An Analysis Of Mary Shelley 's ' Frankenstein '

2383 Words10 Pages
A Gender to Love And Another to Be Loved In the novel Frankenstein, childhood development is a big theme amongst many others. The author, Mary Shelley, had personal motives to say something about it, as she had parents who raised her in a pretty open way. She was able to travel, explore the world, and fulfill her dreams. At the same time, she acknowledges that such dreams were fruitless for the women of her time by creating Elizabeth. In contrast to Shelley, Elizabeth is a character that resembled the typical woman raised to be a mother and a wife. Withal, she created Elizabeth in contrast to Victor, so that we could see the influences of parenting over the maturation of a person. In fact, Shelley makes us think how parenting is crucial to the development of a human being while making a connection with the theories of both Rousseau and Locke. For Rousseau, children are born good and it 's society that destroys their goodness while for Locke, children are born with minds as blank as slates and civilization teaches them to love and be good (Jamie Gianoutsos "Locke And Rousseau: Early Childhood Education." 2-5). Shelley creations suggest that she believed in both theories. Nevertheless, Shelley wanted to say more about the connection between adulthood and parenting, thus, she brings another factor to the table, which seems to be her own theory of human development; that the separation of gender and it 's responsibilities on the family setting are detrimental to the development
Open Document