Allowing Modified Cars on Road in the European Union

The American automotive industry has been under a lot of pressure over recent years due to increased concern for the environment and increased global competition. An environmental scan on the American automotive industry shows that the global competition is a great cause for concern, new technology is providing an edge, emissions and laws regulating them are as tight as ever, and consumer opinion is reflecting concern for this.

At this time whole automobile industry have been trying to produce lighter vehicles, even if it leads to a little decrease in fuel consumption. On the other hand, while accounting ameliorates the product, the durability of the product has to be preserved. In order to measure these values, some tests have been made which are crash tests. Crash tests have been using to measure the crashworthiness of the car. Crash tests have a various operation at hand, for example; frontal impact test, side crash test, rear impact test, offset frontal impact test etc. All of the tests have tremendous regulations which have been arranged by public authority. Also the regulations divided into subtests for example, low velocity and high velocity impact test. Meanwhile, high velocity crash

The Vehicle Safety Compliance Act of 1988, a law that prohibits the import of a daily driver vehicle that is less than 25 years old. Has become an ongoing issue in today’s driving society. Specifically, the law states an imported car less than the manufacturing date of 25 years need to pass certain safety emissions and tests to be brought to U.S.A. “The vehicle must be capable of being brought into compliance with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.” (102 STAT. 2819). From 1988 to, the present consumers are arguing that this pointless law is taking away their freedom to buy and import vehicles at their own discretion. This could lead the consumers into black market schemes making it a very risky approach towards imported vehicles sales and would hurt the economy in the same process. The Vehicle Safety Compliance Act of 1988 should be removed because of the freedom it strips away from the automotive consumer.

Still, maintaining the functional mechanical operation is just as important. These automobiles must complete a 20 mile journey before judging begins. The road test is daunting for these older automobiles. Judges often apply leniency for safety items such as tires and brakes. However, when upgrading these items owners use reproduction parts close to the original equipment.

Legislation on automobile safety encompasses the certain minimum requirements to ensure safety. First, congress has made it the law for car manufacturers to meet the minimum requirements regarding safety standards for the overall design of the car. For example, this could include the engine design, seat belts, air bags, mirrors, and more. Additionally, safety is furthermore promoted on the highways

For us Americans the car is not just a helpful machine that helps us get around. The “sacred” American car is one of the most important status symbols of The American society. The newer and more expensive somebody car is a, the more well-off it’s driver is presumed, in reality that is not really the case.  Many Americans in todays

edited by auto enthusiasts. To them, the choice of a car is as important as the choice of a

Similarly government regulations in the United States and Europe are tightening up, consequently requiring cars to be cleaner and more fuel efficient. As a result, the collaboration with BMW is paramount to getting the most fuel efficient vehicles to the market in a timely manner so that GM can harvest a substantial profit. (3) In addition General Motors is working on the next generation of fuel efficient and gasoline free vehicles to help reduce the impact of the vehicle on the environment, while preserving personal mobility, which further indicates its commitment to innovation. (6)

The regulatory tests were certainly not anticipated to be an analyst of real world vehicle’s performance. Relatively, they are a very useful device for stand up and unfolding technologies, vehicles or industry, and have recognized very operative at driving hi-tech change. For example, tests which discovered the

One of the hardest-fought controversies in the European Union today surrounds the standardization of requirements for consumer goods. Regarding this issue as it pertains to cars, this debate has proven to be particularly heated. Different nations have different safety standards, driving habits, and manufacturing requirements. These prerequisites must be taken into account when creating a standardized format for EU regulations. Now, "the European Commission is drawing up plans for a 'roadworthiness test' which would mean that all components had to conform to those which were on the car when it was first registered" (Millward). The purpose of the test is to ensure that modifications do not result in compromises to safety or environmental sustainability. Ultimately, the phrasing of the law is written so restrictive and cumbersome it is more detrimental than helpful to consumers.

This topic of discussion has frustrated many car enthusiasts over the years as the market

When a purchase is made, the consumer expects the good to be in proper working condition and justly so. Cars, being a potentially dangerous commodity if they fail, are expected to be fail proof once in the consumer’s possession. Over the decades however, there have been multiple product liability litigations carried out against leading car manufacturers like Ford, Volkswagen or GM for issues ranging from design flaws to unreliable emission reports. The agency of NHTSA is the one responsible for keeping society safe through legislation like the FAST Act, CLEANUP Act or the TREAD Act.

People tell [mechanics] to build a car in eighteen months that will sell for twenty-five thousand dollars” (Gladwell, 2015: 1). Gladwell discusses how the work of most car manufacturers is affected by deadlines and different outside pressures, which could potentially cause errors and malfunctions in their product. These problems could potentially be avoided if proper precautions are taken, but instead car manufacturers release the cars and often have to recall them after accidents occur. Sunstein made a point that when it comes to many different problems “prevention does indeed seem best– cheaper and most efficient,” and even though it is not always possible and profitable, prevention should be at least considered (Sunstein, 202: 100). Major problems, such as pollution, cannot easily be prevented. People would be forced to change their lifestyles or to find alternative fueling methods, which could possibly be costlier than the problem itself. However, car malfunctions can be prevented if mechanics took longer to inspect cars before releasing them to the

The automotive industry is constantly changing in the ways one would least expect it to. Incremental steps have been taken by the automotive industry over the past decade through the constant revisions and refreshing of past automotive product line. Although the most drastic change easily distinguishable between past vehicle generations is cosmetic, internal improvements such as engine modification and powertrain upgrades have made fruitful efforts to increase efficiency and Eco friendliness; it’s unfortunate that many of these changes have been largely been unnoticed by the common population. Change is good, but only to a certain extent. Often times, it is the smaller changes that have the longer lasting effects. In addition, people are more prone to dislike rapid change and therefore smaller changes easier to accept. As Senior executive F. John Ref, article writer of Managing People’s Fear, explains the controversy of change, “Change is natural and good, but people's reaction to change is unpredictable and irrational. It can be managed if done right.” (Reh) John infers that too much change can have adverse effects. People are resistant to change and are comfortable with what they are used to. People have been used to driving gasoline cars for centuries and the sudden shift for alternative fuels and engines has proven to be a difficult task. Not only do we currently lack the technology and resources to completely free

But the government is perhaps less keen for people to know that this apparently shocking move may not actually achieve anything at all. For it will only take effect in 2040, by which time market forces Are likely to have largely complete the transition from fossil fuels to electricity-powered vehicles