An Ethical Analysis Of Against Capital Punishment

Good Essays

An Ethical Analysis against Capital Punishment
This paper compares and contrasts the two different ethical perspectives for and against Capital Punishment. Capital Punishment is a very sensitive subject because it touches on many important topics such as justice, costs, humaneness and religion. People have different perspectives on these topics so it’s hard for everyone to agree on what we think the right thing is.
Most people that are for Capital Punishment believe that “Justice is better served” when the offender is put to death (Messerli, 2011). However, noted that “numerous families and loved ones of murder victims support alternatives to the death penalty for many reasons, including: the death penalty process is a traumatizing experience for families…Life without parole provides certain punishment without the endless reopening of wounds (Death Penalty).” Therefore, whose opinion should really matter on this issue? Should either the people that don’t know how it feels to have a loved one hurt or killed and the people that hold grudges and strive for revenge, views on the fate of offenders matter? Or should the victims’ families opinions matter the most because they are the ones suffering during the long death penalty process? For the people that are wrongfully accused, the death penalty is the opposite of justice. A man named Ernest (Shujaa) Graham was convicted in 1976 for first degree murder and was sentenced to death. After

Get Access