preview

African Self Autonomy

Better Essays

The archaeological study of enslaved Africans has, in recent years, moved on from the identification of slave homes to the study of the complex power dynamics and relationships between plantation owners (called planters from here on out) and enslaved Africans (Meskell 2002:284). Through archaeological investigations, we are beginning to understand the various ways in which enslaved Africans resisted planter dominance and practiced a limited form of self-autonomy. That being said, this topic requires a certain amount of reflexivity from archaeologists as these investigations still affect the present (Potter Jr. 1991:103). Essentially, archaeologists must be carefully about how the self-autonomy of enslaved Africans is portrayed in order to avoid minimizing their very real mistreatment (Pluckhahn 2010:354). I argue that a landscape approach can be used to better understand …show more content…

The historical record indicates that, at least at Monticello, enslaved Africans sold some of their surplus food or livestock (such as poultry) to their planter or at the local market (Sanford 1994:125). This has been supported in the archaeological record through the excavations of cellars. Amy Young (1997) argues that the cellars at the Locust Grove site may have been used to store surplus food that would later be sold at the market, instead of the cellars being used as a hiding location. Regardless of whether the surplus foods were actually sold at the market, there is evidence that these cellars were at least used for the storage of surplus food (Pluckhahn 2010:353). Again, this is significant as it shows how enslaved Africans used the landscape in order to meet their own needs. It shows a degree of self-autonomy that is not usually associated with African slaves and, therefore, allows us a more holistic understanding of their lives and

Get Access