Alexander The Great Research Paper

Alexander doesn't have concerns for others. According to Doc A, he made his army go on with him when they were tired and Alexander still made them go on with him. In Doc C, Alexander didn't have concerns for the civilians in Tyre, because he killed many of them. He killed, crucified and sold them into slavery. Alexander also made his army do what they didn't want to do, like ordering his army to marry Persian women and taking Darius's daughter as his

Alexander’s empire stretched from the Aegean Sea to the Indus River. (Doc. 3) The land he controlled had many different terrains and would have been different to obtain, but Alexander’s desire to control the “whole world” consumed him. Even when he controlled a large amount of land, he still wanted to gain more and more. (Doc. 2) With a feather-plumed helmet and himself on a horse in the very front of every battle, Alexander made himself an easy target for enemies. (Doc. 6) This is a brave and courageous gesture he made every battle and he knew the dangers of doing that, but still did it anyway. Alexander’s vast land he conquered connected many of these cities and eventually created the Hellenistic Era. In the city of Persepolis, Alexander took over and added it to his collection of cities he now controlled. (Doc. 4) Both saying positives and negatives about Alexander, the document remain

Alexander the Great was not great because he made bad decisions. One bad decision he made was, in the legend of the helmet (Document D), his men offer him the helmet with water inside. Instead of not accepting it so his men could have

While people may think that heroes have some bad things in their past, no hero has ever done what he did. According to A Hero’s Hero, “Here was a man, who walked in flesh and blood, a man who went on to conquer the whole world before he was thirty-two.”(1). A hero's job is to protect the world, and Alexander’s job was the opposite. He conquered the world, he didn’t protect it. Even more so is just how much he conquered, and what he had to do to conquer it. According to Alexander the Great, “A great conqueror, in 13 short years he amassed the largest empire in the entire ancient world — an empire that covered 3,000 miles.”(1). When a person conquers over 3,000 miles of land, one really cannot say that they are still a hero. Just think of what he had to do to get that much land… genocide. He had to inflict mass genocide amongst Asia. The blood that was spilled while the land was being taken over was ridiculous. And when a person does all of this, it’s hard to say that he’s a

Many people fail to realize that Alexander has had a definite affect on us today, although not as great as he would have had on people of the past. In most parts the world today, Alexander The Great is considered a legend; however, in some places, Alexander is considered a god. One of the most notable people in history, Alexander has reached an iconic status in our world today. He possibly may have even been referred to in the Quran (Surah 18:89-98). There are still many stories told about him including folktales, and movies. In modern Iran, Alexander is still known as an evil king who nearly destroyed the ancient Persian culture and religion. Although the effect of “Alexander Mania” has died down since the time of his reign, you can still see the mark that he has left on today’s world.

Throughout his life, he conquered many places, including the empire of Persia, Egypt, Mesopotamia, etc. He went on and on conquering many lands along with his troops. In fact, he travelled with builders, engineers, poets, scientists, etc. These specialized workers were one of the reasons he was successful in battles. Alexander brought them along for entertainment, and they also supported the army with carriages, supplies, built camps, and support for wounded soldiers. When attacking, his army led battles from the front which define their courage, and he ensured that his men were well-fed and rewarded them so that they were motivated. Alexander may be cruel at times. For instance, he killed lots and lots of men who were traitors in his army. Along with that, he treated his adversaries with respect while conquered people were freed when he’s generous, but killed when he’s disrespected. Alexander the Great defeated the powerful empire of Persia and extended his empire from Greece to India, making it the largest empire of the ancient

According to Doc B, he used this amazing strategy of faking attacks on the Hydaspes River to relax Porus (his enemy) and trick him. Then as soon as Porus fell for the trick, Alexander went on attack and ended up demolishing his army (Doc B). Another example is in Doc C, where he had defeated the Tyrians after they refused to surrender. The Tyrians would stay in front of their village and fight so Alexander sent his army in to burn down their town take their people (Doc C). Also, in chapter 30 in History Alive, Alexander would conquer people with terror and kindness. If people surrendered, he would still conquer them but would be nice and let them keep their leaders. If they refused, he would threaten to burn down their city (or actually do burn it down like you heard in Doc C). This evidence shows that Alexander was powerful because many people admire the strategies of Alexander the great. They were unique, and nobody else could come close to him in warfare at his time. This is one of the many reasons why he was

This information shows that Alexander wasn’t great was because conquered land for no reason. During all of the battles that took place to conquer some land thousands of people died. This unnecessary taking of land cost lives of the people trying to defend their lives and homes, the soldiers that were in Alexander’s army also lost their lives. The soldiers that were part of Alexander’s had to leave their families to go risk their lives for unnecessary land. Alexander had already conquered Persia when he continued on all the way to India.

After all the deaths and land stolen from others, his empire did not even last that long after he died. In Document E it states “Alexander’s empire held together… 10 years”. For how many death there where in his battles, it is not reasonable for him to take all that land. The part that does not make sense is that nobody in his empire took over. Alexander’s drive for battles sacrificed “Enemy soldiers and civilians… 100,000 killed” (Document E). That is so many family members hurt or killed. He ran four major battles from Europe to Asia to India and all through Africa. After he died his Empire just gave up on all the land they fought for.

One reason that Alexander should not have been privileged with the title “the great” is because his actions proved him as a cruel person. According to documents B, C, and D, he fought brutal and gruesome battles, also taking the time to kill mass amounts of the citizens in conquered cities. In those same documents, there was also evidence of treating his own troops

As seen in “World History, Patterns of Interaction”: Alexander promised his people a better life and said the expansion of his kingdom would be beneficial for them, “Alexander announced plans to organize and unify his empire. He would construct new cities, roads, and harbors and conquer Arabia” (145). His promises were empty and shortly after his death there was no sign that their new leaders, Ptolemy, Antigonus, and Seleucus would attempt to fulfill his pledge. Alexander’s facade, duty towards his people, was broken after his death, his failure to follow through on his promises is not that of a great leader. Document E is a chart of events under and after Alexander’s rule.

As stated in document A, “in 334 BCE, Alexander crossed from Macedonia to Asia with an army of 40,000.” That sounds like he is going to try to take over land and will not give up until he gets that land. According to document C, because the city Tyre, did not surrender, he built a bridge to get to the island. The city held out for 7 months but Alexander continued to destroy it, and the city’s people because he was so angry they were up for the battle. Alexander the great also took over 70 cities as said in document E. As you can tell, he was very greedy and seemed as if he could not help it but to keep destroying cities and taking over land. In conclusion, Alexander was overall very greedy and decided to take over land for no purpose other than he wanted

Do you ever wonder if Alexander the great was great? Alexander was great because he’s a military genius and an inspiring leader, and he speared culture. Alexander the great wasn’t always great. He did stuff in little time too.

Those who see Alexander in a negative manner obviously have quite strong opinions about it. They see him as more of a madman than the most powerful leader. It is easy to see where they get their assumptions from for they look at the bloodshed part of Alexander’s reign. Instead of focusing on the rare ability he had to conquer so

First of all, Alexander the Great was a villain because he’d conquer every land and city and kill the people and steal from them. For example, in the map, Campaigns and Empire of Alexander the Great , by K. Kianush, it shows the line where Alexander and his army went to conquer land. The line stretches far across Europe. It even goes into Egypt. This shows that Alexander was a villain.