After School Sports Research Paper

The impact of preserving sports in high schools has been surrounded by much controversy as people suspect that it is the reason behind the poor academic achievement of students. Opponents to high school sports feel that allowing athletics to be a part of schools sidetracks the focus of the student body, which goes completely against the main purpose of schools. Indeed, this assertion is completely true and based upon plentiful evidence. High school sports undoubtedly come at the expense of student academic achievement since they divert the attention of students away from academics and they come with far too many financial costs, both of which incur negative impacts on the academics within a school. The bottomline is that sports are harming the education of students, so a school must make the decision between composing quality sports teams or providing high level academics; both of these choices simply cannot occur simultaneously.

Are schools the right place for sports? This is a question that educators and experts everywhere are asking themselves, as more and more schools are faced with budget cuts and low academic scores. No one is debating the health benefits of exercise one receives from sports, but does the exercise benefit outweigh the expense, risk, and impact on academic grades? Amanda Ripley, the author of The Smartest Kids in the World, thinks club organizations, not schools, should provide sports programming (“Should schools eliminate sports” 1). Earl Smith, author of “Race, Sport and the American Dream,” along with Ripley believes sports are given priority in some schools, drawing attention away from education (“Should schools eliminate sports” 1). During an interview with the New York Times, Smith stated “high schools should not have competitive sports teams. And especially not in the under-resourced intercity high schools where academic programs are often sacrificed to finance sports teams” (“Making Sports an After-School Activity” 1). He went on to say “even the student bodies in many high schools have developed cultures that glorify sports at the expense of the scholar.”

In America, sport is not only a physical activity, which is used for competition or games but it is also one of the main missions in schools in the US. However, there is a post named "The Case Against High-School Sports" written by Amanda Ripley, which are on a website named The Atlantic. In this post, the main idea of the author is that sports are taking too many times and money in schools and that makes some negative impacts on students, schools, and society. In this post, she claims that she can see the benefits of high-school sports and these sports are becoming likely more important than other academics in schools. However, she has wondered about a trend that participating high-school sports too much could lead to some problems. Although

After school sports are a big thing in America. Although students cherish these activities; numerous studies have shown that students get better grades if they drop out of sports. Therefore, schools should get rid of after-school sports because they are expensive, students will get better grades, and athletics is a distraction from school work.

How can sports help a student’s performance in school?  To be able to play sports in school, students need to maintain their grades, thus motivating learners to do well in school (Harris). In addition, a sport allows a person to come out of their comfort zone to meet new people and build up their self-image. Athletes also experience positive health benefits. Especially at a young age, playing sports can help to reduce diabetes, heart diseases, and other sickness that could be very harmful to students (Morris). Sports is something all students should participate in because of its positive effects. Therefore, schools should require students to join at least one sport. Participating in sports will help students build their academic success, develop character and improve their

Another thing from the article (Should Your Schools Get Rid Of Sports?) “Physically active kids have more focus, are better problem solvers, and score higher on tests.” Another thing the article stated was “Young athletes have higher scores in math and english than those who don't participate in sports.” These are all true because also from debate.org on an debate someone stated “Studys show sports help kids with learning also sports provide opportunitys to problem solveing and helps kids get along with each other and as a team.” Sports in fact do not make grades lower but improve then a ton, and also helps kids have better

Amanda Ripley states that, “In the spring of 2012, Premont Independent School District threatened to take out all sports,” she goes on to say that, “sports are embedded in American schools in a way they are not almost anywhere” (10). Amanda Ripley states that, ever since Premont took out sports, “80% of students passed their classes, compared with 50% the previous fall” (Ripley 11). It shows that without school sports, students pass more classes. Clearly, without sports students pass more classes and are able to focus on school.

Catastrophic injury is devastating not only to the injured athlete, but also to the athlete’s family, school and community. The Washington Post indicated that an estimated 800 thousand boys and girls take part in high school sports yearly. This demonstrates how high school sports is a major part of the school extra curricular activity. In Daniel Gould article "Are High School Sports Good For kids?" he found that students who took part in high school sports got educational benefits and extracurricular activities have positive effects on adolescents .Experts may argue that high school sports allow kids to be physical active, but they must also recognize the clear dangers. Playing high school sports come with serious consequences and life altering changes such as physical injuries, peer pressure and psychology effects.

In the United States, schools spend more than double the amount of tax dollars on high school athletes than schools do on students. Americans have taken delightful pride and joy in sporting events for decades in both primary and secondary schooling. Meanwhile, in recent years the U.S. has fallen behind drastically in academic rankings. Some argue that sports actually help engage students in school, notwithstanding the statistics show otherwise. Schools spend too much time and money on sports, resulting in poor academic scores

Ripley interviewed a former football player at Premont High School who stated after eliminating sports, “There was all this extra time, you never got behind on your work (11).” The interview goes onto to say that the teacher parent conferences received 160 participants, rather than 6 the year before (Ripley 11). The information above indicates that these once sports - minded children could now explore more educational and intellective paths. As expressed, children, without after school games, can focus directly on their scholastic

School sports play an important role in a child’s school experience; however, some people think they can be harmful, and should be eliminated. Athletics can take up a great deal of time and can cause people to get injured which may harm the person's capability to learn. Therefore, schools should ban sports to, save money, give students more time to work on their homework, and providing them more time to work on their studies.

Sports, is a “death wish” for students who want to have good grades and a good education and not get distracted in their school, and home life. So, therefore schools don’t need to have sports because it can cause distraction to the students that are in a sport. It is quite evident that students should focus more on school then sports. During school days the coaches for the sport teams are focused on a plan for the next game, but the price will be high and they might not have the right amount of money. Therefore, schools need to focus more on their work then on a sport because a good education leads to a better life instead of being an athlete because you never know one day it will not work

After school sports are a big deal in America. Although many children believe that sports help them reduce stress; numerous studies have shown that students have been distracted from academics. Therefore, districts should get rid of after school sports because they cost too much money, they take away focus from academics, and kids will get better grades.

One reason schools should keep sports is kids who play sports are more focused than kids who don’t. Studies show that kids who play sports have better focus in school, they are better problem solvers, and score higher on tests. Kids who play sports, are more likely to do better in school. It’s better if kids are more focused, and have better grades. Kids can be more of a better student playing sports. Kids who play sports are more relaxed than kids who don’t. They are better listeners because they are more focused. Kids can have nothing to worry about if they play sports. If kids aren’t stressed out then it's better for to take tests and do homework. Kids who play sports can be better students. Kids who play sports have better

One of the biggest complaints about interscholastic sports is the belief that sports take focus away from academics. Amanda Ripley, journalist and author, elaborates on this very issue. She provides many examples of the ways that sports play a negative role in American schools, and how she believes that they are the reason to blame for the shortcomings of American students: “Sports are embedded in American schools in a way