Essay about Ageism Against Teens

Trepidations pertaining to young people, being unable to fulfil their educational goals, being involved in antisocial activities, expelled from mainstream schools because of truancy and other disruptive transgressions or out of work, reinforce the obligation to the end child poverty ingenuity implemented by the Coalition Government in 1999. Equally, in their manifesto, the Conservatives avowed to enhance the emphasis on assisting families and vulnerable young people. Subsequently, this is trailed by the government’s enactment of pertinent policies to try and refine the life probabilities of young people who have numerous concerns. Likewise, this has prompted the invention of more initiatives, including the advent of the targeted youth programs.

This essay will identify a case I have been involved in and have continuously had to assess whilst on placement. It will refer to a child who will be identified as A. A is a young carer and has only recently returned home after being removed from his mothers care due to her having a substance abuse problem and mental health concerns. I will link the legal framework that was relevant to this case study and describe actions taken. Additionally these actions will demonstrate the application of social work methods and theories that were contributive elements in his intervention, offering explanations as to why these particular methods were used. Before closing, the essay will review any issues of discrimination with a reflection of the

The Children Act 1989 and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC; United Nations Charter for the Rights of Children 1989) and the Children and Families Act 2014 have driven a theoretical and policy shift in the attitudes and understandings of children’s involvement in the services relevant to them (Goodyer, 2012; Simpson, 2015). Goodley, (2012 p394) argues children’s rights under the UNCRC are based on the three premises of rights: the rights to protection, provision and participation. This distinction can contribute to the ways in which welfare provision in England operates different models, simultaneously creating tensions between parallel provisions. The child development model underpinning the current child and family practice enables the provision and protection aspects of children’s right to be addressed. Child and family social work has been extremely preoccupied with providing children with a safe and protected childhood, with looked-after children being deemed a low priority in the participation, design, delivery and monitoring of their services (Goodyer, 2012). According to Cocker and Allian (2012 p36) “the philosophy of the Children Act 1989 is that the best place for children to be brought up is within their own family, and that children in need can be helped most effectively if the local authority – working in partnership with parents – provides an

The criminal construction of youth is especially problematic for young people who are male, non-English and hang around in groups (Wilson Rose & Colvin 2010). From the construction of a criminal youth the government creates legislation to reduce the societal fear of crime, such as zero tolerance legislation designed to promote preventative policing through profiling techniques that target minor offences. One such legislation can be seen through Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 No 103 (LEPRA) (New South Wales Government 2013), section 197.1(b) where a person is issued a direction by a police officer, if the police officer believes that the behaviour constitutes intimidation or is likely to cause fear. White (2015) claims that the construction of youth as criminal and the subsequent legislation marginalises young people, especially Indigenous, and fosters antisocial behaviour and the feeling of an unjust system. Moreover, the current Neo-liberal ideology asserts that everyone is responsible for their own life path, but it ignores the structural factors that limit opportunities for many young people (Evens 2006). As such, Copeland (2008), White (2015) and Iveson (2009) claim that with the privatisation of public space and the lack of socioeconomic power of young people, creates and environment that prevent young people from transitioning into adults by labelling them as dangerous and disruptive if they make any mistakes in

What can be done to avoid the stigmatisation of vulnerable young people and provide them with equal opportunities in society?

For most of the twentieth century, England and Wales were dominated by the welfare approach. In essence, it entails that due to insufficiently developed capabilities, children lack full responsibility and society has the moral obligation to foster and ensure their well-being. Furthermore, the unique position of children is recognised through the policies predicating this model of justice. Juveniles’ criminal conduct is deemed to be associated with problems on a mental or community level, which warrant that their specific needs are more aptly addressed through actions external to the justice system. This approach postulates that the focus of governmental policies and practices should be children, their essential necessities and redirection away from the penal system.

Within this study report I will look at how young people can be discriminated against within the wider society and how I could and would challenge this within my youth work practice.

Here we will look at the strategies of youth justice policies and practice with the ideological motivations and identify and evaluate the social and political context. The 1908 Child Act; Children and Young Persons Act, the Criminal Justice Act; Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 will be discussed.

