America Should Abolish The Death Penalty

The last reason why the death penalty should be illegal is that there are innocent people on death row. If an innocent person is wrongly executed people cannot fix that mistake. “Since the reinstatement of the death penalty, at least 139 men and women have been released nationally” (“The National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty” n.p). For some criminals on death row it is too late for them a lot of innocent people have been executed. For 7 death row inmates executed, 1 inmate has been found to be

In America, the death penalty is a highly debated topic. In the debate “should the death penalty be abolished,” Diann Rust-Tierney and Joshua Marquis argue this issue. Although the death penalty system is prone to error and discrimination, space the death penalty should not be abolished because win the executions started to raise the murder rate began to drop in America and that scientists have proven that the death penalty is a definite deterrent to murder.

Some may say the death penalty is one of the most ethical and controversial issues of all time. The issue brings forth anger among many individuals among todays society. This anger has developed over time throughout the history of the death penalty. Over time, the policy has been developed, started and evolved over time. Different states and countries choose to address the penalty differently resulting in more of a controversy. I personally believe that this policy is severely wrong and needs immediate attention. The numbers of people who live on death row are shocking. These high numbers create issues for citizens of the country, and if they were simply put straight to death there would not be so many issues for citizens. It is for the better interest of the states that the death penalty be utilized in all states. Through changing this policy, the crime rate will be lowered, the guilty receive what they deserve, taxpayers money is not spent on keeping the guilty in prison, and prisons are not overcrowded.

My biggest issue with the death penalty is the amount of people that end up being innocent. According to the Death Penalty Information Center "153 people have been exonerated from death row". The most recent one was April of 2017 which is crazy this continues to happen until present day no matter how good our technology maybe. Mr. Teleguz was accused of murder he was later found innocent: Weiner states that ' 'the prosecutor made explicit reference to this evidence in arguing that Mr. Teleguz was so dangerous that he needed to be put to death". Americans cannot always trust their own judgment the prosecutor was so quick to assume when he was completely wrong. Imagine if they were unable to

The death penalty has been around legally in the United States since the early 1970s. It has been used to execute those who have committed terrible crimes like murder or terrorism. Many people feel that this is a good way of bringing the families of the victims closure and making our streets safer to live on. While this may be true, it is hard to ignore the fact that many innocent people have been killed because of wrongful convictions. Through DNA testing and other evidence, the courts are finding people who have been convicted for a crime are actually innocent. The death penalty has killed over thousands of people who have committed terrible heinous crimes. It has gotten these people out of our streets and into prisons or even out of this world for good. Many people in America find this to be very pleasing and beneficial to the states and country because it is one less criminal we will have to worry about. Even though the death penalty takes many dangerous people out of our streets, it should be abolished because of the number of innocent people that have been on Death Row or are still on it.

Since the state has no power to give life, it should not exercise its power to take a life either. After all, the judicial system is not a fool-proof system. The risk of putting an innocent human being to death by capital punishment, cannot be ruled out. The only purpose it serves is retribution or revenge. Therefore, the death penalty must be abolished. The death penalty is prone to errors that may have led to the execution of wrongfully convicted people. There have been 330 post-conviction DNA exonerations here in the U.S (Innocence Project).

The death penalty is a punishment of execution for a criminal that has convicted a serious crime. Crime rates go up throughout the years, but still the death penalty is not a way to find a solution to the world’s problems. Due that the death penalty costs more than sending a criminal to prison for 40 years, does not stop any form of crime, but it just increases it, and it is not a satisfying form of punishment. Therefore, the death penalty should be removed!

Capital punishment which furthermore identifies as the death penalty, execution has been a hot topic in the public eye for a while. The question on lots of minds is whether it is acceptable for the state to terminate one’s life for the crime they have committed. A significant issue that we will address is that the justice system over time formulates mistakes. Whether it’s processing the evidence improperly or missing an enormous piece of the puzzle, making mistakes can happen. If the justice system executed an innocent there is no way for it to redeem itself. There is no way for a person to be brought back to life. As I began to research further into this issue, I became aware that plenty of people agree with the idea of capital punishment being endorsed; however, I believe asking this question will be the key to finally finding closure to this issue.

