American Orator Injustice

To keep things simple, people simply want to be heard, and they will do anything in order for their audience to listen. There are various ways in which the speaker would gain the right to be heard. Former Governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Blanco, uses various forms to obtain attention from her audience as she addresses the Louisiana Legislator on Hurricane Katrina where she not only discusses the effects of the hurricane but also acknowledges the people who have helped out so far.

For many years now, Americans have intended to resolve the conflict regarding to attempt to strike a balance between preserving individual rights and forming a strong lasting union. In reality, the balance between these two topics may always remain intact and finding a solution for both may be difficult to achieve. Though it may be crucial which of the two topics benefits the country more, authors, characters, and founders, have made solid statements that give their own opinion that demonstrate why both of these topics are fundamental to our everyday life as Americans.

On March 23, 1775, an important speech was given in the Virginia Convention by a man name Patrick Henry - known as "the orator of Liberty." Being one of the earliest opponents of British rule and supporting American democracy with his speeches, Henry made a name for himself. In his speeches he used many different concepts to persuade an audience one of which was rhetorical appeals. Mr. Henry used rhetorical appeals such as pathos (appeal to emotions), logos (use of logic), and ethos (creditability to others).

Oration is one of the most ancient art forms in the world and can be used to instigate wars, ally countries, and fight for one’s personal beliefs. “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” by Patrick Henry and “To the Massachusetts Convention” by Jonathan Smith are two of the strongest orations of the 18th century. While they are in many ways similar, they are also vastly different. Although they both begin with the exact same address of, “Mr. President,” they have many more differences, including contexts, purposes, and rhetorical strategies. They are also given by two men who share virtually nothing in common. Patrick Henry and Jonathan Smith both use rhetorical strategy to address the president of their time, George Washington; however, the two speeches that develop from those initial phrases convey completely different ideals and spur dissimilar outcomes.

"It is impossible under the deadly hatred which must spring up between the two great nations, if the present causes are permitted to operate unchecked, that we should continue under the same political system. The conflicting elements would burst the Union asunder, powerful as are

Slavery in North America began when Virginia needed workers in 1619, to aid in the production of crops as tobacco. Slavery was a big deal in North American colonies during the 17th and 18th centuries, and African-American slaves helped build the economic foundations of the new nation. The Creation of the cotton gin in 1793 solidified the central importance of slavery to the South’s economy. By the mid-19th century, America’s westward expansion, along with a growing abolition movement in the North, would provoke a great debate over slavery that would tear the nation apart in the bloody American Civil War.

Two hundred forty years ago, Patrick Henry gave an influential speech at the Virginia Convention with the purpose of convincing the colonists to secede from Britain. In an immense display of courage, Henry publicly antagonized Britain by imputing the hardships that the colonists faced from the “mother country.” His speech was so powerful and inspiring, that it was credited with creating the spark America needed to break ties with Great Britain and go to war. Henry spoke from the heart. Along with that, another reason why his speech was so successful is that he used a basic form of rhetoric with perfect execution.

Douglas’s tactics come into play when he starts to criticize Lincoln’s case, which is expected in this debate. When Lincoln says that the slavery question was the only thing that had ever disturbed the peace and harmony of the Union, Douglas brings to light that nullification, disunion and war had disturbed the peace of the country where Douglas says, Lincoln’s argument “falls to the ground”.

The author concludes that Christians are to live faithfully by the values of the bible. As members of society, we are expected to play a critical role in in our community rather than isolating ourselves from those opposed to Christian worldviews. There are ways for Christians to live out their faith, but still remain active parts in the community.

The key question the author is addressing is What is truly our role as christians in society and what outlook should we have when dealing with politics?. Do we put our loyalties into

The development of public opinion meant that “he who molds public sentiment, goes deeper than he enacts statutes or pronounces decisions.” Lincoln deployed multiple strategies to harness the public’s sentiments towards Union

We follow the example of Jesus Christ. He taught his disciples to be “no part of the world” and made it clear that they should not take sides in political issues.—John 17:

“…one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” And so finishes the Pledge of Allegiance for the United States of America. Whether or not a person would wish to identify our nation as a Christian one, there is certainly no doubt that the very oath that binds a person into serving it includes serving God. As it follows, many of our laws are centered around our understanding of the Bible, and the morality that can be gleaned from it. Even in our modern time, where the lines are becoming more and more blurred, eighty-three percent of Americans still identify themselves as Christian. A common national ideology is that our country has a favored nation status with God; thus it is our responsibility to ‘sow the

The fourth principle is one of the most important when exercising Christian liberty in the right way. Sinclair Ferguson explains it really well, “Only when we recognize that we do not deserve our ‘rights’ can we properly exercise them as privileges. Sensitivity to others in the church, especially weaker others, depends on this sense of our own unworthiness.” This means Christians should be Christ-like by putting others needs before theirs because they are unworthy of the rights of Christian liberty (Ferguson, “Four Principles”). These four principles help guide

Throughout the course of time there have been many world renowned orators, that have forever changed history. The power to speak and captivate an audience is a gift that not many possess. There are have been numerous leaders throughout the world that have achieved this gift and have put it to use. There have been both positive and negative outcomes of public speaking by famous leaders. Whether it was African-American civil rights leader, Martin Luther King Jr., changing the world and the views of people for the better with his “I Have A Dream” speech, or German dictator, Adolf Hitler, pushing his anti-semitic views through his Nazi speeches, people listened. People will always listen to these speeches and take away something different