Created in 1789, and ratified two years later, James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties and place specific restrictions on governmental power. Today, and at times in the past, these “guaranteed rights” have been compromised in order to make the nation safer, as well as protect the people. Typically, in a time of war, civil liberties are decreased, therefore infringing on our constitutional rights. For example, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which thrusted America into World War II, the federal government began placing curfews on Japanese, German, and Italian Americans. A year after the 1941 bombing, more than 120,000 Japanese-Americans were forced to relocate to internment camps. FDR created this executive order, …show more content…
Today, there are an estimated 357 million firearms in the United States. Today, there has been an increase in mass shootings since the year 2000. With this sharp rise, debates have begun on how to solve the problem. In order to combat this rise, some argue that there should be restrictions on who, and what type of guns an individual is allowed to possess. For example, Los Angeles, California, is notorious for having some of the strongest restrictions on firearms. Gun control laws such as prohibiting residents to own a handgun or rifle magazine that fits more than ten rounds, has been issued to quell this problem. This requires residents who possess these items to remove, sell or transfer them out of city limits. This law, with the intent to increase the safety of citizens, has in turn taken away their second amendment right to bear arms. Gun control supporters justify this disregard for the second amendment on the basis that the general welfare of the American people will increase. These restrictions although in the name of safety, have taken away the rights of law-abiding
Due to recent mass shootings in the U.S. many Americans fear for their safety. Many Americans fear to go out to movie theaters, restaurants, and even their children 's schools. In the article "Will Sikh temple shooting spark U.S. conversation on gun control", Peter Greier claims "Americans are deeply split about the prospect of new gun laws, and tragic events such as recent mass killings do not change voter opinions." Gun control laws should be any more strict because it would be violating the Second Amendment and the right to bare arms to protect yourself against criminals.
The Bill of Rights was proposed by James Madison in 1789 and has impacted the US ever since. When proposing the Bill of Rights, Madison had one main goal in mind, to enable United States citizens to fully be aware of their rights and be able to practice them freely and patriotically. With this being said, all of our rights are a necessity and play a huge role in our lives as US citizens. However, I personally view some rights more important than others.
The Bill of Rights is one of the most essential documents produced in the United States. It was written September 25, 1789 and was approved December 15, 1791 written by James Madison. The purpose of this document is to protect citizens from excessive government power.
It appears as though the repetitive and unfortunate tragedies of mass shootings have become incorporated into the everyday life of American culture. We are forced to live in a heightened degree of fear, skepticism, and hesitation concerning our public safety. This phenomenon could reasonably occur in response to the vast ineffectiveness of the country’s current gun laws. Time after time similar misfortunes arise, yet few major changes are implemented to prevent them from reoccurring in the future. We cannot let this trend continue any further. Though some claim that increased gun control is useless and infringes upon the Second Amendment, it limits civilians’ weapons grade, obstructs those deemed unfit to wield such lethal weapons, and insures a greater level of security, thus it should be executed.
Significance: This topic is extremely significant because gun rights are under attack from many politicians in America, who are attempting to take protection out of the hands of the law-abiding citizens of this great country. Current laws in much of the country control what kind of gun people can and cannot own, as well as when and where they can carry them (if at all). In addition, more restrictive gun laws have not reduced mass shootings and have allowed for a larger number of gun-related deaths to occur.
The debate over stricter gun laws has been ongoing in the United States for quite some time now. Individuals who oppose stricter gun control laws argue that the second amendment to the constitution of the United States constitute part of the bill of rights that protect the right of American citizens to bear arms, and any attempt to set up laws for gun control will be a direct violation of this (Hofstadter 10). They argue that the primary purpose of the amendment was to ensure that American Citizens had the capability to protect themselves against criminal activities and defend the country against external aggression. From a personal perspective, the recent surge in instances of gun violence in the United States of America indicates that stricter gun control laws are necessary for the safety of the American citizenry. Thus, this paper is going to focus on highlighting the benefits of more stringent gun control laws and why members of the public should support it.
In 1791, the Bill of Rights was created to specify the individual rights of every human being. Madison James is the creator of the 10 Amendments, he believed it was necessary to create the document to further explain what the Constitution will provide for each person. The Bill of Rights gives every citizen the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, as well as the freedom of the press, and lastly the due process rights. This document was formed when the Constitution in 1789 was drafted. Federalist viewed the Bill of Rights as an unnecessary document that the Anti-federalist wanted in order to feel safe in knowing what the Constitution was really about and what was entitled to them.
