Alexander The Great Research Paper

Alexander the Great is without doubt one of the greatest military leaders of history. Not only did Alexander of Macedon conquer enormous areas of the known world but also he demonstrated dynamic leadership and masterful strategy on a large scale and tactics on the battlefield. During his life, he ruled the largest empire the world had ever seen, which stretched from ancient Greece to India. The son of King Phillip II of Macedon, Alexander was educated by the philosopher Aristotle and first led Macedonian troops at age 18. Many times Alexander was worshipped as a god in some of the countries he ruled. He had a huge impact on world history spreading the seeds of western culture and philosophy across the world and has legends and stories

Alexander the Great had an amazing political and military mind. With the tutelage of his father, Philip II, and a great education, he became one of the best leaders of all time. And even as a boy, many knew Alexander’s destiny was to rule.

One reason that Alexander doesn’t deserve to be called great is that, he slaughter thousands of people. In document C, it states that, “Two thousands men of military age were crucified.” The evidence shows that many people were killed while he was growing his empire. Also, the evidence shows that he is mean because many people were killed in the fighting.

A lot of individuals argued if Alexander the Great was great or not great. Alexander the Great was great to his empire and did everything he could to expand his empire. Alexander was born more than 300 years before Jesus was born. He was only 20 when he launched his first invasion of the Persian Empire. The death of Darius was important to Alexander’s conquest to Persia since it would make it easier to rule his people. Alexander’s army was the one that told him to stop and it caused him to march back and it was not even his enemy after eight years of conquest and combat. Alexander the Great was great because he was courageous for his people and intelligent to create ideas to protect his people. Although some may argue that Alexander doesn’t

There is a legend where he and his army are in the desert, and instead of drinking the precious little water reserved for him, he poured in out onto the ground (Doc D). This gesture inspired his army and kept them going through the hard times. You could argue his greatness by saying that he was a general who knew how to keep his troops going through remarkably difficult and trying times. Another legend says that at sea one day, Alexander lost his crown in the wind and a sailor swam out to retrieve it. In order for it to stay dry, the sailor had to keep it on his head. The man was given a reward for saving the crown but then was put to death because the only head that the crown could ever touch must be royal (Doc D). One could use this document to argue that Alexander was even cruel to his own people. The truth is that there are two sides to every story. If you define someone as one thing, you are bound to get debates about whether or not that one thing was true throughout their life.

Alexander the Great was the king of Macedonia, conqueror of the Persian Empire, and one of the greatest military geniuses of all times. Even at an early age, Alexander had the promise to become a great leader. Through all his victories and conquests, he has become a great hero and has had a large impact on history. That is why I chose he book Alexander the Great, by J.R. Hamilton for my review. Hamilton does a very good job with the story of Alexander the Great.

Alexander was a great leader because when Alexander and his men was crossing a hot desert all of Alexander men was thirsty but they gave Alexander water (Document D). Instead of drinking the water Alexander poured the water on the ground because he does not think that he was better than his men. He showed that he was equal to his men. Alexander was also a great military leader, he led his men into many defeats while he was outnumbered in all of his battles. Alexander was able to conquer many empires.

Alexander the Great and Darius battle demonstrates to us that bigger is not always better. Alexander was more engaged in having a plan to win the battle, and Darius just wanted to fight and win. The great thinking of Alexander helped him win this battle. Alexander knew that he should not push all his soldiers out at the same time. Alexander trained his soldiers well, they knew where to be, and when to strike. In order for Alexander and the soldiers to be successful, they first had to be discipline and have the confidence in Alexander their leader. Alexander was sure that his soldiers could defeat their enemy because he used strategic planning. Alexander guided his men by giving them direction, and he made the decisions that would have his

Supposedly Alexander the Great was a very good leader, and I guess he was to some, but he is not a very good person when he is out of his king

When a rebellion took place, he gave the rebels a chance. When they didn’t want a peaceful ending, he made them pay for it. Even after the people defied him, he still gave them a chance. He gave a woman a pardon for showing courage. That shows that he admired his people. Also, he gave respect to persian beliefs. He let Persian governors rule, if they stayed loyal to Alexander. He was very smart. He let the local people rule because he couldn’t do it on his own. He did admire the culture and beliefs of other empires. He loved learning about the Indian people. Buddhism and Hinduism had fascinated him and how the Indian people wanted peace. Alexander was able to spread peace and influence and that’s why the word “great” can be associated with him.

Alexander III of Macedonia was born in July of 356 B.C.E. on the day of his birth King Philip II, Alexanders father, emerged victorious in a battle with the Illyrian and Paeonia armies, the same day that rumored to be the day the Temple of Artemis in Ephesus burned to the ground. During Alexander’s childhood he was raised in strict and fancy manner that only children of importance participated in. Until the young prince was sixteen he was tutored by the famous philosopher Aristotle. The young prince also learned the ways of battle and would eventually lead to the expansion of Macedonia. Was Alexander the Great solely responsible for the expansion of Macedonia after he received his father’s entire experienced army to take a battle and fight

Alexander the Great was one of the most influential characters in his time he helped unify most of the known world at the time and he preserved many ancient cities, sites, and architecture, but was this all in vain? Although, Alexander did accomplish many good things he was also very ruthless and cruel.

What Alexander did for his people was very great. He helped them a lot by leading his army and showed them how to fight. His army was well trained before he was king but he taught them with how he acted on the battle field.He told them to be brave and don't give up till the battle is over. Alexander the great showed his army how to stay strong and try your hardest. Alexander the great taught them new tactics of battle so

Alexander the Great is widely regarded as the most successful conqueror to ever live. But did he really deserve the title of “great”? This is disputable, considering his dad did a large portion of the work, he was mentally unstable, and just an overall jerk. I do not believe Alexander was deserving of his given legacy.

Alexander wanted to be treated like a god. He thought he was the son of Zeus, and went to extreme measures to prove it. He went to an oracle just be told that he was this son of a god. He was a very disrespectful to others and their cultures. When the Egyptians finished building this large city, he kicked them out. These people have worked long and hard to build this enormous city, only to be kicked out and not allowed to do anything about it. Alexander captured Thebans and sold them for slavery instead of having them for agriculture or military use.