Alexander The Great DBQ

Also he thought highly of himself, like he thought that he was a god. Some people ask themselves was Alexander really great, yes he is. Alexander was great for these reasons, his leadership ,cared for others ,and his military strategy. Alexander was great because he showed leadership. Alex had 40,000 men fighting for hims during the wars he had.(Doc.

Was Alexander great or was he a selfish leader? Alexander was a great leader. He was a war leader who took over most of Persia. He was great because he was a inspiring leader, a military genius, and he spread culture.

Alexander the great is a strong leader for taking over 70 cities. He was born in 356 B.C.E in Macedonia. By the age of 20, he took his father throne. His journey took him 8 years and claimed 70 cities. After all his greatness, he died by a fever in 323 B.C.E. How great was Alexander the Great? Alexander was great because he was a military genius and a inspiring leader.

Alexander gained lots of respect from many people. Although he did become a king at the age of 20, he learned to respect other cultures and have leadership over his army (BGE). Alexander was born in 356 BCE in a kingdom along the edge of northern Greece called Macedonia. His father King Philip and mother Olympia, wanted alexander prepared for his kingship. They resolved this by hiring a philosopher named Aristotle to teach him many academic subjects. Was Alexander great or not great? Alexander was magnificent because he had amazing leadership skills, he made many remarkable achievements, and he had creativity. By these measures Alexander was successful because he took leadership of his troops, he also had remarkable achievements because ruled over an empire at the age of 20, and creativity that kept porous puzzled while making noises to distract Porus’s troop.

Alexander the Great was great because is his 13 year reign he founded 70 cities. When Alexander died his empire was about 2,000,000 square miles (Doc E). He was an intelligent man when it came

To be great is to be exceptional in a way. Many people throughout history have been considered great. Whether it is because of their political prowess, academic intelligence, or militaristic achievement or a combination of the three. It seems that people were considered great significantly more in the past. Maybe it was because people were better or because now people have extremely high standards. However, some people who lived in the past even with today's standards would be considered great. Alexander the Great was truly deserving of his title because he expanded from Greece, down to Egypt, and across to India, he also was a wise a brave military leader, and he began the Hellenistic age by merging Persian, Indian, Greek, and Egyptian cultures.

I think Alexander the Great was not great because he made bad decisions, was cruel to his men, and he was very greedy. So do you think Alexander the Great was great? Or do you think he doesn't deserve the title “Great”. What truly makes someone “great”? Everyone has their own opinion, but I think he

When the Peloponnesian war happened between Athens and Sparta, the Greeks were weakened enough to be taken over by the Macedonians. Philip II thought it was a great idea to take over the Greek city states and fight against the Persians. Once Philip II died, a new Macedonian king was brought to heir. The heirs name was Alexander the Great. There is two different standpoints on Alexander, was he great or was he bad? We should all believe that Alexander does deserve the title Alexander the Great because he has done many good things. The reasons are that Alexander showed mercy to the people he conquered, Alexander left the people's culture alone but tried to spread Greek culture, Alexander was interested in others cultures, and that Alexander

Some people say Alexander the Great was a good leader, others think otherwise. I will show you that Alexander the Great was in fact not a great leader and ruler over his empire. Alexander was a ruthless and brutal leader to put it in the simplest terms. Alexander was a very severe leader for many reasons. Alexander the Great had everything handed to him because his dad was King Philip II. He had conquered many lands and had a well-trained army, and to his detriment Alexander inherited them directly from his dad after he was assassinated. Overall, Alexander the Great was not that Great.

Alexander the Great is widely regarded as the most successful conqueror to ever live. But did he really deserve the title of “great”? This is disputable, considering his dad did a large portion of the work, he was mentally unstable, and just an overall jerk. I do not believe Alexander was deserving of his given legacy.

The first matter to consider is what constitutes “greatness”. There are no set standards no checklist, to apply to a person, to determine it they are “great.” The simplest way that I could conceive to decide whether this title should apply to Alexander was to determine if he was, in some way, superior to the rulers that came before or after his reign. The most obvious place for me to start my consideration is with Alexander’s vast accomplishments as a conquerer.

Was Alexander III of Macedonia really worthy of the title “”Great” or was he just a megalomaniac conditioned into this belief by his followers? Well, if you consider his military legacy which is almost as large as the swath of territory he conquered spanning from modern day Greece to northern India, or the fact that his over 2,000 year old combat tactics are still being taught at military academies the world over, I don’t believe the word “great” would be too far from imagination. When Alexander rose to power following the death of his father, Phillip II, his kingdom of Macedonia encompassed all of the land that we know as modern Greece. For Alexander this was not enough. Phillip II is believed to have prophesized s his son’s ambitions with the words, “My son you must find a kingdom big enough for your ambition. Macedon is too small for you.” after Alexander tamed his wild buck Bucephalas at age 10.

Alexander the Great or not?In my opinion Alexander does not deserve the title the Great for the most part. Alexander did many things wrong and I am going to tell you why I think Alexander didn’t deserve the title and why I think did deserve the title.

Throughout history, Alexander III of Macedon, commonly referred to as Alexander the Great throughout history, has been thought of by many to be an enlightened thinker, multiculturalist, an ambitious, egotistical tyrant, and conqueror through evidence recorded, and passed along through generations. It is arguable, through evidence, that Alexander the Great was the most successful, greatest war leader, genius, and ruler there ever was.

If you look up the word great in the dictionary you would see something along the lines of superior, big, or excellent. Alexander the great was not all that great in my eyes. He inherited his empire after his dad was killed and became king of Macedonia at the young age of 20. (Spielvogel, 2015, p. 76) When he was planning to attack the Persian empire thousands died.