All Quiet on the Western Front/WWI Essay

1215 Words5 Pages
In regards to war, Gandhi once commented, “I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary, the evil it does is permanent.” In other words, violence masks its potential impairment by seeming innocuous at first; however, the true damage, often permanent, can be seen chronically. The idea reflected by Gandhi’s quote can be proven through an examination of World War I and Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front. Although soldiers and governments in both worlds initially saw honor and security of their countries as valid reasons for going to war, what ultimately came of that conflict were both immediate consequences, such as loss of innocence and development of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (often referred to as PTSD) among young soldiers, as well as permanent, long-term consequences, like the hatred the war had spurred in Germans which ultimately ensued to Hitler’s rise to power. Soldiers and their countries believe there were important reasons to fight in World War I because they aspired glorification and feared oppression from other countries, which lead to formation of alliances. In All Quiet on the Western Front, Paul, the narrator of the novel, and his classmates willingly volunteer in the war war because Kantorek, an authoritarian schoolmaster, established false beliefs in their minds. Kantorek patronizes the war and in a way, he views the war as an opportunity to immortalize himself in history. He strives to become a
Open Document