Agreeing And Disagreeing Is The Way We Communicate With One Another

The opposing side disagrees that face to face interactions can solve conflicts. It is true that not everyone will have their problems resolved by using this form of communication. Countries are too overpopulated to resolve their conflicts. There are other ways of agreeing on one idea. The opposite side concludes that face to face is not an effective problem solving

Think back to a time in class when there was an open-ended discussion. The teacher would start the discussion with a question or topic and the class would respond accordingly. Usually each question or topic had multiple points of view. The discussion would start when a peer would state their point of view and then another would either support that idea or contradict it with something else. There would be no right or wrong answer, but it would bring to light many suggestions most people in the class would not have thought of on their own. New ideas are born through discussions and opinions. Thinking about and accepting other’s opinions is how we grow and mature. That doesn’t mean we have to agree with them, it just means we have to give their opinions some thought and respect them. Maybe they

to think that everybody will have the same opinion on all matters. But, it is

Group members can achieve consensus in their decision making when they follow all of these steps except

• To manage a disagreement there can be no winners or losers as the resolution must benefit all sides.

Many different points of view are spoken, each with their own opinions.

By being able to accept a variety of different things any person can become smarter and more respectful to other things. Because of this, acceptance would be a very important part of anyone or

A group discussion will commence if there is to be a dispute or disagreement on a subject. The members involved with the argument shall thoroughly explain or state their side of a given argument. The remaining members shall then vote on a single side or form a compromise.

History has shown that humans tend to treat each other with disrespect and intolerance. Most of that disrespect comes from opinions that differ. Opposing views and beliefs have caused people to go to the extremes to prove their correctness. Some are willing to go to war to defend his or her opinion, while some are willing to “agree to disagree.” Depending on the topic, how people react changes: from mild disagreement to violent action.

How we as human beings must be willing to accept people and opinions that are different

Many people believe that the more they listen to those whom they disagree with, the more probability to convince opponents to accept their own positions. This perspective, however, holds only a little truth because opponents’ opinions do not always deserve to be listened to. In addition, listening is devoid of effectiveness to persuade opponents. Therefore, it is more crucial to speak than to listen in attempting to persuade others.

After some healthy discussion, we always could reach consensus. While I had my doubts initially about our group, we must have been doing something right, for “to use consensus effectively, the group must have a trusting, cooperative, atmosphere” (Zastrow, 2015, p. 218).

Dawes (1990) determined, the False Consensus Effect (FCE) as an egoistic bias that causes people to perceive that others from their own social groups support similar perceptions and ideas regarding a particular prospect. For example; a person who enjoys watching a TV show and finds it to be the funniest might generalise his perception to others as well. He might oversimplify that fact that the show he watches is the funniest. In simpler words, the idea that everyone thinks in the same way as we do, when most often they do not, is termed as The False Consensus Effect (Taylor, 2011).

Communication within one cultural group sharing traditions and national or regional identity is often effortless. The social and cultural meanings between the same cultures in regard to communication are understood the way they are intended. When discourse happens within members of the same social groups; they will communicate, talk, discuss in similar places that all members of that culture attend or visit like bars, schools, shopping malls, community meetings, party events, the office, etc. The meaning arrived at or the knowledge and accepted truth toward an issue is more or less the consensus of a

Negotiation is the process of two individuals or groups reaching joint agreement about differing needs or ideas. Oliver (1996) described negotiation as "negotiators jointly searching a multidimensional space and then agreeing to a single point in the space." Negotiation is a form of conflict resolution. When we negotiate, the first thing that needs to be established is whether we have two or more parties that have a common objective, but also differ in ideas when it comes to how they achieve the objective. The principle behind negotiating is to finding the middle ground that is suitable for both parties involved. Not all negotiation ends in satisfactory compromise, sometimes negotiations can take a long time to conclude