternatives are available to change the unnecessary over testing and over-diagnosis which prevent good health care.

The Affordable Care Act does not take a socialist approach because it is just a welfare act that tries to create affordable health care for every individual in the U.S. Furthermore; it practically forces citizens and legal residents to acquire health insurance from a private insurance market. In other words, the Affordable Care Act serves to give the absolute power to the insurance companies and does not give control to the

In my opinion, the Affordable Care Act does not signal a shift in health policy and law from the free market approach and back to the social contract era. As the text states, the motive behind the social contract perspective was because “the belief that complete physician autonomy over the delivery and financing of health care is potentially dangerous in terms of patient care and health care,” and that “public policy and law can and sometimes should enforce a “social contract” at the expense of physician control. (Teitelbaum and Wilensky, 2017, p. 6.) In addition, the social contract era introduced Medicare and Medicaid by the federal and state governments.

The affordable Care Act implemented in March of 2010 by president Obama reform the way health care was previously run in the United States. The law went into effect, which allowed many Americans who did not currently have insurance and health care coverage to the ability to purchase coverage and access to health care. “ According to the CDC “ the affordable care act of 2010 is designed to provide access to coverage for previously uninsured Americans “ Center of Disease Control (2014).