An Evaluation of Security Acts and Models Essay

As human beings and citizens of the world, everyone values their privacy. It is a right that is often looked over and taken for granted by most. Since the beginning of time, there have been concerns about individuals’ rights to privacy and their personal information remaining confidential. Our founding fathers had concerns about this which is why, “…this right has developed into

America was founded of the ideals of free speech and equality, but if one tries to exercise these rights to the fullest extent, one’s privacy would be jeopardized. The purpose

The consumer expects that when using a public computer for a specified task such as printing through a service, that the data or material is protected from other users including employees. When using a public computer for internet surfing, tax filing banking, etc. the general public user does not always think about the threats to security of their own personal information. It is important for the company to protect the users in addition to the users understanding the potential threats that exist when entering personal information.

Since then, people have obtained a large variety of new and diverse communications devices. In 2001, the USA Patriot Act was established after the 9/11 horror, which changed the specifications of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) wiretaps regarding particularity from one instrument to one person (any property/device associated with him/her). This way, law enforcement authorities were finally allowed to catch up with technological

Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) – This refers to a U.S. law that was enacted in 2002 to lay down a comprehensive framework on how government information are protected. This also relates to operations and assets against natural or man-made threats. This act assigns responsibilities to federal agencies that re responsible for system and data protection, ensuring that all elements of FISMA are complied to, and integration of security measures throughout federal agencies in cost-effective, timely and efficient manner (. FISMA regulations require that inspection of the agencies be done annually through an independent evaluation (Gibson, 2010, pg. 59). The evaluation seeks to test the effectiveness of policies and practices in agencies and compile a report that identifies the state of compliance of that agency.

"We Need Privacy Laws for the Digital Era | The Nation." The Nation, 8 Jan. 2014. Web. 21 Oct. 2016.

The essential legal policies for instituting an information security policy for any organization, regardless of tax status, such as commercial, non-profit entity or a federal agency and how those policies, both governmental and organizational, can impact an organization’s ability to ensure the integral information security triad of confidentiality, integrity and availability.

Our Bill of Rights, consider privacy as a legal element of human rights. Privacy restrains our government and the private sector to both act in ways that don’t threaten individuals’ privacy. For this basic reason, the Privacy Act was enacted in 1974 by The Department of Justice. The Privacy Act of 1974 defines by governing how information is collected, maintained, used, and disseminated about individuals in systems of records by federal agencies. The Privacy Act requires that agencies give the public notice of their systems of records by publication in the Federal Register. The Privacy Act

The Homeland Security Act of 2002 impacted the American people without many of them realizing it. The act called for increased monitoring of computer networks, phone lines, and online history inside the United States and allowed the government to deport suspects (ACLU). What was created by the act has snaked its way into all aspects of our lives, creating a sense of order and restricting some freedom. However, some say that this imposition into our daily lives limits our freedoms and actions allowed us by the Constitution. Many interest groups voice strong resentment for the act while others try to demonstrate the strengths and triumphs of the Homeland Security Act. This paper will show the differing viewpoints of those that feel that the

citizens a common law right to privacy against publications (Murray, 1997). The common law right to privacy has evolved through time, and the United States had reacted differently to specific information privacy concerns. Dimov (2013) reported, interestingly, that on the federal level, the United States sustained a sectorial method towards data protection legislation in which certain industries are protected and others are not (p. 4). The following are three federal data protection laws indicated as of great importance in the United States: (1) Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) - governs the collection and distribution of health and financial data; (2) Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA) - protects

One of the first post-9/11 legislative measures addressing information security of the government assets was the E-Government Act of 2002 and specifically one of its provisions, the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of 2002. Some of the notable purposes of this Act were to “provide a comprehensive framework

As technology grows and information has become a critical asset companies currently are devoted their resource and money to protect their data as important as their finance and human resource assets.

The right of privacy has developed to protect four main areas of privacy: (1) intrusion, (2) publication of private facts, (3) delineation in a false light, and (4) appropriation, unauthorized commercial exploitation of a person’s name or likeness. (Middleton, Lee & Chamberlin, 2005)

The purpose for an IT security policy is to provide “strategy, policy, and standards regarding the security of and operations in cyberspace, and encompasses the full range of threat reduction, vulnerability reduction, deterrence, international engagement, incident response, resiliency, and recovery policies and activities, including computer network operations, information assurance, law enforcement, diplomacy, military, and intelligence missions as they relate to the security and stability of the global information and communications infrastructure” ("Cyberspace policy RevIew", 2016).

Security plays a major role in both the business and government worlds. We will discuss the legal aspects of organizational security management. Discuss both the positive and negative influences regarding organizational security. We will also be discussing what consequences will both business and government operations have to overcome if they fail to achieve security goals and objectives. The value private security management brings to businesses will also be discussed.