Alexander The Great DBQ

I think Alexander the Great was not great because he made bad decisions, was cruel to his men, and he was very greedy. So do you think Alexander the Great was great? Or do you think he doesn't deserve the title “Great”. What truly makes someone “great”? Everyone has their own opinion, but I think he

Alexander the Great was one of the courageous leader and compelling idealistic of all time, he managed to conquer large Greece Empire with small reasonable resources. Alexander was a great soldier with different military strategies which helped him and his soldiers to defeat enemies. He was able to invade the Persian army that was massively twice stronger and bigger than his empire. He took control all over Greece and conquered Persia, Egypt and all the way to India. Alexander the Great left legacies that can describe and portray in many ways based on his accomplishments.

Was Alexander the Great really great? To earn the title great, he must have done something astounding. Alexander the Great had fulfilled many goals in his life which made him one of the world's most impactful leaders, resulting from his education, his amazing military training, which lead to his many strategic accomplishments, and through transforming the Greek culture. First, Alexander received education in science, geography, and literature by Aristotle. He also learned many military techniques. Second, Alexander accomplished what no others could, he conquered the Persian Empire in just 3 years, which stood for 2 centuries. Third, Alexander impacted the Greek culture and started a new age, the Hellenistic age, this was a time of peace when

To be great is to be exceptional in a way. Many people throughout history have been considered great. Whether it is because of their political prowess, academic intelligence, or militaristic achievement or a combination of the three. It seems that people were considered great significantly more in the past. Maybe it was because people were better or because now people have extremely high standards. However, some people who lived in the past even with today's standards would be considered great. Alexander the Great was truly deserving of his title because he expanded from Greece, down to Egypt, and across to India, he also was a wise a brave military leader, and he began the Hellenistic age by merging Persian, Indian, Greek, and Egyptian cultures.

Alexander the Great was well known for his amazing achievements. Alexander’s father died when he was only 20 years old, so he became the king. He was born in Macedonia in 356 B.C.E., in a kingdom near the northern edge of Greece (BGE). When he died he had conquered 70 cities within 10 years (Doc E). Alexander thought so highly of himself that he thought he could conquer Persia, Asia Minor, Egypt, and many other places (BGE). Was Alexander the Great as intelligent and encouraging as people said he was? He was great for these 3 reasons he founded many cities, he was brave, and he spread Greek culture throughout many different places!

When the Peloponnesian war happened between Athens and Sparta, the Greeks were weakened enough to be taken over by the Macedonians. Philip II thought it was a great idea to take over the Greek city states and fight against the Persians. Once Philip II died, a new Macedonian king was brought to heir. The heirs name was Alexander the Great. There is two different standpoints on Alexander, was he great or was he bad? We should all believe that Alexander does deserve the title Alexander the Great because he has done many good things. The reasons are that Alexander showed mercy to the people he conquered, Alexander left the people's culture alone but tried to spread Greek culture, Alexander was interested in others cultures, and that Alexander

Alexander the great is a strong leader for taking over 70 cities. He was born in 356 B.C.E in Macedonia. By the age of 20, he took his father throne. His journey took him 8 years and claimed 70 cities. After all his greatness, he died by a fever in 323 B.C.E. How great was Alexander the Great? Alexander was great because he was a military genius and a inspiring leader.

Was Alexander great or was he a selfish leader? Alexander was a great leader. He was a war leader who took over most of Persia. He was great because he was a inspiring leader, a military genius, and he spread culture.

Alexander gained lots of respect from many people. Although he did become a king at the age of 20, he learned to respect other cultures and have leadership over his army (BGE). Alexander was born in 356 BCE in a kingdom along the edge of northern Greece called Macedonia. His father King Philip and mother Olympia, wanted alexander prepared for his kingship. They resolved this by hiring a philosopher named Aristotle to teach him many academic subjects. Was Alexander great or not great? Alexander was magnificent because he had amazing leadership skills, he made many remarkable achievements, and he had creativity. By these measures Alexander was successful because he took leadership of his troops, he also had remarkable achievements because ruled over an empire at the age of 20, and creativity that kept porous puzzled while making noises to distract Porus’s troop.

Also he thought highly of himself, like he thought that he was a god. Some people ask themselves was Alexander really great, yes he is. Alexander was great for these reasons, his leadership ,cared for others ,and his military strategy. Alexander was great because he showed leadership. Alex had 40,000 men fighting for hims during the wars he had.(Doc.

Alexander the Great is widely regarded as the most successful conqueror to ever live. But did he really deserve the title of “great”? This is disputable, considering his dad did a large portion of the work, he was mentally unstable, and just an overall jerk. I do not believe Alexander was deserving of his given legacy.

The first matter to consider is what constitutes “greatness”. There are no set standards no checklist, to apply to a person, to determine it they are “great.” The simplest way that I could conceive to decide whether this title should apply to Alexander was to determine if he was, in some way, superior to the rulers that came before or after his reign. The most obvious place for me to start my consideration is with Alexander’s vast accomplishments as a conquerer.

Do you think Alexander ¨The Great¨ deserves the name ¨The Great?¨ I don't think that Alexander needs a big name to make him seem more powerful. Alexander has done many bad things in his life, including being a Alcoholic, Judging people's religion, and, he didn't treat his citizens right . Does he really deserve that powerful name?

Was Alexander III of Macedonia really worthy of the title “”Great” or was he just a megalomaniac conditioned into this belief by his followers? Well, if you consider his military legacy which is almost as large as the swath of territory he conquered spanning from modern day Greece to northern India, or the fact that his over 2,000 year old combat tactics are still being taught at military academies the world over, I don’t believe the word “great” would be too far from imagination. When Alexander rose to power following the death of his father, Phillip II, his kingdom of Macedonia encompassed all of the land that we know as modern Greece. For Alexander this was not enough. Phillip II is believed to have prophesized s his son’s ambitions with the words, “My son you must find a kingdom big enough for your ambition. Macedon is too small for you.” after Alexander tamed his wild buck Bucephalas at age 10.

Alexander the Great or not?In my opinion Alexander does not deserve the title the Great for the most part. Alexander did many things wrong and I am going to tell you why I think Alexander didn’t deserve the title and why I think did deserve the title.