America's Role Model

First, as a new Democratic nominee running for President their economic positions are made clear. To reach the goals that Democrats want for our country 's economy, Democrats have made it their priority to cut taxes for working families and tax the rich more in tax increases. They also provide help for small businesses and homeowners. The Democratic Party is also trying to make college available for free for all Americans as well as removing companies that produce their products overseas and bringing them in the United States. “Hillary Clinton and Democrats will make certain we build and economy works for everyone, not just those at the top.”

His stance on Common Core testing is that “it’s a disaster”. “As president I’d end common core. Common Core is a disaster.” On the other hand Hillary has not yet voted her opinion on what should be done for Common Core testing, so her stance is “unknown.” Trump is against illegal immigration he stated on April 19, 2016 “illegal immigration is going to stop.” So just from this quote you can tell that he is going to stop it at no costs. Hillary said “I will stand up against any effect to deport dreamers. Immigrants are vital to our economy” on October 17, 2015. She wants to give them a full and equal path to become a

The United States has been a super power for decades, and since America has always involved themselves in other countries' problems. Instead of isolationism, the country has practiced getting involved. Since the Monroe Presidency, America has been named the World's police force. Dispelling anarchists, and stopping coos, the united states portrays itself as the world protector. Since Monroe, some Americans have felt that isolation is the way to go, and most feel that it is our right to offer assistance. Two recent incidents, Operation Desert Storm and The War in Bosnia have allowed the United States to show off it's strength, both on the military and political level. It has also given the chance for America to evaluate it's foreign policy,

The first issue that Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton disagree on is abortion. Let us take a look at Mr. Trump’s position on this topic. He is quoted as saying, “Public funding of abortion providers is an insult to people of conscience at the least and an affront to good governance at best” (Trump). He believes that “life is the most fundamental right.” Donald Trump actively opposes Planned Parenthood and disapproves of using government funds to pay for abortions. He is opposed to abortion except for rape, incest, and in cases where the life of the mother may be compromised. He would like to defund Planned Parenthood and make abortions illegal at 20 weeks unless the life of the woman is in danger by signing into law the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.

The U.S. has a history of being bad at entangling alliances. According to George Washington, “We need to be careful of tangling alliances” (Fromkin). For this reason, the United States was dragged into WWI. America should be constantly increasing its military, but for national defense, not for policing the world (Schneider). America's national security depends on America to stop getting involved in everything and to secure its borders. If America could stop spending millions on policing other countries; the weight of this task would be shifted to a group of nations that have their governments under control.

Since the Founding Fathers the United States has earned its ability to be called one of the most powerful countries in the world not only through its victories in numerous battles, but through it ability to govern its people and the world. The face of this country lies within its main leader, the president of the United States. Since our first president it has always been known as an honorary position reflecting both prestige and high status that has always been given by the American people because of their respect for the person in charge. It is a job like no other, one that holds an extreme amount of power.

Once the boarders are secure, he will take care of illegal immigrants already in the country. He will give illegal immigrants six months to register with the federal government, if they do not register, they will be violating the laws and subject as criminals. Legal immigration will continue but he will implement better policies and common sense of reform under his administration, and he will do his best to properly educate new Americans. However, in the Democrat side we have Hillary Clinton and her immigration reform with a pathway to citizenship, keep families together, and enable workers to come out of the shadows. She will end family detention and close private immigrant detention centers. She will also defend president Obama’s executive actions to provide deportation relief for DREAMers. As a president, she will work to ensure a fair immigration system. As a senator, Hillary was a strong supporter of comprehensive immigration reform. Hillary believes that we need to do more to help the millions of people who are eligible for citizenship to take that last step, help people boost their English and will work to expand fee

The end of the cold war obligated the United States once again to face the old problems which weren’t based on containment of communism. Like in the aftermath of World War 2 when America’s influence in the world was expanded, the end of the Cold War did much of the same. The problem’s the Soviet Union once had of controlling and influencing smaller countries under its thumb, now were inherited by the last super power standing, which at the time was the United States. Debate began to rise on what path America should take next on foreign policy, should the U.S commit itself to small problems or hold back its fire until a greater threat emerged?

