An Element Of Self Efficacy

Employee motivation is, or at least must be, one of the key issues for directors, managers and personnel managers. The leader must be able to find the sensitive strings of his subordinates, which can be motivated by influencing them to achieve high performance. The correct use of motivation encourages staff to make more efficient use of their knowledge, skills, and talents. In today's turbulent, often chaotic environment, commercial success depends on the employee's talent and effort. Despite the many existing theories and practices, some of the motivation of leaders today remains a mystical term. This is partly due to the fact that people are motivated by different things and techniques.

According to researcher Lindner (1998), motivated employees are needed in our rapidly changing workplaces to aid in the survival of organizations. Not only is it important to meet the needs of the consumer, it is equally important that to make sure that associates are taken care of and remain motivated. For this reason, Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly and Konopaske (2012) “states much of management’s time is spent addressing the motivation of their employees” (p. 125). According to the Encyclopedia of Small Business (2007), employee motivation is the level of energy, commitment, and creativity employees bring to their jobs; the inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals (Lindner, 1988). Despite its obvious importance, employee motivation can be an elusive quest for managers due to the multiplicity of incentives that can influence employees to do their best work. The reality is that every employee has different ways to become motivated and the knowledge of how to motivate them is key to organizational success. It is imperative that employers get to know the personal needs and wants of their employees in order to establish tactics in which to motivate each of them. Once achieved, “managers are in a better position to encourage and reward employees to behave in effective ways” (Gibson et al, 2012, p.

There are as many different methods of motivating employees today as there are companies operating in the global business environment. Still, some strategies are prevalent across all organizations striving to improve employee motivation. The best employee motivation efforts will focus on what the employees deem to be important. It may be that employees within the same department of the same organization will have different motivators. Many organizations today find that flexibility in job design and reward systems has resulted in employees ' increased longevity with the company, improved productivity, and better morale.

In recent years, organizations have shown an interest in addressing the subject of employee attitude regarding their jobs and tasks. Many leaders believe that motivation is a key factor in keeping employees on a path to achievement in the workplace. Motivation as defined by Vroom (1964) is the force impelling an employee to perform a particular action. Theories of motivation started to be developed following World War II. Prior to this time, organizations had not shown any concern or interest in the increasing of employee’s productivity because social and economic conditions were such that the demand for a workforce had been less than the supply of people willing to find work.

Employees should always be motivated; this attracts talent, opens up new channels for innovation and creativity and brings in a sense of satisfaction among them which helps the growth and development of the organization.

According to the expectancy theory of motivation, in the workplace an employee’s willingness to work is dependent upon the end result of working and how important the end result is to the employee. An employee will be more compelled to put forth more effort if it is believed that the consequence of doing so will be a positive performance evaluation. The employee must believe that by achieving a positive performance evaluation, an incentive will be achieved. The incentive, whether it is monetary or advancement, must benefit the employee (Robbins, 2012).

The success of any business depends on the productivity and satisfaction of its employees. Employees need to be motivated to work. Motivation can be defined as the inner force that drives individuals to accomplish personal and organizational goals. Motivation can be either intrinsic or extrinsic. For an individual to be motivated in a work situation there must be a need, which the individual would have to perceive a possibility of satisfying through some reward. Intrinsic motivation stems from motivations that are inherent and arise from performing the task of the job itself, which the individual gets a feeling of either positive or negative motivation as a result of

The strength of individuals' self-efficacy is a powerful agent regarding their effort or willingness to attemp or complete a challenging task (Bandura, 1997, 1997). Self-efficacy is the extent to which an individual feels able to complete a task, activity, or reach a goal (Bandura, 1997, 1997). Consequently, counselors' self-efficacy may determine the likelihood and accuracy regarding how they act in unclear situation (e.g., ethical dilemmas). Effective practitioners integrate the knowledge of laws and ethical standards into their work with clients (Kocet, 2006). Therefore, the development of ethical knowledge and its integration into clinical work is an important issue to examine.

