An Evaluation Of An Employee Is Morally Justified By Informing The Government Or Media

The whistleblower is trying to prevent the company from getting into a deeper trouble in the future that can possibly impacts consumers and other workers.When the company is doing illegal activities, it shows that they’re breaking the rule in the first place; therefore, it is right to report that. One should do what is right to prevent fraud and illegal activities in their company because it is an act of loyalty. Consequences shouldn’t be an issue if one is telling the truth and helps prevent illegal activities. For example, a whistleblower can accuse their co-worker of something they didn’t do just to get rewards. In the end, when the truth comes out, this is where consequences come from.

Several theories indicate why the whistle-blowing process has become more prevalent and characteristics or processes encourage individuals to come forward a report instances of wrongdoing or making organizational behaviors public knowledge (Lennane, 2012). The process of whistle-blowing often involves an individual being conflicted between loyalty to their organization or their belief that they have a responsibility to protect public interest above the practices of their organization (Soma & Nirmala, 2011). Individuals may attempt to initiate

Ms. Williams is a typical of a whistle-blower in the sense that whistle-blowers are willing to face retaliation from their employer. Janet P. Near, a professor at the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University who has studied whistleblowing since 1980 stated that “If they [whistle-blowers] cannot suffer retaliation from their employer, we don’t count them” (Melnick, 2014, para 6). In many specialized industries, everyone knows each other so it is not unusual for whistle-blowers who get fired to have trouble finding work within the same industry. Near indicates that whistle-blowing is less about the psychology of an individual, but more about the severity of the situation unmasked (Melnick, 2014). C. Frederick Alford, political psychology professor and author of Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power stated whistle-blower arrive late at the realization that what people do and what they say are two different things so they are naïve in a certain sense (Melnick, 2014). As a result, they are shocked when they realize people lie, cheat, steal, and whatever (Melnick, 2014). Therefore, Near insists “What seems to predict whether someone will actually blow the whistle is: how serious the wrongdoing is, if they are very sure it happened and so on ... Situational characteristics rather

Whistleblowing is the act that employees commit when they cry foul on their own organization for misdoings, corruption and illegality. I shall argue that whistleblowing in the workplace is “sometimes permissible” in order to keep businesses and corporations in check. I shall do so by presenting the best argument for whistleblowing to be “sometimes permissible” and not “always permissible”.

A “whistleblower” is the one who informs against another. The term likely brings to mind famous cases surrounding highly publicized criminal acts, such as Sherron Watkins exposing Enron’s fraudulent stock inflation or even “Deep Throat” revealing details that brought to light the Watergate scandal. These are major cases involving elaborate trials and major media attention, but that’s not how everyday whistleblowing occurs. Although the wrongdoing taking place in various workplaces, agencies, government, and organizations may not constitute large-scale criminal acts, they still pose significant challenges to the potential whistleblower who may feel a moral obligation to report what he or she has witnessed.

During the G20 summit in Seoul 2010, the whistleblower protection law was evaluated across the countries and Australia was one of the highly rated countries with US and Canada in the public sector (Wolfe. 2014, p. 4). On the contrary, the level of whistleblower protection in the private sector is found weaker than the public sector (Wolfe. 2014, p. 4). This report critically examines the current protection regime in both public and private sectors and depicts the lives of whistleblowers after disclosing the wrongdoings of the organisation to our society. Despite the legislative requirement to establish stronger whistleblower protection law in Australia, it is not applied

Businesses today, more than ever, are under scrutiny by the public and its stakeholders. With an enormous pressure to be ethical, businesses produce and implement policies for the organization to abide by. On the other hand, it may be easier for businesses to think in their best interest than the interest of the public, causing unethical behavior. Then, a business may have employees that feel an obligation to the public and society to expose its negligence. Whistleblowers are “people who expose negligence, abuse or danger such as professional misconduct or incompetence that exists in the organization in which they work” (Ray 438). Whistleblowing transpires when an employee unearths an action to the public, either out of responsibility to their