Prior to entering the field, the aim of the research was to undertake a qualitative, interview based study of young people’s transitions. However, as this chapter will begin to outline, participant observation at Crayville and Realclub unearthed high aspirations which young people found difficult to achieve and the problematic stigmatisation that their communities faced through gang and deprivation labels. It was through such discussions that it became apparent that young people were more equipped to identify issues that were important to them. In consideration of these questions and the inert nature of youth transitions today being experienced differently by different groups of young people, it is of critical importance for this research that the voices of young people transitioning to adulthood are prioritised in ensuring the same generalisations about youth transitions are not made to the young people within this research. Without this priority there is a danger the research would, to an extent, serve to reinforce the power dynamic between those in power (youth workers, education providers and researchers) and those subject to it (the participants of this study) subsequently shaping the research design and ultimately its findings.

Kids starting out in the youngest grades are either leaders or followers without even thinking about it, and the same way the young kids do not know it most teens do not even realize. Either you are a leader or a follower, either you make good choices or bad, regardless at the end of the day someone is always watching. People naturally need to attach themselves to something or someone, and if they are pushed to extremes and the percentages of them finding a bad source goes up. I feel like wrong things are easier to get into than right things because it is easy to do wrong it can be comfortable to do wrong but it takes integrity and self determination to pick the right choices. At the end of the day everyone ends a trustworthy supporting cast around them and work on opening up whenever things get tough because internalizing pain is the worst

This problem warrants more attention over other issues as the issue itself is that perspective of young people are given little attention, it is difficult to address issues of which society it unaware. It is suggested that advocacy constructed by adults can have significantly important implications on the way in which it is experienced by young people (Dalrymple 2005, p. 7). Importantly, it has been found that there tends to be a great mismatch between what adults speculated to be important issues and what young people perceived (Goodwin, & Young, 2013, p. 353). In addition, findings suggest that despite legislative requirements to include young people in issues directly related to them, they often feel that they are not taken seriously or listened to (Dalrymple 2005, p. 4). This implies that young people are on the lower steps of Hart’s ladder of participation and are predominantly left unheard in society (Hart 1992, p.8). Dalrymple (2005, p. 5) suggests that advocacy is a critical tool that can be used to overcome the oppression of young people by adults, this in turn can allow them to climb Hart’s

Although teenagers and toddlers are similar in the way they are needy, they are mostly different. One way they are different is age. Another they are different is mobility, the last way they differ is in brain activity. It is obvious the age difference between a toddler and teenager. Toddlers age range from 2-5 and a teenagers age range from 13-19.

Belonging to a lower class is becoming more common in nearly every nation-state throughout the world (Dawes, 2017). According to the Foundation for Young Australians (2011) “young people from low socio-economic backgrounds…continue to be overrepresented in the statistics of the socially excluded” (as cited in White, Wyn & Robards, 2017, p.432). There are many contributing factors to this social exclusion. Some of the main contributing factors have to do with economic resources and being able to ‘fit in’ to the youth subculture. Further struggles can be seen in relation to schooling and education success and supports. Complications in these areas often lead problems with employment and can also lead to involvement in crime. It is important to understand what the causes of social exclusion are, and what it looks like to these young people, before attempting to address the issue.

This essay shall be based on the assumption that I am a Local authority social worker given the case referral of Stephanie and Stephen. The essay shall be focusing on the laws, policy and procedures that will guide through the assessment process of this case and how these can be used to meet the needs of all concerned. The assignment includes discussions on some of the key aspects of framework for the assessment of children in need and their families and The Children’s Act 1989, in particular section 17, duty to safeguard and I will incorporate anti-oppressive and anti-discriminatory practice.

Marginalisation involves the exclusion and isolation of the young person sector, from the political, social and economic mainstreams of the world. Particularly the youth experience much higher rates of unemployment, and very often are deemed unsuccessful due to certain societal pressures and influences that will be discussed within this essay.