In their book American Foreign Policy since World War 2, Steven W. Hook, and John Spanier take a historical look at American foreign policy. Since its independence, all through to the start of the 20th century, the United States had a policy of detachment. This was rooted in the believe that Europe, the only other meaningful powerful in the world in the 18th and 19th century, had intrinsic issues related to feudism that kept the continent in a constant state of war (Hook & Spanier, 2015). The U.S on its part was far away from Europe and had a unique chance to chart a different course, one free from the troubles of Europe. As a democracy free from the class systems of Europe and hence maintain peace and stability (Hook & Spanier, 2015). To maintain this peace and stability, it was in the United States interests to maintain detachment from Europe. In fact, Monroe wrote that Europe and its flawed system was evil and America should strive as much as possible to stay away from it (Hook & Spanier, 2015). However, in the 20th century, this policy of detachment was put to the test when the United States was drawn into the first and second world wars by external factors. This led the United States to get more engaged in global affairs. The idea behind engagement was to promote the ideals of democracy which, the U.S believed were the pillars of peace, as well as to protect itself from aggressors like Japan in the Second World War. After the

As we approach the next Presidential election the topic of American foreign policy is once again in the spotlight. In this paper, I will examine four major objectives of U.S. foreign policy that have persisted throughout the twentieth century and will discuss the effect of each on our nation’s recent history, with particular focus on key leaders who espoused each objective at various times. In addition, I will relate the effects of American foreign policy objectives, with special attention to their impact on the American middle class. Most importantly, this paper will discuss America’s involvement in WWI, WWII, and the Cold War to the anticipated fulfillment of these objectives—democracy,

Trump and Clinton have promised the world many thing is they become president. Trump want to work on the immigration problem in American. Trump wants to build a wall to stop people from other countries, He says there is a big problem with people coming from different countries are making lots of problems in the united states. Clinton is working on

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States was the unquestioned hegemon of the western world acting in a unipolar world. However, recently the United States has fallen into a series of deprival causing its reputation to fall as a state. Despite this, under the Bush Doctrine, the United States currently has a preemptive hegemonic imperative policy. Under this policy, the United States takes into account that the world is a perilous environment in need of a leader to guide and to control the various rebel states unipolarly. Under this policy though, the United States acts alone with no assistance from other states or institutions. Global intuitions that would assist under other types of policies are flagrantly disregarded in this policy in spite of its emphasis on the international level. As well as not participating in international institutions, this policy states that the United States should act entirely in its own wisdom. The UN (the United Nations), GATT (General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade), along with other institutions advice is not heeded within this self-made policy. Though the United States currently acknowledges these global organizations, it no longer takes them into account with severity. Instead of acting under the international system, the United States currently acts through its military, and large economy to instill fear within the various actors in the intercontinental system. According to this philosophy the

Michael Porter mentions that United State account ⅓ of the world economy growth. Which will make United State become the role model of other country because they want to be as powerful and effective as United State. They might have some difficulties becasue they are not able to provide as much freedom as United State gave to their market. Michael Porter is somehow optomize about America, but he point out that human resources is a problem is United State because people become half and half nut. He also point out that the education is also a problem in United State. I think the government should pay more attention to education becasue people are more likely to get higher salary when they are highly educated. Which mean there will be more taxes

The current international system is fragmenting rapidly since the end of the Cold War. A lot of regions in the world are still trying to find the balance of power in the international system, which the U.S. often intervenes to provide its brand of “global leadership”. Some countries like China are emerging as a global power since a few years ago. Subsequently, this will lead to a major threat to the U.S. status as a global major power. The rise of power by China in the international scene signifies the unpredictable nature of the international system. I would argue that the three most critical challenges for the U.S. arising out of this environment are the future world globalization that will cause a conflict between its domestic and foreign policy, the rise of China as a global power, and the ever globalization of terrorism. I believe that the U.S. should be pragmatic in handling its foreign policy and handle each situation independently without a fix doctrine in order to minimize the unintended consequences produced by the globalization of the world.

The USA exercises its foreign policy through financial aid. For example, scarcity relief in North Korea provides not only humanitarian aid but also a base for the development of democratic ideals and bodies.