An Agreement Not Enforceable By Law Is Said To Be Void

        An injunction may also be issued. This is to prevent the negligent acts from being performed again by the defendant

An offeror will have made an offer where it appears to a reasonable person in the position of the offeree that an offer was intended.

If a voidable contract is avoided, the promisee, but not the promisor, is released from it. False, both parties are released from it

A contract is a legally obligatory promise or set of promises (Bagley, C. 2013). If this promise is broken, either party involved can be legally responsible and take the other party to court. There are four basic elements in the creation of a valid contract. The first consist of an agreement between the parties involved, by an presented offer and acceptance. The second states that the parties’ promises must be supported by something of worth, known as consideration. The third advises both parties must have the ability to enter into a contract. The fourth element states the contract must have a legal purpose (Bagley, C 2013).

A cancellation can be effected if one party breaches the contract, or a termination can occur when either party lawfully ends the contract for anything other than a breach. In this case, all executor duties are discharged on both sides but in the event of a partial breach, there is still a right to seek a remedy (lectriclaw, 2012). Procedures dealing with all aspects of contracts are a part of everyday transactions and can affect every individual on one level or another.

* Goods sold are of satisfactory condition and that they are fit for the particular purpose stated.

court may find the contract “unconscionable” There is a broad scope for this is not extremely strict and

There are many ideas about the correct basis for contractual obligation. They include promise, consideration, and cause. All jurisdictions follow at least one. In Thomas E. Davitt’s The Elements of Law, the author articulates a very credible argument for the basis for contractual obligation being one of those named above. Davitt simplifies the arguments for all of these and names one correct basis: the promise itself. Generally Thomas E. Davitt, S.J., The Elements of Law, 272 (1959). This paper will argue in favor of Davitt’s writings. The basis for contractual obligation is the promise itself. In order to effectively argue in favor of one basis over the possible others, it is necessary to discuss and rule out the others.

A contract is simply an agreement which has legal value so that it is binding on both the parties, and each of the party can enforce it lawfully in case of any contravention of the terms of agreement. For an agreement to take the form of a contract, it is necessary for it to contain four essential components of a legally binding contract . These include,

A contract is an exchange of promises or a promise in exchange for performance, for breach of which the law gives a remedy, per Restatement 2nd of Contracts §1. For the contract to be valid there has to be mutual assent, parties mutually agree upon the same specific thing. Per Restatement 2nd of Contracts §54, there are two types of contracts: unilateral, where acceptance is by performance, and bilateral, where there is an exchange of mutual promises and both of the parties have the rights and duties.

To determine whether parties have an enforceable contract, you must be familiar with two basic concepts of contract law: the Statute of Frauds and the concept of acceptance.

In special this contract, has all this requirements but it is still unenforceable because it doesn’t have so little elements that also make a contract enforceable. These are: the commencement date of the contract, party’s rights written in and not only the responsibilities, and party’s signatures and stamps.

C)Valid contracts are that enforceable at law.Void Contracts are unenforceable at law.Unenforceable contracts can’t be compelled in a court.Voidable Contracts might appear to be valid.

For example, I purchase a DVD player from my neighbor and my friend told that I can get the same DVD player at Walmart cheapest. So I decided to return and demanded my money back. This is a voidable contract both parties may avoid the contract if either so desires. Another example is a void contract is, strictly speaking without a contract. There is also a formal and informal contract. Formal contract must abide by requiring that a contract be in writing. We all know that most of the contracts are informal in

Contractual agreements are supposed to be consensual, and freely entered into by the parties involved. Therefore, ‘before a court enforces a relationship as a contract, the courts must have a reasonably certain basis in fact to justify binding the parties to each other.’ (St. John’s Law Scholarship Repository, no date). Resolution of whether a contract was intended to be legally binding is not determined by what the parties themselves thought or intended. Rather, a more objective stance is taken by the courts. This is known as the objective theory of contract, and essentially enables ‘the courts to look at external evidence (what the parties said and did at the time)’ (Poole, 2006, p. 34), as to objectively indicate the parties’ intentions