Executing people for what they have done; homicide, kidnapping, illegal injection and so, has been a “vast” object at issue for years, since it is seen as a cruel, vicious way of punishment. Nevertheless, among numerous countries, states and ultimately, the public, death warrant has been attempted continuously while insisting it is brutal, but mostly; found that it can literally prevent people from committing a crime. Moreover, harshness is considered as the only way of hampering humanity from killing each other, but it actually is not. In spite of capital punishment, life parole is a nice way of incarcerate people, and there is a possibility of discharge. Discharge can be exceptional as people have the grasp to profit from

the years 1973 until 2009, over 135 inmates were released from death row as new evidence surfaced and proved their innocence (Schmalleger 360). This is just one of the many alarming facts that assist in the argument that the death penalty should be completely abolished. As the public opinion of capital punishment changes, there has been a drastic shift in the way states are carrying out death penalty sentences. Since 2007, seven states have abolished the death penalty as a possible punishment for crime (Schmalleger 369). Even though many states still have the ability to sentence an offender to death, only ten states have practiced an execution since 2007 (Dieter 815). While many argue the death penalty is necessary to protect society and can serve as retribution to the victim 's family, capital punishment should be abolished because it violates religious beliefs, and is a cruel and costly alternative to life without the possibility of parole, and it gives the criminal a way out by not allowing the criminal to take responsibility for crimes they committed.

There has always been controversy surrounding the death penalty. Death penalty is an age-old punishment where a crime is punished by various methods of death. There were death penalty laws that existed from the times of ancient Babylonian period and the mention of this practice has been recorded in many books and inscriptions from long ago. This practice continues even today in some countries like the US, despite the advancements that we have made as a society. Since the death penalty wastes people’s tax money, is inhumane, and is largely unnecessary it should be abolished in every state across the United States.

It’s been said that looks could be deceiving. For Ronald Cotton, this was definitely the case when he was accused of a crime that he did not commit but really it was Bobby Poole who was an exact image of him; he had to spend 11 years of his life in prison before getting his life back. (Weinberg 358-359). Flaws such as this in our justice system are a reason why abolishing the death penalty is still a controversial debate. The legal system is there to defend the cries of the innocent, yet it cannot seem to determine who the innocents are. Until the voice of its people can be defended, the death penalty should be abolished. It is administering its punishments hoping they have the right perpetrator. It’s basically a guessing game and that should not be the case when it comes to who will end up getting deprived of their life. The death penalty is a racially biased system that is sometimes unfairly administered to innocent people not guilty of a crime and also leaving the family of defendants with a burden of a shameful and isolating image.

We often say, “We are only human, we make mistakes,” as a common phrase. We, as humans, are known to make mistakes. However, in the case of the death penalty, making an error can prove to be lethal. The death penalty imposes an irreversible deed on a human being. Once a person’s life is taken away, there is no way to give it back. The main reason people have different views is because of cultural, political, social, and ethical reasons. Murder is wrong. Since childhood, we have been taught this truth. It has been implanted in our brains that taking the life of another is wrong. Is that not the definition of murder? It is inhumane for us to tolerate the killing of another person. Violence cannot be the solution to crime. The death penalty should be abolished on the grounds that it does not prove to be an effective deterrent, it carries the risk of taking the life of an innocent soul, and there are flaws in the judicial system that lead to trials being unfair.

The justice system has been known to be unfair, biased, and inaccurate when it comes to the administration of the death penalty. The idea of the death penalty has been around since biblical times, and it still runs off of the same theory an eye for an eye. A person commits a horrible crime and their put to death this is how it has always been whether it’s stoning them to death or taking a more humane approach like lethal injection a human being is killed either way. Even in our day and age, the system is imperfect, and

Since the year 1973, there have been nearly 1600 people put on death row. Of those 1600, 151 of the people were exonerated, or proven not guilty. These people were very fortunate and were able to keep their lives, but not everyone is that lucky. At least 8 people have been suggested to be innocent after an execution; however nobody has been proven innocent. After an execution, there is no way to overturn a verdict. It is possible for there to be flaws such as false testimonies, inaccurate forensics, and even bias from the jury that could cost an innocent person his life. Therefore, the death penalty should be repealed because it is impossible to be one hundred percent certain every time that an individual is guilty of the crime he is being charged with.