America 's Freedom Of Speech

People in our society do not really have a say in what goes on in our community. “Unlike our colleagues, they had little trouble distinguishing corporations from human beings, and when they constitutionalized the right to free speech in the First Amendment, it was the free speech of individual Americans that they had in mind (Stevens, 115-116).” Society is manipulated into thinking the way government officials want voters to think. The society being those who work in government jobs are limited in what can be discussed amongst the world. This limit takes away workers and the community freedom of speech.

Simply put, free speech and its integral role in free society is fading, or rather: free society itself is fading. In our homes, we sit in our leather recliners with a can of forget and a bowl of regret, our mouths wide open, our eyes peeled watching our American gods of knowledge and opinion as they place their words into our mouths, into our hearts, and into our brains. And by our gods, we learn of our true identity - our box that our features and characteristics place us in, what we should really be thinking about, and which side of the political "fiesta" that we should be falling for. Likewise, the young adults in American Colleges are being taught standards of socio-ethical appeasement and continuing these “skills” from college into their daily lives: the fabric of American Society, which is a primary factor in the end of the First Amendment right of the American public. The American population is not only controlled (socio-politically) by the desires and politicization in the industries of advertisement and entertainment but also the “corrupted” situation of the American college, which are both extending the dissolution of free speech in the United States.

I believe free speech in America is slowing depleting even though the first amendment of

Freedom of speech is the most paramount aspect of establishing a functioning government. The right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint, or freedom of speech, has its origins dating back to the creation of the United States. Although the Articles of Confederation, the first form of government America instituted, did not acknowledge free speech, the new form of government that came subsequent, the Constitution, stressed the importance of freedom of expression. Consequently, a prosperous, and working society was forged out of the desires of the founding fathers to add free speech in America. Nonetheless, similar to most freedoms, there are limitations to the right of free speech. Because the United States grants freedom of

Freedom of speech is an essential right and freedom guaranteed to the citizens of the United States by the first amendment of the United States Constitution. The right to exercise this freedom, and to what extent, is a debate that has generated considerable discussion between governments, the press, and many international organizations such as WikiLeaks worldwide. In this current technological age of digital information and global social media, there is a growing need to maintain access to sensitive data and to control the release of classified information in relation to National Security, political and cultural affairs between the United States, NATO and NATO allies, and the protection of United States military personnel overseas.

As citizens of the United States, we have the right to freedom of speech, which is one of the most valuable rights a person has in the United States. This right allows people to speak their minds against unjust policies, and live in the country with an open mind without the fear of the government or being prosecuted. These rights have been exercised throughout history, and have made a positive impact in our country. However not every country is allowed to have free speech, which makes this a luxury for our citizens. Recently the questioning of whether there should be limits to the freedom of speech has risen, and many want restrictions against biased and racist remarks. I believe we should have the freedom of speech because it allows us to express our opinions on certain topics that we may not agree on.

All of the famous people and presidents give speeches to anyone on their state and give them freedom. All of lot of people wants to be freedom and they want someone give them a speech about them and themselves. When everyone wants to know what’s the freedom of speech you will ask anyone that talks about history in the past. The freedom of speech is the only way to let the people to know about history what is freedom to the past and try harder. Just when people give you the speech doesn’t means freedom, it means not to give up with your dreams. There is a lot of people that gives the freedom of speeches include presidents and your friends and family that believes of freedom. There is some people that go to jail and the`re innocent, they want

Australia is one of the countries with the free speech concept implicated in its constitution as because there is no such case where constitutional protection is provisioned . In the United States we can see a wider constitutional protection regarding the freedom of speech whilst in Australia it is quite different. The libel actions have got a significant role in the matters of public affairs as being the regular arsenal of political combat in Australia . As indicated by the laws in Australia the power of parliament has also got limitation regarding the free speech in some specified places which has been found out by the research made . The offensive behaviour in public is also prohibited according to the Summary Offensive Act Section 6 .The

