Alienating the Community from Violence and the Legal Process Essay

Law and Order’s portrayal of the justice system further validated my preexisting notions of the flaws of the justice system, and also led me to an interesting realization; the episode seems to imply that the justice system’s spiteful, irrational response to violent crimes is, above all else, an indictment on society. Following the execution, District Attorney Adam Schiff is asked why he changed his stance on capital punishment. His response is clear: it wasn’t he who changed his mind; instead, “the people changed theirs” (“Aftershock”). The criminal justice system didn’t shape itself into the flawed institution that it has become; conversely, it was the general population’s insecurity and vengeance that really gave birth to this system. But why? As

The idea of violence is instilled in everyone’s head in some way or another. From the time we are born we are equipped with the idea that we must react when we are upset. When someone affects us in a negative way, there is an idea in our minds that urges us to fight back or cause harm to that person. This idea of causing harm stays with us from childhood until we take our last breath. Since 2013, there have been 242 school shootings within America. Even worse, there have been over a thousand mass shootings in the country resulting in mass casualties. Most recently, one single man murdered fifty-eight people at a concert in Las Vegas, Nevada and injured over 240 others. Although the motive may have been different between these shootings, one thing remains the same for all of them, the act of violence.

Violence, one of the biggest problem in the world right now, especially in America, where the gun control law are barely enforced, every citizen is at constant risk, considering the amount of people in this country that own guns. Crime and violence are rapidly becoming the prime epidemic in the U.S today, but what can we do to ensure our future generation’s safety?

Nothing accomplishes more to destroy our families than fierce crimes, weapons, groups, drugs, and the trepidation that strolls close by those fear. Savage crimes and casualty rights have turned into a noteworthy sympathy toward most residents in America. Insights demonstrate a decrease in savage crimes in our nation and an expansion in our national jail populace. Discharged detainees carry out most rough violations. Firearm control enactment, change programs, casualty rights mindfulness, and different projects are plenteous in our nation, yet do little to mitigate fierce crimes. On this paper I will try to display the liberals and traditionalist perspectives on this issue and on my own personal perspectives.

In conclusion, it has been demonstrated the social construction of the lawful and unlawful homicide by using the actions of the police officers in two different cases. In the Mark Duggan case, the lawfulness of the homicide was demonstrated by police officer complying with the theoretical outlooks of Beccaria and Durkheim (Williams, 2012). Protecting the people and their cultural biases, applying the punishment that straightens the social bonds as well as following laws and legislations despite of unwanted reaction in from of riots portray Mark Duggan’s killing as a lawful homicide (IPCC (a), 2015). However, if laws and legislations were not followed and actions were not aimed to protect people which led to a break in social bonds the reasonable

The second limitation of the state based justice is system is that victims are ignored and excluded from the formal criminal justice process (Daigle, 2012, p. 2). Under the state system the power is taken away from victims and placed into the hands of the state to ensure control over the criminal proceedings (Elliott, 2011, p. 65). Gromet and Darley (2006) argue that crime victims experience marginalization and frustration due to their exclusion in criminal proceedings (p. 396). They lack voice and an ability to

When it comes to describing domestic violence all that comes to mind is a woman or man being physically abused or being mistreated and humiliated by another person. You may think that since domestic violence is a serious concern the criminal justice system has taken actions to stop or prevent it. In reality the system is failing these women and some are getting seriously hurt or even killed. Domestic violence was not that popular before the Tracy Thurman case. Ever since the case was shown to the public domestic violence awareness increased. It captured the attention of the public through the media.

Charles Tilly’s article “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime” creates an analogy between the creation of European states and acting out an organized crime. Earlier in our course, we learned about Max Weber, who defined a state as “a human community that successfully claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory.” Tilly argues that the word “protection” in relation to physical force has positive and negative connotations, leading to illegitimate use of power during the period time that Tilly is discussing. Tilly’s analysis eventually tells the reader that war is always a major part of state politics; specifically that war making and state making are interdependent.

Society has a need for quality and equal justice along with protection for everyone and the process of how to effectively implement such a thing has been an issue for many years. Focusing on the problems of society incorporates methods of trying to fix it from political measures to law enforcement measures. The combined effort of the two brings out the issue of what method should be used to dominate the problems. Looking at

During the Great Depression rapid social change led to social disorganization that led to personal disorganization, which in turn lead to deviant and criminal behavior (Crutchfield, R. D. 2008). Social control was broken because of class differences, economic problems, cultural and ethnic issues. Crime rates can be reduced by states from necessary laws and solutions to social problems. Due to crimes many people have been killed, some have been harmed by other people. The states and the laws they are governed by are there to protect individuals from harm by other individuals. To the extent that states go to try and combat crime can, at times, be seen as going a bit too far in possessing the power that needs to be shown and enacted on when a person does commit a crime (Örmeci, Ozan 2011). There has to be order in our society, but to what extent, is a person’s dignity and integrity put at risk or harmed.

The “Get Tough on Crime” initiatives have experienced massive failure in the reduction of crimes in The United States, furthermore is the reason for thousands of individuals behind bars (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2015). Routinely, this has been advocating for zero tolerance in felony offenses handing out punishments whereby the criminals face the total rule of law. Some practices that the initiative advocates are for include three strike laws and the mandatory minimum sentencing. Although they were aimed at reducing crimes, they spur aggression on the public due to the heavy costs, additionally, the inability to deliver justice effectively.

With time violence may become such a commonplace that even seemingly sane people will see no problem murdering a store clerk, opening fire on someone that cut them off on the highway, or killing a disobedient child. "A society that chooses violent death as a solution to a social problem gives official sanction to a climate of violence." (Prejean, 57)

The research identifies the creation and maintenance of social order through threat of violence: “Hawthorne's image of the scaffold reminds us that good citizenship requires obedience” (Thomas 187). Paradoxically, the established social order abstains from violence under the threat of violence. As the upper echelon of society threatens to harm the lower class rebels, the lesser classes threaten rebellion against the upper class. Through this constant tension between the two class divisions, social order is maintained. Therefore, Thomas declares that, in order to maintain peace, both threats must remain equal and neither the lower or upper classes should violently oppose the other.

Since people outside of the state are not subject to the state’s laws, states must find other ways of preventing them from committing violence against the state or its inhabitants. The state achieves this by using the military, both as a threat and as a tool.

Fear of crime, especially random violence perpetrated by young Americans, is among the nation's greatest concerns. It has served as the motivation for countless numbers of people to change their lifestyles, take self-defense classes, install home security systems, and carry handguns for protection. Moreover, fear of crime has influenced politicians and