By January, 2014, even former U.S. Secretary of Education Arnie Duncan had noticed the “dysfunction” (Elliott, 2014) among Indiana’s education and political leaders. A 2015 Senate Bill was even authored that would have ended Indiana’s practice of electing the state education chief so one could be appointed by the governor (SB 24). A look at the headlines in the Indianapolis Star over the past couple of years sums up nicely the relationship among Indian’s educational and political leaders:
November 5, 2014: 10 epic clashes between Glenda Ritz, Indiana State Board of Education
December 3, 2014: Glenda Ritz loses another State Board of Education battle
January 14, 2015: Senate education bills would strip power from Glenda Ritz
February 18, 2015: Senate OKs change in selection of Education Board chair; Glenda Ritz could be left out
April 30, 2015: Glenda Ritz considers running for governor after legislative attacks
May 7, 2015: Pence signs bill stripping Ritz of education authority
August 30, 2015: GOP struggling to find challenger for Glenda Ritz
(Nice long lull in the headlines…)
March 13, 2016: With election looming, Indiana lawmakers played it safe in 2016 session After two years of public bickering over such topics as rules of order, school A-F grades, the Center for Education and Career Innovation, NCLB waivers, and state takeovers of failing schools, Governor Pence signed SB 1 in 2015 that will strip leadership of the State Board of Education from the elected State
The twentieth century only saw an increase in the industrialization and urbanization that began in the nineteenth century. The new social, political and economic problems that began to emerge due to all of the changes developing in America during these times led to a need for reform. Reform was needed throughout society whether it was in regards to immigrants, civil rights, regulating trusts, or woman’s rights to name a few. These problems extended equally into the problems that educational progressives sought out to reform. John Dewey is commonly used as the embodiment of progressive era reformation ideas but there were others as well, such as Grace C. Strachan, George Counts, and Booker T. Washington.
Even though the Declaration of Independence does not mention education, our founding fathers did value education. Illustrated by the ordinances they passed “in 1785 and 1787 that granted federal lands to states to create and support public school- an institution that the nation’s founders viewed as essential to democracy and national unification.” (Jennings, p3) In 1959, the admission of Alaska and Hawaii into the Union reconfirmed the Federal government’s support of education. Three distinct elements that impact education are; laws that have been passed, the removal of the church from public schools, and the role of federal government that has evolved and changed over the years. These three factors have transformed education over the
Education is the key to our future and that is why it is such an important subject in the United States. Education relates to federalism by interacting with the national government, state governments, and local governments. Each level of government is responsible for improving education within their limits of power.
Here in America every single child is sent to school starting at the age of five years old for kindergarten, and sometimes as early as two years old for pre-school and continue on to get an education late into their twenties, some even going on to take classes the rest of their lives. Education in America is something that is readily available and even is required by law, but taken for granted by many children. On flip side third world countries often do not have schools or public education mandated by government, and most times it is not even available when most children yearn for it. Education is taken for granted in America, and in third world countries where education is almost completely absent something can be learned from their
Indirectly, or directly, one can argue, public schools are controlled by the federal and state governments. Several issues have emerged, because of the conflict between federal and state requirements for education. “Under the Tenth Amendment, any authority not given specifically to the federal government is reserved to the states. Thus, the federal government has no authority to regulate education directly; that belongs to the states” (Underwood, n. d., p. 2). To get around this, the federal government controls the schools through funds for complying with certain initiatives, procedures, and policies (Underwood, n. d.). Ironically, both the state and federal levels of government hold the district liable for implementing different agendas and legal obligations. The federal government, however, can ensure that no citizen is denied their rights or privileges, even in a private institution, because of the Bill of Rights and other amendments. Failure to comply by these amendments or statutes can lead to the loss of federal funding and legal reproductions for schools.
On Christmas Eve in 2010, my grandmother received a gift from a hospice nurse who was assisting with my grandfather’s deteriorating health. Initially both surprised and embarrassed by the gesture, her emotions quickly changed once she removed the wrapping. A single package of Ramen Noodles was revealed. Embarrassment changed to confusion as she attempted to wrap her mind around what she had received. The hospice worker drove a 1997 Plymouth Voyager that she regularly complained about not being able to run properly for more than a week. She wore old worn out clothing and my grandmother claims she had never seen the woman wear jewelry before. It was evident that she was not wealthy. Although she could not afford a gift, the nurse in her
The American public educational system is filled with an assortment of problems. Most students are graduating with less knowledge and capability than similar students in other industrialized countries. Classroom disruptions are surprisingly common, and in some classrooms, nearly continuous. The public education system is having difficulty adjusting to the no child left behind act. The No Child Left Behind(NCLB) is a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of American’s schools.
