Alexander The Great DBQ

To start off, Alexander the Great was great because he was a military genius. In document B, it explains how he tricked Porus into thinking that he was going to attack when he was not. When Alexander actually attacks, Porus will not be prepared. Alexander the Great

Alexander was great because he had good strategy when it came to his military. In Document B it shows Alexander using his cleverness with his military strategy. Alexander had confused Porus by moving his troops on one side of the river, and then Porus started to mirror Alexander’s movement on the other side of the river. Porus was expecting an attack every time Alexander moved his troops.

Alexander the Great was not great because he made bad decisions. One bad decision he made was, in the legend of the helmet (Document D), his men offer him the helmet with water inside. Instead of not accepting it so his men could have

One reason that Alexander doesn’t deserve to be called great is that, he slaughter thousands of people. In document C, it states that, “Two thousands men of military age were crucified.” The evidence shows that many people were killed while he was growing his empire. Also, the evidence shows that he is mean because many people were killed in the fighting.

To be great is to be exceptional in a way. Many people throughout history have been considered great. Whether it is because of their political prowess, academic intelligence, or militaristic achievement or a combination of the three. It seems that people were considered great significantly more in the past. Maybe it was because people were better or because now people have extremely high standards. However, some people who lived in the past even with today's standards would be considered great. Alexander the Great was truly deserving of his title because he expanded from Greece, down to Egypt, and across to India, he also was a wise a brave military leader, and he began the Hellenistic age by merging Persian, Indian, Greek, and Egyptian cultures.

Alexander should not have been called great, because of the many people he killed, and the land he

There is a legend where he and his army are in the desert, and instead of drinking the precious little water reserved for him, he poured in out onto the ground (Doc D). This gesture inspired his army and kept them going through the hard times. You could argue his greatness by saying that he was a general who knew how to keep his troops going through remarkably difficult and trying times. Another legend says that at sea one day, Alexander lost his crown in the wind and a sailor swam out to retrieve it. In order for it to stay dry, the sailor had to keep it on his head. The man was given a reward for saving the crown but then was put to death because the only head that the crown could ever touch must be royal (Doc D). One could use this document to argue that Alexander was even cruel to his own people. The truth is that there are two sides to every story. If you define someone as one thing, you are bound to get debates about whether or not that one thing was true throughout their life.

One reason that Alexander was not as great as he sounds is because he killed 100,000 people in only 4 major battles. As said in document E, Alexander killed many, many people in order to take over their land. That shows how rude he can be, killing people for what he only really cares about, their land. According to document C, “Alexander ordered that all except those who sought sanctuary (safety in temple) were to be slain.” Document C also stated “Seven thousand Tyrians died… and the number would have been far higher had it

Secondly, Alexander wasn’t great because he was ruthless. In Document E it states, “Estimated enemy soldiers and civilians killed in four major battles was 100,000” (Doc. E). The documents proves that Alexander wasn’t great because that was only the number of enemies of Alexander, and it didn’t include his own soldiers he forced to go into 4 major battles, probably killing thousands of soldiers each battle. He also went and killed innocent civilians who had nothing to do with the fighting, but were still killed in the battle. In addition, Document B stays, “...Alexander then threw his calvary in a circle around the entire force, and ordered the infantry to lock shields, to group tightly and to advance as a phalanx…” (Doc. B). This fact proves

Alexander the great is a strong leader for taking over 70 cities. He was born in 356 B.C.E in Macedonia. By the age of 20, he took his father throne. His journey took him 8 years and claimed 70 cities. After all his greatness, he died by a fever in 323 B.C.E. How great was Alexander the Great? Alexander was great because he was a military genius and a inspiring leader.

“Alexander, like everyone else, was tormented by by thirst, but he was nonetheless marching one foot at his men.” (Doc. D). Although Alexander was exhausted just like the others, he still went out of his way to lead his army to greatness. “The army was crossing a desert of sand; the sun was already blazing down upon them, but they were struggling on under the necessity of reaching water, which was still far away.” (Doc.D). Despite the fact that Alexander had to deal with the harsh conditions, he was still determined to win. At no time would he let his army down, he was there to support, and advise them. Alexander influenced his followers with his ways of

Alexander the Great, born of King Philip of Macedonia, was one of the greatest conquerors of history. In my opinion, Alexander was a great leader and warrior. For example, in Document B, Alexander used strategy to win over a battle. The strategy he used was complicated, but well thought out; Alexander moved his troops in all different directions to keep Porus puzzled, and took his cavalry to various points along the river bank where he would create a war cry so that Porus would parallel the movements on the other sides of the river until he no longer responded. Now Porus elephants were boxed in, and the elephants trampled their own men because they had no driver's upon them. In this way Alexander won a battle, and through his cleverness, he

Courage is only thing that Alexander the Great definitely had. He stayed strong in the empire's weakest times. Living in the world that this empire took place was very tough. Many empires and city-states want power more than anything else. Alexander had the ability to conquer more land than any other empire in ancient times (Doc A and C).

Alexander was great because he leaded his men into a fighting zone but he prepared it to attack his enemy. It is true that Alexander had some bad points. For example “they scooped up with difficulty what they could and hurried back to Alexander then, just before they reached him, they tipped the water into a helmet and gave it to him. Alexander, with a word of thanks for the gift, took the helmet and , in full view of his troops, poured the water on the ground.” (Doc D).

After 300 years Julius Caesar cried for Alexander because he accomplished so much at a young age. Alexander was great because he was an inspiring leader and a military genius. Alexander was great because he was an inspiring leader to many people. Alexander was a great inspiring leader for example in document A it says ¨Alexander was stopped-not by enemy,but by his own army...