Akhenaten: A Short Story

Aye was killed after four years and Tey marry Horemheb. Sense Tey and Aye did not had any children Tey could marry who ever she wanted and will become King of Egypt.Sense Horemheb could not marry Aye he had to kill Aye and marry Tey. So Tey marry Horemheb and made him King of Egypt. That is my final reason how horemheb killed King Tut.

There is much that is known about Akhenaten the heretic pharaoh. More lies in speculation. Since his time, the Amarna period is one the ancient Egyptians themselves wished to forget much about Akhenaten remains unknown. What we do know is often confusing, different hypothesis piled upon each other make it difficult to distinguish what is fact and what speculation.

The capital was changed from Thebes to Armana, and Akhenaten put all of his efforts into the religious transition, neglecting domestic and foreign affairs. As the power struggle between old and new intensified, Akhenaten became more autocratic and his regime more corrupt. Following a 17-year reign, he was gone, probably forced to abdicate, and died soon after. His 9-year-old son, Tutankhaten, took over around 1332 B.C.E. Foreign policy had also been neglected during Akhenaten's reign, and Tutankhamun sought to restore better relations with ancient Egypt's neighbors. While there is some evidence to suggest that Tutankhamun's diplomacy was successful, during his reign, battles took place between Egypt and the Nubians and Asiatics over territory and control of trade routes.

They were powerful. They were huge. They were brave. They loved their leader Sargon. These men were the Akkadians and they had two big accomplishments. And because of him, they were destined for greatness. The first great accomplishment was when the Akkadians conquered Sumer. The other was how well they could keep control of Sumer.

King Tut got mad at the Hittites and they went to war. King Tut had a very bad broken leg and his tomb was far away from where he died. King Tut had a cut on his cheek so he could of got shot in the back of the head with a arrow and fell and broke his leg and cut his cheek. The Hittites were all aiming for King Tut because the two Kings were mad at eachother.

King tut died by being hit by a chariot .I believe so, king tut had been hurt alot but these few all fall into place.He had a badly fractured/ broken leg on the left side,crushed ribs on the left side And a fracture in the skull. This leads me to think he got hit by a chariot on the left side while kneeling to shoot an animal. Why because only so much force can cause that much damage.

King Tutankhamen also known as King Tut was born in 1341 BC and died in 1323 BC. Akhenaten(King Tut’s father) birthday is unknown, but he died in 1335 BC. King Tut is known most for his tomb. “The most fascinating item found in King Tut’s tomb was the stone sarcophagus containing three coffins, one inside the other, with a final coffin made of gold. When the lid of the third coffin was raised, King Tut's royal mummy was revealed, preserved for more than 3,000 years. As archaeologists examined the mummy, they found other artifacts, including bracelets, rings and collars.” The tomb was discovered by Howard Carter in 1922. When Carter discovered it, it was untouched. Most of what we know about Egyptian history came from the tomb. Akhenaten and King Tut were both pharaohs, but had two different styles of ruling. Akhenaten made radical changes. These radical changes led to “his characterisation as the first individual in history”. King Tut was the complete opposite. This paper will prove that Tutankhamen took the necessary steps to legitimize his rule after the chaotic rule of his father.

I think that King Tut’s death was caused by assassination. Horemheb must have murdered him because he erased Tut’s name from the list of Pharaohs. Therefore, Horemheb must have had something against Tut. After King Tut died, Horemheb became a close advisor of the new Pharaoh. This means that he supports the new ruler more than he supports King Tut. I know that King Tut couldn’t have been in a chariot accident because he had club foot, so he couldn’t even stand in the chariot. This leads to the fact that King Tut was

In ancient civilizations, the rulers were the backbone that tried to hold everything together. The rulers had to make laws, lead the citizens, and maintain order. There are many other things they had to do, but those are just three of the main ones. In most civilizations these rulers were called kings, but in Ancient Egypt the kings, or rulers, were also called pharaohs. One of these pharaohs was a boy that went by the name of King Tutankhamun, or King Tut for short. This young king is perhaps one of the best known pharaohs of this time period. In order to find out why King Tutankhamun is so well known we can look at his early life, his time in power, and his death.

Was King tut murdered? His wife Ankhesenamun could have killed him or maybe his servant Aye! King tut was found with a ripped cheek and a broken femur. Only a great force could have broken King tut’s femur.He was alive when his femur was broken. Also he had a blow to the back of his head. But,where did it come from? he could have fallen or he was purposely hit.

There is a large amount of medical evidence supporting this theory also. A computed axial tomography scan was done in 2005 showing that Tutankhamun died with an open wound fracture on his left leg. Within the bone, when the mummified body was examined, they found resin which was used by the Ancient Egyptians to preserve the body so the wound had to have been obtained around the time of his death otherwise the resin would not have found it’s way into the young King’s bone. In 2013 Ultimate Tut, a documentary dedicated to solving the mystery of the King Tut’s death, was released. With this new information was also released accordingly showing us that the severe trauma shown on Tutankhamun matches that of a person who has been run over by a chariot

The first theory is that King Tut was murdered by his advisor. Aye, King Tut's advisor, may have wanted the throne for himself. After analyzing some evidence I found that King Tut had no blood relatives, so if he passed away the throne would go to his most trusted advisor, which was Aye. Further supporting my theory of Aye murdering Tut, was the message his wife sent to the Hittites, an enemy of Egypt. In the message she begged for them to send a prince to Egypt, possibly as a last resort so Aye will not become the king.

Yesterday, a new pharaoh took the throne. He seemed to be more worthy than his father at least. He is very smart, and he seems like he will use is power for good. He asked for a blessing to be a good king, and as normal, I gave him the blessing. “May you be an intelligent, strong, and Generous pharaoh”. The pharaoh’s name is Tutankhamun. His father, Akhenaten tried to make Egypt believe in one god. Honestly, I don’t think that was very wise. An entire civilization is believing in thousands of gods, and you try to make them believe in one. Not smart, not smart at all. Anyways, He is very young. 9 years old, I

Tut one day was riding on his chariot to his hunting grounds when he mysteriously he fell off his chariot. He ended up hitting his head and scratching his cheek. What happened was Aye, and Ankhesenamun had sabotaged his chariot before tut left, but he didn't die from this blow to his head. This blow to his head can be shown on his x-rays. A week later Ankhesenamun and Aye took him on a trip. They had brought a golden with them and used it to stab Tut in his leg and he bled

Despite more than a thousand years passing the Byzantine piece Emperor Justinian and His Attendants shares many aspects with the ancient Egyptian piece Akhenaten and His Family. Not only do they share the same title layout with “The ruler of a country and His other figures” but they also share formal, religious, and historical aspects. Visually they have their own unique style with a couple small similarities, symbolically they both use symbols in relation to the ruler and the countries monotheistic religion, and historically they both experienced the destruction of art like them. By examining these two pieces of art from their respective times and culture it is easy to the similarities and differences.