Against Warning Labels Research Paper

Research shows that when such information is given, customers use it to limit the way they eat. This can consume an average loss of calories than they typically did before labeling. This trend poses increased risk, not just in terms of calories, but in terms of unhealthful ingredients such as fat and sodium. According to the passage, "the U.S. government agrees that restaurant meals should be labeled. It is part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, which requires that standard menu items include information on nutrition 1". This poses that fast food places and restaurants should in fact label information, not only for ones own health but it is required.

In the article “Putting Warning Labels on Sugary Drink Would Save Lives, ” by Russ Lloyd, it talks about how if we put caution labels on soda it will prevent many people from drink as much sugar as they do. In the text it shows how if we put caution labels on soda then it will prevent many terrible things. First off, people can get many health problems from it. The article states, “Eating too much of it can lead to obesity and put you at risk for heart disease, diabetes and so many other health problems” (Lloyd 18). This shows, how putting labels on soda can prevent many terrible things because, people can get many health issues with people’s body. Also, sugar is addictive to most everyone. The author explains, “In fact, brain scans reveal

Gluten free is also a big warning and so isn’t Sugar free labeling for diabetics (Food Act). With this front labeling for things like gluten free and sugar free is good because it helps the people that it affects but, what about the people that are allergic to tree nuts. There is no front labeling for that, that information is in fine print on the back

Approximately eighty percent of food eaten in the United States contains GMOs, but not many people know what they are actually consuming from their food sources (Prah). Genetically modified organism, also known as genetically modified organisms engineered in a lab by scientists that alter the genes of plants and animals. By fixating DNA from other organisms into America’s food sources, they create substances that are detrimental to the health of human beings. In addition to this, these genetically modified organisms are completely foreign to the plants and animals they undergo; their genes can become damaged from inserting the genes of the organisms. This unnatural process can interfere with a metabolic pathway in the plant or animal. In addition, studies have shown that on average forty-four percent of people had the “Round-up Ready” herbicide, glyphosate, which is used on genetically modified crops, found in their bodies (Stonebrook). Both, the genetically modified organisms and the chemicals used on them, cause several problems to occur in humans and other organisms which consume GMOs. These include tumors, damaged immune systems, allergies, and infertility; this is dangerous to the health of humans and to their regular body processes. Americans have the right to know what is going into their bodies and how these man-made GMOs are affecting them. By the government

In Zinczenco’s view “I'd say the industry is vulnerable. Fast-food companies are marketing to children a product with proven health hazards and no warning labels. They would do well to protect themselves, and their customers, by providing the nutrition information people need to make informed choices about their products” (Zinczenco, 2002.) In making this comment, Zinczenco urges fast food

If someone would tell you otherwise, then it would be like cigarette companies telling their customers that cigarettes were actually healthy for you (Healio). Instead of simply banning fast food and companies who sell unhealthy foods, the government should do what they did with cigarettes and simply regulate the companies. One thing the United States government did that was so successful with the tobacco companies was tax the product to make them more difficult to purchase (Tobacco Free Kids). According to tobacco free kids.org, “Every 10 percent increase in cigarette prices reduces youth smoking by about seven percent and total cigarette consumption by about four percent”(tobacco free kids). If the government increased taxes on companies that sell unhealthy foods, it would certainly help lower the overall obesity rate (Bittman New York Times). Also this would help companies that sell healthier foods better compete with the large fast food corporations (Bittman New York Times). Although food labels are required to be on unhealthy foods nowadays, the labels still do not have the attention grabber that cigarette signs have on them. For example most cigarette warning signs will have a message that says something like “CAUTION: CIGARRETTE SMOKING MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH” (RJ Reynolds Tobacco). If there were to be a warning sign on unhealthy foods like this then it would certainly make more people concerned about what food they’re eating then just a food label, which is on all of the foods. If a person who sees a sign that indicates how badly unhealthy foods can be and they still eat it, then they are making a choice that Americans have the right to

