American Amnesia Research Paper

The hypothesis formulated in this paper is that news media's ability to control the agenda and impact our world views is not as important as it seems.

I believe that it is a good idea to get rid of upsetting or traumatic memories by using medication or other types of therapy In some occasions. There are so many people that come back from war with PTSD and because of it aren't able to function properly and end up becoming homeless. I believe this would be beneficial for them so that they can hopefully lead normal lives. This treatment could also be beneficial for first responders like the article says. A downside could be becoming addicted to the medication because they don't want to feel anything due to being depressed.There are also unknown side affects that all medications have. What if it causes anterograde amnesia? Also, if you do decide to go to therapy you run the risk of a stranger

Repressed memories are memories that have been unconsciously hidden due to the memory being associated with a high level of stress or trauma. Repressed memories may later come out, however it may not be for years. Many repressed memories don’t come out for years and happen quite often with childhood sexual abuse cases. People believe that repressed memories may still effect people subconsciously.

Do you think an experience can be so traumatizing that the brain pushes it into an inaccessible corner of the unconscious to later recall it years later? This concept on the mind is expressed as repressed memories. These are types of memories that are blocked unconsciously due to the high levels of stress experienced during the event. This theory on memories are based on the idea that even though the memory is repressed it is still affecting the individual in their conscious aspects of life. Repressed memories are often associated with childhood sexual abuse. This relies on the idea that these memories of sexual abuse can be brought up either in therapy or by the victim themselves years after the abuse. The concept of repressed memories has been a huge controversy in psychology from the beginning of time. Many people believe that repressed memories in regards to childhood sexual abuse are possible while others believe they can’t be as accurate as some people believe.

False memories are something that many can be susceptible to. Whether they are induced by another using description, or make believe trauma created by the brain, false memories can cause complications. These recollections which can be instilled in the mind can create negative repercussions for those involved with the situation it pertains to. Implanting these false memories, dealing with them, and the stress caused by these memories can all have severely negative outcomes if misused.

Amnesia is when people forget things easily. They tend to forget information that is stored in their memory. If you are a little forgetful it doesn’t mean you have amnesia, but if you forget a lot of memories that you should have not forgot you have amnesia. Examples of amnesia are important milestones in your life, memorable events, key people in life, and important fact that we have been told or taught. Just like you see something happen and then someone asks you what happened and you can’t remember. Normal causes could be from brain damage or using sedative drugs. Alzheimer’s disease is one of the big diseases you could get from amnesia. People find it hard to imagine the future if they have amnesia. (Researchers form Washington University in St. Louis, Christina Nordqvist. 2009) used advanced brain imaging techniques to show the remembering the past and envisioning the future may go hand-in-hand, with each process sparking strikingly similar patterns of activity within precisely the same broad network of brain regions. Remembering events and experiences is a very complex brain process. Although amnesia is a popular theme for movies and books, it is a very rare condition (Christina Nordqvist, 2009).

The aim of this chapter is to explore the representation of the Austrians in young people’s fiction of the 1980S. Avgi Papakou-Lagou’s novel Μην κλαις μικρούλα μου [Don’t cry, my little girl, 1988] is set in the 1940s and centers on the endeavours of a loving husband and father to reunite with his family. Having just come back from the Albanian Front, Kostas is devastated to discover that both his daughter and wife have gone missing. After strenuous efforts he manages to track down his wife only to find out that she suffers from amnesia and has no memories of their previous life together. On top of that Kostas discovers that his wife Maria is now romantically involved with a former German soldier, Erik, who is also struggling with amnesia.

Understanding the background and history of the Agenda Setting Theory is imperative to this analysis. Dr. Max McComb and Dr. Donald Shaw developed the Agenda Setting Theory in a study conducted during the 1968 presidential election (McCombs & Shaw, 1972, p. 178). This study describes how if an audience is exposed to the same media, they will place importance on the same issues. This theory strictly presents information and sets the terms of public discourse. At the time, this was a trailblazing new idea.

Amnesia is a type of memory loss that one develops in certain situations. It does not mean, however, that one forgets their self-identity. It states that those who have amnesia only have the trouble of acquiring new memories or forming new memories. Some causes of amnesia are damage to the brain structures that form the limbic system, which is where your emotions and memories are controlled, those who have Alzheimer’s disease, seizures, strokes, tumors in the area of the brain that controls memory, and also alcohol abuse. There are two main different types of amnesia. The two types are retrograde and anterograde, and there are some significant case studies in which these individuals had one or both types of

Agenda-setting is one of the most important factors in shaping public opinion. Agenda-setting can be defined as the ability of the media to direct public attentions toward the issues they believe are important to the public. But whose choice is it that determines which issues are more important over others? The news media can set an agenda-setting by focus attention on selected issues on which the public will form opinions from (McCombs). The media can paint a memory in your head by repeatedly repeating the issues on different media sources as Internet, network televisions, newspapers, etc. Since these sources are the cheapest and easiest to access, the information can be view by vast number of audiences. As quoted in a 1922 classic called “Public Opinion” by Walter Lippmann,

The readings in this week is all about the agenda setting. The agenda setting model can guide the public opinion and mass communication about some social or political issues. Different with media effects model, the media effects more like to telling people how to think, however, the agenda setting model is successful in telling people what to think about. In a general way, agenda setting theory was constructed in the environment of traditional mass media, and the purpose is to study traditional mass media.

Agenda setting theory is the hypothesis done by Shaw and McCombs, stating that the mass media has the ability to transfer the importance of issues on their news agenda to the public agenda. This theory contrasted with the selective exposure hypothesis which held that people only attend to stories which confirm their world view. The theory had two attractive features, one it reaffirms the power of the press and second it maintains individual freedom. Also it is represented a back to the basics approach to mass communation research, with a focus on election campaigns.

In 1922, Walter Lippmann suggested the very first idea of agenda-setting in his book “Public Opinion”, and Bernard Cohen (1963) said “The media may not tell us what to think, but they are stunning successful in telling us what to think about”. Those concepts assumed that with the limited ability and innate curiosity of human beings, most people rely on media institutions to gain information outside family, neighborhood and workplace. Thus the media organizations have the priority to choose which information is quality enough to be the most important, which is not, and the information emphasized by the media could salience transfer to the public.

The phenomenon of media covers a vast amount of space in terms of its definition as well as whether it has a physical or contextual meaning. It is fundamental to understand the supremacy media upholds, however; vital to recognize the ways in which it shapes our lives. Elegantly put, media may not tell us what to think, but rather what to think about. What this means is that, we are not necessarily conditioned to believe what the media wants us to think, but instead the ideas of what is important are instilled to us. This now brings me to the point of media framing and agenda setting. I will investigate the relevance of framing and agenda setting in the media by explaining the approach the world’s media outlets take when reporting information. I will also be breaking down and criticizing examples of framing in news media. These concepts will be analyzed more in depth as I rationalize the relevance of media framing and agenda setting.

In this essay we are going to take a look at the mass media and its role in changing public opinion. This involves analyzing various changes that have occurred in media coverage over the years as well as certain strategies used by media outlets such as framing, media bias and public relations, advertising and affiliating, and “parroting” between media outlets.