730003850 1,478 WORDS APURBA CHAKRABORTY American political culture is altogether vast and diversified; however, it retains one singular feature – it is a contradiction. At the core, the majority ideally has subscribed to the values of democracy, equality, individualism, and liberty. Even so, history attests to the fact that bona fide enforcement of such values is not consistent. The nation has simultaneously promoted equality while it denied equality. It has exercised open-mindedness toward other cultures while it rejected aspects of multiculturalism. It has upheld an individual’s right to private property while it used property to evaluate one’s worth. Nonetheless, the nation has maintained the democratic principles …show more content…
Rogers Smith argued in his thesis that the marker of America’s democratic nature as defined by Tocqueville, then reinforced in the writings of Myrdal and Hartz, stemmed from the absence of a European class system coupled with the lack of a hereditary monarchy (Smith 1993, 549). When held in contrast, this crafted the ostensible image of a remarkably egalitarian nation. Moreover, the prevailing belief at the time was that equality was intrinsic to the white male, thereby establishing the underpinning of the practice of ascriptive hierarchy. As described by Smith, the appeal and endurance in such an inegalitarian tradition existed in aspects that affirmed “an identity that has inherent and transcendent worth, thanks to nature, history, and God” (550). That is to say, the dilemma throughout history with entirely equitable ideologies takes root in the discontent of these inherently privileged elite being placed on the same plane with those they deem culturally and biologically inferior. Justifications for ascriptive practices have manifested in actions that include discriminatory hiring practices, ill-intended immigration restrictions, disenfranchisement through voting rights, and a doctrine deeming facilities and services as “separate but equal” (560-61). Such ploys blatantly come into conflict with egalitarian aspects of the nation’s political culture by subjecting select individuals to a substandard caste in American society.
The period between Reconstruction and World War I was a time of tremendous social, economic, and cultural change in the United States. The end of the Civil War, the shrinking of the frontier, the rise of immigration, and the rapid growth of industry that characterized this time period brought many issues of race, class, and status to the forefront of politics. Many different opinions came to light about what it means to be an American and the dynamic between the American individual and American society. The differing answers to these questions created both divisions and unifications between different races, classes, and political parties. Through careful analysis of historical documents from the period, it is evident that society owes all individuals basic civil rights and the ability to make a living through harnessing their skills in the workplace. Conversely, the individual owes society work that benefits society as a whole and participation in government through suffrage.
Chapter one of The American Political Tradition by Richard Hofstadter is centered on the Founding Fathers. The very beginning of the chapter says that the Constitutional Convention was trying to create a government that would pay debts and avoid currency inflation. The Democratic ideas that the Founding Fathers were so against appealed mostly to less privileged classes, and not at all to the higher classes. This chapter says that the Founding Fathers thought that if no constitutional balance were achieved, one specific class or would take over others. Three advantages of a good constitutional government were listed in this chapter as well. One: keep order against majority rule. Two: a representative government. Three: aristocracy and democracy
Richard Hofstadter examines the political beliefs of the founding fathers in the first chapter of the American Political Tradition. Ideas thought about by most Americans to be the center of our organization, our founders viewed liberty, democracy, and property, as evil. The composition can be depicted to be vicious as well, because liberty, democracy, and property are linked to the United States Constitution.
In Treatise on the Intellectual Character and Civil and Political Condition of Colored People in the U. States, Easton examines the dominating, seemingly ubiquitous power of racial prejudice in the United States. In this, Easton portrays a direct association between the endurance of a republic and the habits and sentiments of its people, ultimately asserting that the success of a republican government is contingent upon the character of its citizenry. Therefore, contrary to the beliefs of the American colonists at the time, Easton argues that institutional configuration alone cannot protect the virtuous ideals of freedom and equality that are embedded in republicanism. Rather, a republic can only be as good as that of which motivates
Over the course of the first century and a quarter of the history of the United States of America, what it means to be an American has been defined by a number of different documents. The authors of those documents have come from varied backgrounds all searching to find their place in the growth and development of this country. At the beginning of the nation, those authors came from the English tradition of what government should look like and what those who were looking to change that government should do. When the country experienced some early growing pains, many of those same people came together again to try and develop a new system of laws for the country. As the nation grew up, it also grew apart and faced arguably the most
When people say that an American political culture is procedural, they are referring to the concept of procedural guarantees, which states that the government should insure fair rules and processes that will work smoothly in order to treat everyone equally with no promise of a negative or positive outcome. On the contrary, when people say that an American political culture has an individualistic nature, they are referring to the concept of individualism, which states that what is good for society is based upon what is good for individuals. These two concepts can correlate and relate to the three core American values of democracy, equality, and freedom. Americans refer to democracy as representative democracy, where it is based on consent
The democratization of American society that started in 1820s has led to a significant change of relations between government and people. These changes include growing equality of opportunities for white men and possibility for people to influence political processes taking place in the US. While people gained new rights and chances to start another life, government was, on the one hand, set under the growing pressure of society, and on the other hand, could be constructed by people.
America by far is the most diverse country on the face of the earth. America today is known for freedom, equality, democracy, and a defender against tyranny. The foundation of American values lay in a belief of independence, nationalism, capitalism, and religion. However, many conflicts have arisen over these values in the past. Capitalism and other characteristics have made America great, but they have brought about their own set of inequalities. Those inequalities have deep roots in race, culture, gender, and wealth. In the 1800s two of the biggest conflict lies with the issue of slavery and women’s rights.
Democracy, as most people think of it today, did not exist during the first few decades of U.S. history.
The concept of white privilege helps to highlight the hypocritical nature of the American ideologies of democracy and meritocracy. Ask yourself: Do we live truly in a democratic system if the voices of our nation’s disenfranchised people are not heard? Or are we truly a nation that functions on a meritocratic system if every person-- regardless of socioeconomic background or race-- is not given the same opportunities for development? The concepts of white privilege and male privilege, as used by McIntosh, are meant to unveil the hidden schemes of American ideology.
Karen Dubinsky observes that “Nation building required more than the formation of political and economic infrastructures. In the ‘human nation,’ the proper sort of citizens, subjects with ‘character,’ was necessary” (Reumann 7). The most influential factor in the definition of “American character” for whites was their higher economic status compared to blacks. However, economic status should not be the only factor used to determine whether you should be treated as equally as another race or not. All Americans should be given the same unalienable rights, in an effort to build a highly respected and unbiased nation. However in the 1950s, whites were not
Democracy is a unique type of government, and the purpose of this essay is to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses that a democratic government provides. I will detail that many components of this type of society are both strengths and weakness as each component has beneficial aspects as well as unavoidable pitfalls.
We live in this country for the land, and the for the free as Americans we rely on many attributes in this world in order for us to live our lives. Our government has supplied us with many great things for us to be proud of. Our government is “the institutions and processes though which public policies are made for society.” (Edwards, Wattenberg, and Lineberry, p. 7). With all these institutions which includes the President, Congress, the courts and all the federal administrative agencies. These are the institutions that make up public policies for us, and to shape the way we live as Americans. The way this system has been operating through all the years has been
The idea of political culture is found within the state’s history. The history of the state is impacted by the people settled in the region, religious backgrounds, and geography. The history of the state influences the attitudes and beliefs that people hold regarding their political system. Daniel Elazar theorized a connection between the states’ history and attitude towards government by explaining differences in government between states. Every state is different with some common ground. Elazar’s theory divides states into three types: moralistic, traditionalistic and individualistic. The state’s constitution defines the powers of government with political culture bias. Because of the state constitution, the political culture
The American Political System The American political system is a federal system, which consists of