The purpose of the nutritional labels is to inform individuals how many calories they are about to intake or how much fat does that one particular item acquire. Understanding what is incorporated in the foods that are being ingested can help people make wiser decisions on what is more healthier to maintain a proper diet. A healthy diet is very compelling in an individual's lifetime and reading nutritional labels is taking them in a satisfying path that can improve their overall diet. This solution has be around, but yet just being ignored because individuals will consume what they think is delicious and not consider how many calories are contained. The importance of having educational classes mandatory to all Americans about the deadly epidemic will not only reduce the obesity rate, but also bring the American society to its

Marijuana is the most widely used illegal drug in the United States, while some states have passed legislation to allow non-medical and medical marijuana use, the question of whether or not warning labels are beneficial is a good one. There are several studies on marijuana that include: passive exposure(second-hand smoke), potency(which can vary widely), motor vehicle safety, health, healing properties and its commercialization which are all very good reasons for a warning label. Warning labels would allow the consumer to make an informed decision as well as educate about any side effects the consumer may or may not be aware of. Depending on who or what company is conducting the study of marijuana determines the outcome which is another reason

The memo will be about the new rules for Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplements Fact Labels. This new rule was a proposal, which was done according to the Food and Drug Administration. I will have the memo broken into a few main points. The main points will go over the main idea of the piece and go into the detail about each one. The first main idea of the memo will be about going into detail in the decision of the Food and Drug Administration to see why they are making the changes to the rule. Next, I will go into how there are quite a few organizations which are very affected because of the new rule change. Lastly, I will go into detail about all the new things, the people, and organizations affected by these changes in the rule.

I have seen many new laws form in Michigan over the last 63 years I have lived here. Some were good and some were not so good, but hearing the possibility that H.R.1599 may not pass is very disturbing to me. The Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015 is a fair and common sense way to address the issue of necessary food labeling, which is why it has my full support. Assigning one body to govern food labeling, nationally, is smart and efficient. I cannot think of a more qualified organization to be in charge of this than the Food and Drug Administration. Having the FDA in charge makes much more sense than allowing the states to run rampant with regulations because the FDA already checks our food's safety. The FDA has scientists and specialists who are extremely knowledgeable in the area of food safety and verifying ingredients. Not supporting H.R. 1599 will lead to unqualified individuals controlling the guidelines; this is very irresponsible. So I ask that you do everything in your power to support this bill and rally support from your colleagues.

America’s health has taken a disastrous toll in the recent decades, with the rapidly increased popularity of processed convenience foods laden in fat and sugar, along with the correlating rise of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. As of 2010, nearly 70% of adults in America aged 20 or higher are overweight or obese (Ogden et all). Both obesity and diabetes are preventable diseases that result directly from overindulgence and poor nutrition. Contemporary marketing practices, which entail displaying misleading buzzwords on front-of-package food labels, negatively affect consumers’ abilities to make healthy choices. To help reverse this epidemic, it is essential that Americans begin reading labels and educating themselves about the foods they consume.

warning labels have the potential to save people from life threatening conditions such as, obesity,

This affects you. It's your life. You should at least be aware or slightly concerned of what you're eating. There are people out there like pregnant women, sick people, and informed consumers that make decisions from these labels. We live in the age of information and have the capability to search up anything from our phones, even right there in the supermarket. The big picture boils down to that with advances in any technology that may even be seen as beneficial from a medical point of view, consumers should have the right to make their own decision what they’re actually

According to Fast Food Nutrition, having a burger, fries, and a soda would be about half of what the Medical News Today says your calorie intake should be. Would knowing this change your mind on your meal choice? For most Americans, the answer is no. What's the point of putting warning labels on something if it's going to be ignored? There shouldn’t be warning labels on fast food because warning labels are expensive, not informative, and are ignored.

Do we really need to be notified that sodas can kill you if you drink too much? Additionally, people have to be foolish in order not to know that soda can lead to illnesses, people should not have to put labels on the drink. As you may know, sugary drink have the tendency to rot your teeth, and occasionally, lead to damage or pain throughout your body. Sodas are the biggest source of added sugar in the diets of young Americans. Before sugary drinks slowly take the youth America down from inside and out, companies have come up with a possible solution to fixing this problem. According to “Your Favorite Drinks can Wreck your Body,” by Evan Cook,“Soda Warning Labels: Rated F for Futility”By: Martina M. Cartwright, and, “Soda is not the #1 Cause of Obesity,” by Cameron English, companies all over America are