Age Of Age Research Paper

What is the right age of responsibility, where a teenage is entitled as an adult? Some say 18 and lower, while others say 21 and higher. Nowadays, there is a wide spectrum of ages as to what is deemed to be correct in society. “What is the age of responsibility” by Alan Greenblatt explains how young adults are constantly getting mixed messages as what age they are viewed as responsible young adults. The age of responsibility for young adults should be at age 21.

“What is the age of responsibility?” said Alan Greenblatt in his article “The Age of Responsibility.” Clearly what can be seen according to one of his lines “In America, ‘adulthood’ already has its familiar compass points, 18 and 21” (Greenblatt Par. 6) that the controversy between the milestone of adulthood and what age it should be is blatantly present in society. When Alan Greenblatt explained “...what if that age--the point when citizens are responsible enough to earn all rights [...] bear no resemblance to the ages already enshrined in law” (Par. 6) obviously what can be seen is that even though adulthood is marked between age eighteen and twenty-one, that doesn’t mean they’re responsible enough to handle them. Several factors apply to marking the milestone of adulthood, such as rites, rights, responsibilities, and overall: the age of responsibility.

Society proposes at the age of eighteen an individual is mature and responsible to make decisions without the consent of a parent or guardian. In the United States an eighteen-year-old is considered a legal adult. By law you are able to fight for your country, vote, and buy cigarettes. Some impose, giving a newly young adult the privilege to consume alcohol would enhance their responsibility as an adult. Mary Cary from

Everyone knows that it is illegal to consume alcohol under the age of 21. Why is 21 the "magical" age that makes a person intelligent and mature enough to consume alcohol? Sure, some adults abuse alcohol and some teenagers would be perfectly able to drink responsibly, but why not 18 or 35 or 40? This seemingly random number, 21, is associated with adulthood, as if the day a person turns 21 they know everything and are mature. The drinking age should be lowered to where one can learn to drink responsibly.

Upon turning eighteen you are considered to be legal adult and receive all of the responsibilities that accompany the title. At the age of eighteen year olds you receive and are expected to use the rights and responsibilities to vote, serve on juries, get married, sign contracts, join the military--which includes taking on the responsibilities of life and death--and be prosecuted as an adults in the court of law along with many other things. In 1984, the national government raised the drinking age from 18 to 21. Mothers Against Drunk Driving was a key contributing organization that influenced the change in the minimum drinking age. While there are arguments for both sides, it is said that if the national minimum legal drinking age is

The age limit for drinking should be twenty-one because it would have the benefits of reducing crime. Some people who drink heavily are influenced by alcohol to make bad and dangerous decisions. The alleged person who is under the influence making these risky and poor choices might not be logical at the time, but as a result will be an act of crime. For example: According to the National Council On Alcoholism And Drug Dependence INC. (NCADD), “Alcohol is a factor in 40% of all violent

In the United States, a citizen is considered an “adult” at the age of 18, and with that new title comes many responsibilities, such as the right to vote and to join the army. However, the legal drinking age in America is twenty-one. This issue has been a major controversy for some time now that faces both national and state governments. Should the drinking age be lowered to the age when legally a person becomes an adult and assumes all other adult responsibilities, or should it remain at a higher age to allow people to grow more mature and, hopefully, make more responsible decisions?

The legal drinking age in the United States is 21, while in other countries the legal age ranges from 16-18. The argument in the United States is, “Should the United States lower its drinking age?” There are many sides to this argument but research has given many good points to back up both sides of the question. First issue is the difference between a teen’s brain with alcohol and an adult’s brain with alcohol. Another concern is that drinking at a younger age can help teach culture. Lastly, the more alcohol that people are exposed to, there is an increase in death rate. I believe that it is a good idea to keep the legal drinking age at age 21 because in our past we have had many problems with increased deaths due to the drinking age being at different ages. My research used uses pathos, logos, ethos and kairos to help persuade the reader that 21 should stay the legal drinking age.

Many people think the drinking age should stay the same or even be lowered. They say that age should not depend on your responsibility to be able to drink. Some even say the drinking age is already too high and that the deaths do not matter how old you are. People that are around the age of eighteen are already independent and that they are already considered adults, so they shoud be able to drink. Even though some people believe that the drinking age should stay the same or it should be lowered, the drinking age should actually be raised to the age of twenty-five.

“Drink responsibly” is what many alcohol producing companies are now promoting in their advertisements and even on cans and bottles that the beverage is contained in. The government believes that the “responsible” age to consume alcohol is 21. The truth is drinking alcohol irresponsibly is the cause for many undesired events. Alex Wagenaar and Mark Wolfson state that “underage alcohol use results in substantial premature deaths, disability, preventable hospitalizations, and human suffering”. The legal drinking age is and should remain at 21. Lowering the legal drinking age will cause more deaths and injuries upon teenagers.

In the article “What is the Age of Responsibility?” by Alan Greenblatt (2009), he states that the age of responsibility is something that teens have been having mixed feelings about for a very long time. I agree with him, the age of responsibility shouldn’t be a set age but an age where people can actually use common sense to make reasonable decisions in life. Some examples would be the legal age to enter the army and rent out a car, then Ronald Dahl explains how teens are able to handle responsibility a little at a time, and finally a personal experience of mine. All explain how all these ages are thoughtless and unreasonable with the world we live in today.

Age Of Responsibility In the article “What is the Age of Responsibility” written by Alan Greenblatt, he states that instead of giving people their rights at a certain age and that they should be given those rights at their maturity level. I do understand why Greenblatt believes it should be mind over age but I believe the age of responsibility should be 18. At age 18 people expect you to be an adult and get a job and pay your bills, if that doesn't sound responsible then I don't know what does.

In the article What is the Age of Responsibility? Alan Greenblatt points out the inconsistencies in the law regarding different responsibilities at different ages. He talks about a man named Justin McNaull in his first paragraph who, by the time he was twenty-three, had graduated from college, married and had gone to work as a police man who was involved in police pursuits at more than 100 mph, and was not allowed to rent a car. The article mainly pointed out that the government seems to be confused with this question as well: what is the age of responsibility? In my opinion, eighteen seems to be a good age to allow people more rights. I also believe that it doesn't matter at what age you pinpoint responsibility, not everyone will fall perfectly into the laws. Some people may be fully matured by the time they're eighteen and some may be far from mature. Either way, the age eighteen has seemed to work out for other major laws, so why can’t an eighteen year old

“Responsibility” is not just a word and “age” is not just an anniversary. Age of responsibility is a complex concept that goes beyond the unthinkable. How responsible and how mature one is should determine the rights and responsibilities one is able to acquire instead of basing it solely on age. But if there must be an exact age of responsibility, I believe it should be 21. The age at which most people are capable of sustaining themselves, and are mature enough to make changes in their lives.

A lot of people have different views when it comes to when a person should be considered an adult. An adult is a person who has reached the age of maturity. The age of majority is the legally defined age of which a person is considered an adult, with all the attendant rights and responsibilities of adulthood. The big question then becomes when should a person be considered a legal adult? I stand with many Americans and the government and say that a person should be considered an adult when they become 18 years old.