Amy Davidson Summary

When Clinton was running for president a women named Gennifer Flowers opened up to the media about a 12 year affair that Clinton and Flowers had. She told the media that she was given a job in the State House of Arkansas that she was unqualified for while Clinton was president. In a 60 Minutes interview, Clinton admitted to causing “pain” in his marriage but he also said “the allegations are false” (15). This shows Clinton’s “tendency to play with words and

In their National Convention speech, both Michelle Obama and Melania Trump used rhetorical conventions to persuade the audience to elect their husbands as the next President of the United States. To begin with, both women use ethos to show the audience that their husbands are capable of becoming the next president. Both women build credibility on their husbands by voicing admirable qualities each of them have. For example, Michelle Obama states that Barack Obama is a very smart, caring, dignified, and respectful man. On the other hand, Melania Trump proclaimed that Donald Trump has great patriotism, leadership, and loyalty. All these qualities show that both presidential candidates are well suited in becoming the president. Michelle Obama and Melania Trump don’t just state that their husbands possess these qualities; they give evidence of these qualities through the use of ethos.

Madame Clinton was question about her part on Benghazi, and her emails. She was careless, but nothing was sent classified in order for her to be further questioned or to be taken in. The FBI director James Comey stated “ Hillary Clintons emails were not properly marked Classified, but a small number of emails bore the markings of possibly being classified” thus making them open it even more, but they came to the conclusion of she being careless, but she didn't do anything severe. I understand why so many people in the States may or may not like Madame Clinton, but we have to understand no one is perfect, and in the political world things can and will get tough, you just need to know how to act in those

Mr. Trump — condemning exchange bargains endorsed by Bill Clinton, among others — recommended Mrs. Clinton had neglected to enhance individuals' lives amid her decades in broad daylight life. As Mrs. Clinton shielded her record, he intruded on much of the time. "You haven't done it. You haven't done it," he said. "Pardon me." Mrs. Clinton shot back, "Donald, I know you live in your own particular reality," before proceeding with her reply.

Hillary’s tone is initially cordial, then overt curiosity and finally disapproving. Her pitch is of medium intensity. Her words are measured and precise. Conversation is initially smooth and then terse, uncomfortable and jerky.

In 2013, Amy Rosen, a partner at the Public Private Strategy Group, travels to China for her first time to advance youth entrepreneurship. Upon her arrival to Beijing, she automatically realized how westernized building, however amongst them were hutongs, shanty neighborhoods behind city walls filled with one story dwelling, where people looked like they were living as they had been for generations. Rosen mentions that as she was walking along side of small produce stands and fancy western shops owned by large international corporations, she was appalled by the attitudes towards piracy and the country’s lack of regard for intellectual property, however this was an example of an entrepreneurial people searching for and hard at work searching

(TS) There are many examples of logical fallacies in this year’s presidential campaign, but one of the main ones is Ad hominem or Name-Calling, which can be seen in many instances in presidential debates, particularly by Donald Trump, and other times when one candidate is asked to speak about the other. Understanding these fallacies and being able to spot them will help you find whom would be the superior candidate. (PS)Name-Calling is shown when Donald Trump repeatedly insulted Hillary Clinton’s character and has also made several sexist remarks, which shows that Donald Trump is making a weak argument and trying to back it up by insulting the competition. (SS)One of Donald Trump’s most common insults towards Hillary Clinton is calling her

In both editorials I find Cuddy's point of view must more believable due to actually proving how other would change when they first enter the life of the internet that's also called social media. Amy Cuddy mostly talked about how the world has changed over the newest and latest technology there is if these people get their hands on them, and most people that are addicted to these newest technology that keep showing up as ads or commercials then it proves that the person who wanted it is really into the internet. In other words, may be too addicted to the only kind of items that may cause slouching or becoming antisocial to others.

In her new memoir, “What Happened,” 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton made comments toward her previous rival Bernie Sanders. These comments addressed a number of different issues, but they all hinted toward Sanders being one reason why Clinton did not win the presidential race. Clinton believed that Sanders paved the way for the constant “Crooked Hillary” attacks through his own attacks on her character. She believes that he made these attacks to hide the fact that he could not make a policy argument against her. Clinton wrote that these remarks did damage to the Democratic party and made it challenging for her to “unify progressives in the general election and paving the way for Trump’s ‘Crooked Hillary’ campaign.” In

Though it’s not great that Hillary used a private server and lost emails, Hillary's use of a private server was not much worse than what happened under the Bush administration. In the administration, Bush got way more media coverage and scrutiny from the opposing party.

Hillary Clinton made some real valid points within her debate against Trump. From questioning if he will show us his tax reports, unto questioning his temperament. During the debate Secretary Clinton talked about what plans she had and how she would change our economy. She explained herself well with minor rambling and trying her best to stay on topic. I say “trying” only because, Mr. Trump was a real hassle during the debate, from going over the given two minute window to state his argument, unto him cutting off and speaking over Secretary Hinton and the mediator, Mr. Lester Holt. For example, the first question was “ ..How are you a better choice than your opponent to create kind jobs that will put more money in the pockets of American works?” Hillary then responds with great confidence and understanding of the question. She starts with including her granddaughter, “..Today is my granddaughter’s birthday, so I think about this a lot.” So, she starts with a pathos statement to draw in here crowd, then proceeds in telling us what her plan is, “I want us to invest in you. I want us to invest in your future. That means jobs in

I have chosen candidate Donald Trump to assess his personality traits. The moment candidate Donald Trump continually cut senator Hillary Clinton off and his tone of voice was very informative for me to determine his personality. Trump negated everything Clinton said and went as far as to not let her get a word in during her time. While I understand this is a debate, it shed light onto his personality.

From United States Senator to Secretary of State, through her progress, Hillary Clinton has shown America that she wants to make a name for herself other than “Bill Clinton’s wife”. In 2008, Hillary Clinton campaigned endlessly to gain votes from the Democratic Party; however, Barack Obama had already been named the presumptive nominee, so she decided to discontinue her campaign. Just because Clinton was not pushing to get more votes for herself does not mean that she stopped campaigning. In fact, she went on to support Obama in his presidential campaign. Obama’s term ends in 2016 and Clinton is back at it again. Beginning by publishing a video titled “Getting Started,” Clinton has put a lot of effort

She used ethos, to make audiences stand to stand on her side and support to her. she expresses ethos by giving family and community as an example of unity. She explains how family member helps each other and maintain their family status economically, emotionally, mentally and physically. She explains about the community too. How community people help each other, she explain how they maintain unity in the community and work together. Clinton explains how family help to make the community and community to the city. She uses metaphor and irony sentence to attract the attraction of the audience toward her. she gives many emotional examples like “we all are same”. She repeated this word many times in front of the audiences and make crowd to attach with her. she gives argumentative point on the defense of trump’s speech. She became able to win the audience heart and her speech was strong enough to build confidence and hope for all

Since Hillary has political experience she persuades voters with the use of logical reasoning and political rhetoric. The article Psychology of Persuasion quotes Hillary as saying, “One looks to be hunkering down with homework, research and rehearsals, while the other [Donald Trump] seems to be taking an on-the-fly casual approach to what could be the most important 90 minutes of the presidential election.” Not only is Hillary able to take jabs at Trump she is using her previous political knowledge to persuade individuals to think Trump is inexperienced and should not waste the time of citizens who are looking for change in America.