preview

Amy Zegart's Flawed By Design

Decent Essays

In her 1999 book Flawed By Design, Stanford academic Amy Zegart examines the three main American national security agencies: the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS), and the National Security Council (NSC). She covers the history of each of the agencies from creation to the 1990s. While going through each of their histories, she makes a point to break down their histories into their creations and evolutions. This breakdown allows Zegart to effectively and concisely support her conclusion that the agencies are flawed by design. Furthermore, her conclusions are relevant to the U.S. military today. Any competent military professional should learn lessons from Zegart as the lessons she offers have keen importance …show more content…

According to Zegart, the CIA, originally created to manage, not collect, all American intelligence, never became what it was intended. Instead, it became an intelligence collector and, controversially, a means of covert action on behalf of the United States. Both the JCS and NSC, which were followed the precedent set forth by the creation of the CIA. The JCS, envisioned to ensure American military interoperability, and the NSC, envisioned to help shape American foreign policy at the direction of the President, became the military and foreign policy advisors to the President without any ability to enforce the President’s directives. With each agency, the initial ideas responded to national security problems the U.S. identified during WWII. Due to influence from the U.S. military and current government agencies, Zegart concludes, the CIA, JCS, and NSC were inappropriate and ineffective since they were …show more content…

As a future military leader, two lessons from Zegart resonate strongly with me. Zegart mentions the difference between the original concepts of the agencies and what the agencies ended up being. This difference between ideas and reality can apply directly to my future role as a platoon leader. While a plan may ideal, the second-, third-, and fourth-order effects of the plan may be less than ideal. For instance, it may sound ideal to give food to a village so that they do not starve and denounce your unit. However, it is also important to consider you may make that village dependent on your unit for food. The effects of one’s actions may not always be so clear. Another lesson is the importance of compromise. During the formation of each national security agency, some service branches refused to give up their domains, such as the military intelligence agencies refusing to submit to the CIA. As a result, the CIA could not become the agency that needed to be created after WWII. Both lessons I know will remain with me and make me a competent military

Get Access