Alex Williams Argument Analysis

Nicholas Carr Claimed that the internet affects our information processing. Carr backed up his argument by speaking with a wide array of educated and reputable people like friends, colleagues, a blogger, GMU and a professor making his argument validity greater. Carr admits that he and his friends also; have the same problem by saying that he was appealing to emotions by using Ethos.

Throughout my project I used multiple different rhetorical strategies to argue my claims. My audience is my peers in AP language and composition, and my purpose is to convince them that the name that was given by our parents influences our life. One rhetorical choice I made was to include a lot of different evidence to back up my claim. I included various experiments that were done and analyzed the results. This is an effective strategy because my audience would know that I have proof to show that names influence how people act toward you and how it determines our futures. Including a lot of evidence and proof boosts my credibility high so my audience will believe me and my argument more easily. Another rhetorical strategy that I made to develop

Williams is illogical in his presentation of facts and figures, which does not aid his argument. The University of North Caroline presents a handout on statistics which helps writers know the proper use for them in a paper and has the following questions to ask yourself about the research: “What is the data’s background? Does your evidence come from reliable sources? Are all data reported? Have the data been interpreted correctly?” Williams fails to answer these questions, for example, “The Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs commissioned a civic education poll among public school students. A surprising 77% didn't know that George Washington was the first President; couldn't name Thomas Jefferson as the author of the Declaration of Independence; and only 2.8% of the students actually passed the citizenship test. Along similar lines, the Goldwater Institute of Phoenix did the same survey and only 3.5% of

The most frequently used of all types of arguments used in the article is Ethos, many statistics and sources are used. This article does an excellent job at debunking these myths without coming off as rude or biased. Hoff Sommers states the

In the sporting society there are many opinions and statements about athletes and which person is at the top of the league. A common argument that often appears on the sporting networks is who is the next Micheal Jordan? Many people used to think Derrick Rose would be, until his mishap of injuries. Nowadays the common argument is, “ Who is the better athlete? Lebron James or Kevin Durant?” Although Durant has been able to carry his team throughout many years, James is a very well rounded player, he’s been found at the point, bottom of the key and even on the far wing for the 3!

In document 1, George Kennan arguments are that the USRR sees capitalism as an enemy, therefore, it cannot coexist with the rest of the world. He states that the Soviets want to dominate the world. as a result, he proposed a policy of containment where the United States and its allies should find ways to reduce the spread of communism around the world.

Jessie Little Doe Baird is an incredible linguist whose groundbreaking work at MIT helped to bring back the said to be death language of the Wampanoag indians of Massachusetts. She is working to bring the language more into the light and the ancient culture as well by teaching classes, creating programs, and even a dictionary for the words of the language. This work can help us to understand an article previously discussed in class by James clifford, on the Mashpee indian tribe. This article was about the disagreement over whether or not the Mashpee indians were considered to be an official tribe. They had been told that since they had been so integrated into modern society, by marriage, migration, language, and religion, that they no longer held a tribal culture nor legal tribal status. The proclaimed Mashpee tribe attempted to fight this, with arguments that their land was stipped from them in the past and that their culture was still alive. In the end, the verdict was that since the Mashpee had lost their tribal status years ago, they could no longer be considered a tribe.

The Yankee’s claim was an Abuse of a Slippery Slope Argument because between the two notions of the boy being innocent and the building falling down, the former can be backed up by evidence and is far more plausible than the latter based purely off of supposition. What he should’ve done was say that if if his only evidence for supposing the defendant was not guilty was because it was possible, then his argument would not be very strong.

Staying informed on public issues, data and statistics will help a person’s credibility in an argument. He said it’s beneficial, but numbers don’t always convince people. Sharing stories and personal experiences with racism and oppression has a lasting effect.

The author begins building his or her credibility by putting rhetorical questions, putting a study example that has been done, and the author successfully employs logic appeals but lacks pathos, which makes her purpose unclear.

Second, he keeps a very serious tone throughout the whole book to keep the information he is giving you sounding credible and professional. And last he uses interviews and various other information gathering techniques like attending one of

When reading both sides of the argument “Filling America’s need for skilled workers,” the side that had the most effective argument was the Con side. It uses rhetorical devices, logical reasoning and a good counter argument. Those three things lead to a good and effective argument and also supports a claim. By using rhetorical devices it can make the article persuasively and effectively appeal to the readers. Logical reasoning uses analysis to help writers invent, demonstrate, and prove arguments. And a good counter argument gives the reader a chance to respond to your objections before they have finished reading.

Not only do dissatisfied customers take away valuable resources, but they also lower employee satisfaction. Altercations that are caused by abrasive shoppers demotivate the staff to do their job. Huffington Post describes a Texan who made it vivid that customers should be treated equally. He goes on to state, “You can’t treat your employees like serfs. You have to value them ... If they think that you won’t support them when a customer is out of line, even the smallest problem can cause resentment.? “(-----). The basis of Gordon Bethune argument is that the employees that were hired are hard working in their positions. With this in mind, siding with the customer would make the staff as if they were not valued.

The most convincing argument on the opposing side to me was Tom’s. Tom argued that religion is not the most dangerous source of conflict in the 21st century. Instead, Tom suggested that economic and social stability is more to blame for conflict in the world today. He also argued that the fact that countries have nuclear weapons at their reach poses the bigger chance on conflict in the world. I do believe that scarcity put people on edge and causes people to form alliances and take other people resources, ultimately doing whatever it take for them to survive.

This article is talk about Kath’s ethics. He support the idea is effects and accomplishes are not cause good or bad for goodwill.Kath think they are goodwill is only thing for goods.It means it is about themselves values.The second part is talk about imperatives.The imperatives is divide by hypothetical and categorical.In the article is talk about categorical imperatives.They main introduce the commands of morality.