Amiable Conversation Analysis

Furthermore, according to Duncan Carter’s article, Five Myths About Writing, “Years of well-intentioned English teachers have responded to students’ first drafts as if they were supposed to have been perfect. Combined with a pedagogy which suggests that revision is a form of punishment, it is not hard to see where students get the idea that good writers don’t have to revise” (Carter, 82). Growing up, high school teachers make it seem as if revising and editing your paper is the worst thing ever. Any student who worked long and hard on their assignment and turned it in to get revised, would hate to receive a paper back with nothing but red marks and errors written all over them. This initially gave people the mindset of forgetting about editing their work if all it did was tear them down and point out their mistakes.

In his article "Coming to Terms", Joseph Harris takes the opportunity to share his knowledge with his readers and discuss things to keep in mind when drafting, revising, and editing assignments. In this specific chapter, Harris explains the revision process and suggest possible preliminary steps to take when formulating an essay. He emphasizes revision as a knowledge practice, in which there is a consistent set of questions you can ask yourself at any point while working on a draft (page 99). In addition, Harris refers the term "writer's project" throughout the section.

Harris argues that revision is overlooked and undervalued because, as readers, we see texts in their final form and do not see the “hesitations, repetition, digressions…and flat-out mistakes of earlier drafts” (442). He then supports this idea when he demonstrates in a draft, by a student named Abhijit Mehta, the difference between editing and revising. He comments, “at the mundane level, he

Born in Boston, Massachusetts, in 1924, Donald M. Murray taught writing for many years at the University of New Hampshire, his alma mater. He has served as an editor at Time magazine, and he won the Pulitzer Prize in 1954 for editorials that appeared in the Boston Globe. Murray’s published works include novels, short stories, poetry, and sourcebooks for teachers of writing, like A Writer Teaches Writing (1968), The Craft of Revision (1991), and Learning by Teaching (1982), in which he explores aspects of the writing process. Write to Learn, (6th ed,. 1998), a textbook for college composition courses, is based on Murray’s belief that writers learn to write by writing, by taking

In “Decisions and Revisions” by Carol Berkenkotter, she was doing an experiment on unskilled writers. The main point of this article is doing a lab on Donald Murray. She wanted to see how experienced writers edited their work. She met Murray at a conference on College Composition. He introduced himself when he walked into the conference, and she asked him if he could be in a naturalist's study; He said yes. Berkenkotter had been watching him write and she had been listening to his daily recordings. Murray then discusses how he felt during the experiment.

In Nancy Sommers’ article, “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers”, she addresses how to different groups, students and experienced writers, go about revising their paper. Sommers method of taking the results of her experience could have been much more effective if she would have added details about certain thing. How did the group’s final papers turn out? Where there significant difference in the final papers, and if so what were they. Did both group turn up with nicely written papers? These questions would have helped to understand the importance of revision toward the creation of the paper, then just the revision stage itself. Sommers mention of how most students repeat themselves in their writings by just

I looked for grammar to start out with which took a little while because I had to check the punctuations and commas and see if they were placed right. Then I checked to see if all the words were spelled right and see if I was missing any words that would make a sentence better within a paragraph. After all of this was done then I went back to see if there were any quotes that needed quotation marks and I even attempted to paraphrase every now and then. That is how I went about revising both my research paper and my analysis

Typically, when most people think about the writing process they think of terms such as a ‘thesis statement,’ developing an outline, body paragraphs, conclusion; it’s imperative to view writing this way. We have only been taught THIS way of writing almost directly after we learned how to spell words—you decide what to write about, usually specified in the thesis statement, then you write a series of paragraphs entailing how you came to this conclusion. Finally, you conclude your paper by restating exactly what it was you spent an entire essay writing about. And most people will go their entire lives believing that is the formula for an effective, well thought-out work of literature. But how often do we go back and read through our writing and completely resent how amateur and forced it sounds? This is usually a direct result of a lack of revision within a work. Defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as “a change or a set of changes that corrects or improves something” and “a new version of something that has been corrected or changed,” Revision is not a common word we think of when writing—this raises a serious question: how should you revise? In response to this to this, research was conducted to find a general view as to the significance of revision within various individual’s writing processes. These results, along with research from several academic articles provide a clear description as to where revision could be

Having a crucial conversation can be difficult; however, it is essential for me to be successful in my project. I think of different ways I could approach the CNA to have this crucial conversation without any conflict and to make sure it goes as smoothly as possible, and handle the conversation in a way that will produce a better outcome. I asked the CNA to let me know when she is ready for her break, so we can take one together because I will like to talk to her about something that will improve our work relationship effectively. We went for a break, and I started the conversation by saying I would like to talk to you about some things I am noticing when we work together, I am not accusing you of anything, I just want us to talk about my observations, and I will listen to what you have to say. I explained to her about the issues in my initial post, when I started the conversation her facial expression

Metaphor’s for Revision The course of constituting a credible paper by using the writing process lies directly in what the author considers important. The writer’s ideas must relate to the reader in a particular way to encapsulate why distinct ideas must stay, and why some need to go. Barbara Tomlinson gives insight to how the revision process is essential to the success of any writer, while giving various examples that apply to what she claims as a metaphor by which every type of person can agree with. Tomlinson’s text correlates firmly with what Lakoff and Johnson state in their text pertaining to the conceptual mind and how we develop metaphors.

What are the features of your CP’s communication? Consider how they express themselves (think about verbal and non-verbal means).

People spend a significant part of their lives listening and talking, that is the main reason why conversation is regarded to be the most generalised form of talk that concerns both speakers and listeners and it is contemplated to be the essential ingredient in co-operative undertaking (Wardhaugh, 1985). Conversation is informal talk involving two or more people and interviews are a particular type of conversation. Interviews are regarded as meetings at which a journalist asks questions in order to find out the interviewee’s opinion. This is an assignment that analyses a telephone interview, so there is an absence of eye contact, body language or facial expressions that are attributes of a ‘live’

Made sure the methodology was clear and was effective in addressing the research question and problems, the population were identifies and verifies if the study was Qualitative or Quantitative Data. The result of the study was explained and last part of the journal article critiques was to review the discuss and recommendations. My process for article critiques has change; because I will include this process in my assignments. When time I retrieved an article I attempted the read the entire article to review if it matched the research question and it was taking forever. However, during class the correct way to review and article was discuss and my reading time

The first part of the rubric that I will address is Rhetorical Awareness, which is understanding and analyzing the audience, purpose, and context of a particular situation. I think all three papers display my ability to select a purpose and maintain focus on that purpose throughout the writing process. At first, the first three drafts of paper one, did not contain the appropriate format and structure needed to address my audience. Throughout the first three drafts, I tended to have difficulty condensing my thoughts into simpler sentences. So, I made sure to condense my sentences to respond appropriately to the needs of my audience. In contrast, I think that paper two, PEP for Vitamins and Gender Roles, is an excellent example of responding appropriately to a rhetorical situation from the very beginning. As a result, I did not need to make as many changes to my rhetorical analysis. In general, the structure and format for all three papers were appropriate to

What would the perfect conversation be like? Likely, there would be no absence of differing perspectives. Individuals would argue, discuss, and listen, respectfully. The goal of this podcast is to take on society's most pressing issues and innovations and strive to have just that. A perfect conversations, and through this vessel be exposed to perspectives that we agree with, that we are challenged by, that irritate, that enlighten.