Gun control has become an increasingly controversial topic in the nation due to the continuous debates relating to gun control and whether or not laws should be passed to make it harder for guns to be obtained. Guns serve for a variety of purposes that range from good to bad. Guns are not for everyone. Some individuals cannot handle guns properly, and some choose to use guns inappropriately. Lately, guns have become more of a problem in our society. There has been an increasing amount of shootings that have taken many lives and have wounded people emotionally, not just physically. Although guns are used for protection, firearms are reportedly used more in crimes. More and more shootings are breaking out across the nation. As a result, the
The first ten amendments of the United States Constitution make up one of America’s founding documents, the Bill of Rights. These ten amendments were put in place in order to protect the freedom of American citizens from excessive government power. Written by James Madison, the 4th United States President, the Bill of Rights became effective December 15, 1791 (“James”). Madison is one of the founding fathers of the United States, and is highly praised for his work on the Federalist Papers and the United States Constitution (“Bill”). In this paper I will discuss the importance and effects of the Bill of Rights, specifically the first, second, and fourth amendments.
Should the mere fact that criminals committing crimes with the use of guns infringe the national right of the innocent to possess guns. This is a question that arouses everywhere and no matter which way it is viewed the controversy will always go on. "A gun is a mere tool that can be used for good or evil. Our country is based on the belief that man is good until he or she is proven to be otherwise."(Harris p.2) This means that only a few people are committing crimes with uses of guns and why completely remove them from society. Therefore, we should strenuously protect the rights of free men and likewise prosecute and punish the criminals who abuse the rights of others. The problem with gun violence is associated with the
The Bill of Rights: A Normative Critique The Bill of Rights, proposed by James Madison is a list of rights that are entitled to every American in the United States. The purpose of these rights are to protect the well-being of citizens and guarantee a number of personal freedoms. The bill of rights was originally proposed in 1789 when James Madison discussed adding amendments to the constitution (Madison, p. 1).
Crime and guns, the two always seem to be acting together, however, these two elements are absolutely nothing alike. Do guns commit the horrific crimes? Do the laws placed on gun control keep the citizens of the United States safe? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when they try to launch laws on gun control. Although many people are for gun control, they do not realize that gun control violate the United States Second Amendment. The Amendment is only 27 words: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Citizens all around America are making the decision that they are for gun control. Their hope is that it will help with the recent shootings, robberies, and murders. However, some people believe that if they take away people’s rights for guns the criminals out there may be able to get their hands on guns anyway. Therefore, guns should be used for law enforcement agencies, to prevent the criminals from becoming more powerful than our own police officers.
“The second amendment of The United States Bill of Rights is my concealed weapons permit, period.”- Ted Nugent. Saving lives one by one starts with limiting the purchase, sale, and use of guns in America. According to Alexander Lee, the political and social debate over the question of how much gun control is appropriate and it has been regularly discussed within the last decade. Shootings such as Sandy Hook, and Tucson shootings have raised the government’s awareness on guns and possible restrictions and regulations. Gun talks are discussed with the question, “Will controlling guns cut back on violent crime rates?” Although many guns are open to be sold to the public over 18, there are traditional gun laws that limit who can own them. These laws include sell restrictions to the mentally disabled, the age in which you can obtain a gun, background checks, and dishonorably discharged military personnel. Gun control laws could have a positive effect in America by reducing homicide rates, but at the same time, citizens still have the right to bear arms under the second amendment under the U.S constitution. Gun control laws do not mean the absolute confiscation of guns, but rather reduce the amount of power a gun and the amount of ammo that a gun can hold.
Over the past few years, with numerous deaths taking place, the debate over whether or not gun licenses are a sufficient and effective process towards guaranteeing safety and reducing the deaths of innocent people, has risen substantially. While supporters of firearms argue for less gun control laws, and contend that gun licenses are a sufficient method towards reducing crime, since it monitors who purchases and owns firearms. Recent tragedies have demonstrated the en-forcement of stricter gun control laws in the United States is an extremely essential process, since gun license no longer guarantee the safety of citizens throughout the country. Even if a citizen has a gun license and is qualified to own and operate a firearm, the chances of
The second amendment to the US Constitution is momentous, as it guarantees the right of each citizen to bear arms. It also states that the right of individuals to bear arms, “shall not be infringed” (United States Constitution, n.d.), which makes the issue of gun regulation difficult. Americans in astronomical numbers exercise their right to own guns, as studies “suggest that about a third of Americans have at least one” gun (Fox, 2015) . The issue of gun violence, however, has become commonplace as “more than 11,000 Americans were killed by gun violence in 2013 alone” (Obama, Common Plance of Gun Violence, 2015). Similar to the Gun Control Act signed in 1968, further gun regulation will not encroach on gun rights, but instead expand on those