As a future physical therapist I believe that the theory most appropriate for my patient base will be the Self-efficacy theory. This model is driven by the individual and how they see themselves performing specific tasks. If they believe that they are not capable of performing a task, scared to perform and they are not confident then they have low self-efficacy. If they are confident and feel that they can perform the task they have high self-efficacy. The higher efficacy the patient feels the better odds they have at having more self motivation, putting forth more effort and recovering from their injury.

Social cognitive theory explains how everything plays a role in the way that we think. Everything including the roles other people play in our lives. Often I think that the impact the people around us have on our lives in undermined. The book refers to it as the social part of the cognitive theory. I think there is really a social part to everything. We are social beings and are forever intertwined and effected by the social aspects around us. In the podcast about encouraging self-efficacy, the author explains how teacher self-efficacy directly relates to student success. That is a prime example proving that there is a social aspect to cognitive ability. She states that self-efficacy is contagious. Believing in your abilities to be successful is directly related to your students success if you are a teacher. Your abilities and goals should involve your students.

Four SCT constructs are found to be significant predictors for dietary and physical activity behaviors, including self-efficacy, outcome expectation, self-regulation, and social support.

Motivation in the workplace is one of the major concerns that managers face when trying to encourage their employees to work harder and do what is expected of them on a day-to-day basis. According to Organizational Behavior by John R. Schermerhorn, James G. Hunt and Richard N. Osborn the definition of motivation is "the individual forces that account for the direction, level, and persistence of a person's effort expended at work." They go on to say that "motivation is a key concern in firms across the globe." Through the years there have been several theories as to what motivates employees to do their best at work. In order to better understand these theories we will apply them to a fictitious organization that has the following

Motivation is central to understanding behavior in organizations and a key managerial factor. Two aspects of motivation are structuring tasks to satisfy worker and organizational needs and providing the proper direction for worker actions (Stroh, Northcraft and Neale, 2002). There are a number of factors when it comes to the difference in worker performance. One of these factors is related to different levels of ability

Students’ self-efficacy has been the researchers’ interest and been the focus of their studies for the last thirty years due in part to the motivational, affective and behavior outcomes of Bandura’s theory of learning. Meanwhile, the achievement gap that exists between African -American and Latino students and to their White counterpart (Stinson, 2006) is not going away. As Riconscente explains that crusade to bridge the “floundering” students to the “achievers” is “at the heart of countless investigation (Riconscente, 2014). Students who are touched by lower academic achievement, students who partake in the academics and those who strive, all coexist in the public system with a varying degree of self-efficacy yet the disparity is constant. For urban schools students’ achievement is seen through the lens of what Haberman describe as the pedagogy of poverty : “a routine teaching acts of giving information, asking questions, giving directions, making assignments, monitoring seatwork, reviewing assignments, giving tests, reviewing tests, assigning homework, reviewing homework, settling disputes, punishing noncompliance, marking papers, and giving grades (as cited in Stinson, 2006, p 486). In parallel, some studies show that students are perceived as either showing a diminishing sense of self-efficacy, particularly in junior year in high school (Usher, 2008), or that a higher sense of self-efficacy was more substantial for high school and college students than for elementary

Most folks in the workforce believe they are obligated to do their best at their job simply because that is what is expected. I am one of those individuals who take pride in my job and I do it well but set a part from being a way to afford life’s expenses, I’m always in search of my legacy. The legacy I want is embodied in my desire to showcase a body of work that demonstrates the three units of intrinsic motivation that Dan Pink attributes to the most creative workers; “Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose” (Pink 2009). On the other hand, there are those folks out there that want to only do as much as they can get away with doing. Regardless of which type of employee makes up, an organization, leaders need to understand the science and application of motivation in business processes. Motivation comes in many forms such as money, benefits, or simple recognition; extrinsic and intrinsic. The right type of motivation can lead to exponentially higher productivity and profits and that is what we are all looking for in business.