The point can be made that “whistleblowing” within a firm, large or small can be encouraged by putting in place policies and a process within a firm that will protect the employee’s and benefit the organisation by:

Whistle blowing occurs when an employer asks an employee to do something immoral, such as falsifying data or offering bribes. The employee may “blow the whistle” on the company revealing the immoral and most times, illegal practice(s) which will result in them losing their job and are blacklisted from the industry, leaving them without a way to support themselves and their families. When deliberating on blowing the whistle, the employee becomes an ethical egoist. The employee focuses on his or her self-interest which determines what they should do in the situation (Rae,

Over the last forty years this country has seen an increase in corruption and greed both within the corporate world as well as within our own government. Since that time Whistleblowing, or the deliberate non-obligatory act of disclosure, which gets onto public record and is made by a person who has or had privileged access to data or information of an organization, about non-trivial illegality or other wrongdoing whether actual, suspected or anticipated which implicates and is under control of that organization, to an external entity having potential to rectify the wrongdoing.1 Both federal and state statutes and regulations have been created to protect these individuals from various forms of retaliation. Even without a statute,

The role of ethics permeates all realms of society, in particular, the workforce, as employees from different cultural backgrounds comprise the make-up of worldwide companies. Peng Wen and Cheng Chen (2016) conducted a study in China titled How Does Ethical Leadership Influence Employees’ Whistleblowing Intention? Evidence from China, which provides beneficial data into ethics and the workplace. I will expound on possible issues with the article, interrelated topics, benefits of evaluating differing positions, and personal ideas relating to this subject.

The other two types of whistle blowing that occur are personal and impersonal, where the wrongdoing is be done upon the whistle blower and impersonal where harm is observed upon another. In many cases whistle blowing is believed to occur when an employee’s loyalty or attachment is in opposition to their job commitment and job satisfaction. When whistle blowing happens it may have a detrimental effect on relationships between the whistleblower and their co-workers. This can create enemies between fellow employees; the whistle blower may be avoided and mistrusted. “Indeed, whistle-blowing can be discouraged or even punished when the image of the whistle blower is seen as “disloyal” to the organization posing risk of normalizing wrongdoing and ultimately derive the public interest.” (Ashforth & Anand, 2003)

The foundation for morals and ethics are guides to human behavior stemming from our intrinsic disposition as social creatures. Morals are defined as “social elements that tend to have greater social value accordance with standards of right and wrong” and ethics as the “study of problems which seeks to discover how one ought to act” (PhilosophyLander Edu). As social creatures the fear of rejection or being judged as an outcast is frightening. This drives us to become conformist avoiding the feeling of belittlement from our person the other hand being a non conformist can bring about serious consequences often becoming ostracized for speaking out. The act of whistle blowing or in other words “snitching,” is a controversial topic perceived by some as an action of bravery stemming from a commitment to ethics and to others as a disloyal and untrustworthy action. Whistle blowers play a critical role in government accountability, some whistle blowers are seen as heroes, but others are controversial. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo was an 18 year employee at the US EPA, who blew the whistle on discrimination in addition to a U. S multinational corporation that endangered South African vanadium mine workers. In her book, No Fear: The Whistle blower 's Triumph Over Corruption and Retaliation at the EPA, she details the pressure, name-calling and death threats that she says she received after refusing to keep quiet. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo’s act of whistle blowing brings into view the importance

However, can we say the whistleblowing is ethical, as a lot of lives can be ruined just on accusation? What are the main issues about blowing the whistle? To answer those questions, I’ll lay my observations on the William Cohan article on Wall Street whistle-blowers and especially with the case of Eric Ben-Artzi, former analyst at the Deutsche Bank, and apply it some business ethics theories.

Assessing the Organization’s Internal Whistleblowing System is the last step to build a whistleblower system. Find out employees’ opinions about the organization’s culture and specifically seek employee views on the organization’s commitment to ethics and values. Four Questions should be taken into considered when assess the internal whistleblowing system: a) Does the organization have a code of conduct? b) Are employees aware of it? c) Does the company train on what is an ethical breach? d) Have there been recent breaches and how were they addressed?