Issues: (1) Does Kentucky’s General Assembly provide a proper and adequate education for all children of the commonwealth? (2) Does the General Assembly ensure Kentucky’s school system adheres to the constitutional mandates of Section 183? (3) Do the Minimum Foundation and Power Equalization Programs equally distribute financial resources to all districts throughout the state? (4) Does Kentucky’s school systems meet Section 183’s standard or efficiency?
I hope this letter reaches you in good spirts. As stated in my previous letter that I anticipated you had time to read I expressed many concerns about Betsy DeVos. As you may know Betsy DeVos was elected as the Education Secretary. This matter is very concerning to not only students but the Education Department as a whole. I am also extremely troubled by the direction of which the county may be headed towards. I can only expect the best for students in this county being that DeVos is an advocate for charter and private schooling. My goal is for this letter to influence you take the time and look into the education and the direction of the county.
In the circumstance of the bill passing, the Federal Executive branch will be left will the challenge of enforcing the stricter rules upon the Republican states while trying to maintain their employment at Odyssey, which can be done using rewards and threats. Passing Hb-1356 will prove to be problematic for the Federal Government as it will leave them with issues to solve concerning the Republicans opposed to the bill. Once again referencing the words of Representative Hiatt: “This bill strips away the heart of what makes us teachers….our individual personalities will be worthless….There is no set guideline that works beyond reproach. What makes us different than Verrado or Buckeye Union if this bill passes? This bill sums up the ethical
It has been stated that Texas has been encountering many issues leaving questions about their future in education. A high degree of students are not completing high school therefore, leaving Texas with an unskilled workforce for the upcoming years. Texas is being left with a vast group of individuals that lack the necessary education and skills needed to earn a living, and subsequently requiring assistance from the government later on. Now, it is not to say that all the fault is due to the lack of student cooperation but also the school board, and teachers themselves.
“I have not heard anything to make me believe the current administration is even interested in the Indian community other than to reduce/eliminate funding for Indian programs,” stated Quinton Roman Nose, executive director of the Tribal Education Departments National Assembly (Capriccioso, 2017). Ryan Zinke supports federal funding for school choice initiatives and recognizes the unmet challenges on the part of the Bureau of Indian Education (Mueller, 2017). As much as Zinke voices his support, wanting funding to change and actually getting it to happen are often not indicative of real
Since 1983 public education has been an issue in America. The system has been constantly changing every year with reforms. This constant change has been driven by the American people’s perception that education has declined and something should be done about it. First there was an increased emphasis on basic skills, making school years longer and more graduation requirements. Second, many began focusing on increasing teachers professionalism. Third, they began restructuring many things such as how the schools were organized and how the school day was structured etc. Now today the most of the American people believe that not enough money is given to public schooling. They associate academic improvement with the money the school is funded.
While many supported President Obama’s semblance of education reform in Race to the Top, various factions were vehemently against RTT and its implementation. Republicans primarily stand against federal involvement in state and local schools. The party opposed RTT advanced Common Core State Standards, which promote a “one size fits all approach to education” (Spring, 2015, 63). Along with political factions, those majorly impacted by RTT objected to its premise. The main teachers unions in the U.S., the National Education Association as well as the American Federation of Teachers, highlighted several points of disagreement in RTT which would lead to challenges in implementation. At the time, the NEA said it cannot support RTT’s endorsement of using test scores for evaluating teachers, increasing the number of charter schools, and bolstering what the union calls “fast-track” alternative routes to teacher licensure (Sawchuk 2009). Additionally, the AFT expressed concerns about RTT and how much the program helps students, whether it is fair to teachers, whether it is transparent to the public, and whether it requires shared responsibility (Weingarten 2009). Along with teachers unions, members of academia spearheaded critiques of RTT. Joe Onosko’s eight point manifesto adequately details the concerns of educators at the time of implementation. The flaws of the plan (RTT) are as follows:
Depending on subject and teacher 's methods of education decide which method students will receive. However, the student does not have a choice to choose education which they will get. While students receive an education in a variety of ways, they find the most effective method of education for themselves. Which lead numerous opinions and debate with the different methods of education. Although there are advantages and disadvantages of each method, people conclude the liberal education is the most efficient way to give student clear understanding of the contents. Liberal education is an approach to methods of education that gives students chance to prepare and deal with complex problems and solve challenging questions. It can make students to develop the knowledge deeply, on various topics such as politics, culture, and society.