The right to freedom speech is one of the many great reasons America is one of if not the best country on this planet. America for ages has been a home for all and place where anyone can be themselves. However, what happens when these rights are tampered with and questioned? What happens when freedom of speech is no longer a guaranteed right? The supreme court case Island Trees School District v Pico dealt with a scenario where this right was essentially dissected. The Island Trees School District board made the claim that specific books amidst the school library were promoting anti american, anti-christian, anti-semitic, and just plain filthy ideological constructs. Dealing with a case such as this can be a rather tough decision. Each

There are people in the United States that today don't understand what freedom speech actually means and what limitations it has. They believe that Freedom of Speech is saying whatever you want, whenever you want. But if they took the time to actually read the First Amendment they would realize that there is a time and a place where Freedom of Speech should and should not be used.

“What you are doing takes a lot of courage… There are already plenty of people fighting fire with fire, and it’s just not helping anyone or anything. So I’m just going to keep listening, with an open mind”; said Nate Boyer in a letter to Colin Kaepernick. In 2016 when Colin Kaepernick sat during the National Anthem to protest police brutality towards African Americans. In response some people were angry but Nate Boyer, a former Green Beret, wrote him a letter. In the letter he states that his initial reaction was one of anger but after looking at Kaepernick’s point of view he respects his opinion and supports his first amendment right. Kaepernick then invites Nate Boyer to join him on the sidelines for a game. Before the game the two come

What is free speech? Freedom of speech is the right to be allowed to say controversial things without punishment. The first amendment is the right of freedom of speech to all Americans. In addition, Americans have rights and laws they abide by, from gun laws to free speech. Free speech has a long history in America, from its beginnings in 1791, to artist in their crafts and to civilian’s rights to speak up and make a difference. Free speech differs from hate speech in a few ways, one being that free speech can be walked away from, hate speech is something forced upon a person. Although free speech is controversial, America protects it to give its citizens the freedom they deserve.

The ability to express oneself is a right that can easily be taken for granted. The right to free speech has become essential to modern society. As we have grown accustomed to this freedom, it has been accepted that all people have the right to free speech, which can take many forms, such as beliefs, thoughts, and actions. However, there are still areas in the world in which citizens are not afforded the same ability that we possess. They are not able to argue what they believe in, knowing they will be silenced for speaking their mind. As a result, it is necessary to argue for free speech on behalf of those without a voice. In this essay, I will argue that there should be a right to free speech given to all humans.

The protesting started after the police brutalities and was moving with the black lives movement. The protest is trying to show that Kaepernick isn’t going to do something for a flag that oppresses black people or people of color. Standing during the national anthem at school or at the ball park, I never did it. I have almost felt as those words “And the land of the free and the home of the brave” don’t support the society that were living in today. I feel as though not standing for the American flag or the national anthem shouldn’t be the reason someone is jobless, I honestly believe everyone has their first amendment and that’s freedom of speech and this is what Colin Kaepernick of the San Francisco 49er’s protested on.

Throughout history, humans have casually turned words into predators, while making prey out of those it applies to. Our casual blindness of others disparities often allow certain discriminatory words to prevail and be empowered. Derogatory terms such as retard, gay, fag, etc have played a significant role in the dehumanization and victimization of marginalized people. On the topic of the R word, in the Washington Post published article “A Movie, a Word, and My Family’s Battle, Patricia E. Bauer argues that the word should be banned as a whole because of the hurtful and discriminatory undertones it promotes. In contrast, in the Washington Post published essay, “The case against banning the word retard,” Christopher M. Fairman claims that banning the R word would, in fact, be stripping Americans of their first amendment right. Freedom of speech is debatably the greatest American value, thus prohibiting the word would restrain us of what America stands for. Even though most of what Bauer writes about is genuinely true, I do not agree with the R word being utterly banned due to freedom of speech, potential lack of discussion amongst the word, and erasing the word's actual meaning. Instead, it should be reclaimed by those affected by it in order to put the power in the rightful hands.