An Examination And Evaluation Of How Each Of The Principles Essay

A physician must understand that when it comes to deciding to withhold or withdraw life sustaining treatment it is ultimately the patient’s decision unless the patient is not competent enough to make this choice. I believe that a person can lose their life at any point. Death is certain and no one can run from it. In my opinion, a patient’s autonomy is of utmost importance anytime during healthcare however the physician can name some recommendations of what would be the best option for the patient. When it comes to patients they deserve to be treated with respect and ultimately be treated as an end not as a means to an end.

If a Jehovah witness comes into the hospital in need of a blood transfusion the doctors and nurses must respect the patient’s wishes not to have a blood transfusion.

The purpose of this paper is to identify the characteristics, values and beliefs of Jehovah’s Witness group. It will discuss their reasoning for refusal to accept blood transfusions. The paper will elaborate on the best approach to offer appropriate care, advice and education while treating patients with respect in regards to their religious beliefs. British Journal of Nursing (2009) suggests that good, honest communication, without any element of coercion or scare tactics, is the key in the management of Jehovah’s Witness patients.

Jehovah's witnesses’ faith allows them to seek medical help; however, they do not accept blood transfusions. This belief arises from a biblical passage that states "Only flesh with its soul- its blood-you must not eat (Genesis 9:3-4), "You must not eat the blood of any sort of flesh, because the soul of every sort of flesh is its blood. I will set my face against that person who eats blood...Anyone eating it will be cut off” (Leviticus 17:10, 13-14). These passages are interpreted by Jehovah's witnesses as forbidding the transfusion of any blood products. The following presentation will address legal and ethical issues that can arise from this scenario.

Allowing someone to die: Some religious affiliations (Jehovah’s witness) will not receive a blood transfusion. They have decided not to take advantage of medical technology to preserve life. If such person is in a life & death situation and required a blood transfusion in order to survive the choose to die vs. receiving a blood transfusion.

Autonomy includes three primary conditions: (1) liberty (independence from controlling influences), (2) agency (capacity for intentional action), and (3) understanding (through informed consent) (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009, p. 100). According to Beauchamp & Childress (2009) to respect autonomous agents, one must acknowledge their right to hold views, to make choices, and to take actions based on their personal values and beliefs (p. 103). Respect for autonomy implies thaturges caregivers to respect theassist a patient in achieving? Heed? the autonomous choices of their patients. From there, patients can act intentionally and with full understanding when evaluating medical treatment modalities. Autonomy also includes a set of rules, one of which requires that providers honor patient decision-making rights by providing the truth, also known as veracity (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009, p. 103). In this case, several facets of the principle of respecting autonomy, specifically veracity, informed

2. generally right to decide treatment: Patients generally have the right to decide their treatment however; others measures of treatment should be discussed with the patients. Patients should be competent when deciding to refuse treatment and understand what their options are, however; this should not include physician assisted suicide. Patients do not have to suffer or be in pain, there are many medical options to help the patient through palliative care that will keep them comfortable.

For many people Christianity is the religion of choice and a way of life. Jehovah?s Witnesses are one subgroup of the Christian faith. The JW religion was founded in 1872 by Charles Taze Russell. They comprise 1.2 million of the U.S. population (Campbell, Y., Machan M., & Fisher, M., 2016). They present a unique challenge to the medical community because of their stance on blood transfusions. Part I will provide a

The idea of a privilege to reject treatment was based on fundamental rights to security, break even with assurance under the law, and due process. At the end of the day, automatically hospitalized patients still have a privilege to choose what happens to their bodies. The privilege of a patient to reject treatment depends on five sacred insurances the eighth amendment's assurance against merciless and abnormal discipline the first alteration's assurance of free discourse (opportunity of thought/thoughts) the first revision's assurance of flexibility of religion the all the more extensively translated appropriate to protection the fourteenth amendment's insurance of freedom (the privilege to be free from unjustified interruptions on

This declaration and the following directions are an expression of my legal right to refuse medical care and treatment. I expect and trust the above-mentioned parties to regard them as legally and morally bound to act in accordance with my wishes, desires, and preferences. The above-mentioned parties should therefore be free from any legal liabilities for having followed this declaration and the directions that it contains.

Patient refusal could result from misinterpreting what is said during difficult situations of decision making or due to denial of the truly bad situation, poor registration of bad news or even confusion by multiple sources of information. In addition,

This idea of knowing what is best for the patient beyond his or her own decisions is the idea of paternalism. Paternalism is toxic to medicine, as it belittles the patient and creates barriers between the provider and patient. Patients are humans and as a human we have a right to know what is happening with our own bodies and most importantly have the right to decide what will happen to our bodies. If a patient wants to question a treatment, request a treatment or deny a treatment it is their decision to do so. Patient autonomy cannot be overlooked, as it is the foundation of health care.

The ethical dilemma of Jehovah Witness refusal of blood stems from this contradiction that is clearly against the goals of a healthcare provider, causing stress for nurses and an ethical dilemma that at times leads to legal intervention. The ethical dilemma is even

Amongst religions, each one holds a variety of practices and beliefs. "The religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every... man to exercise it as these may dictate." - James Madison. This quote states that every man has their own right to believe and practice whatever they please. Child Jehovah witnesses should not be forced to be held back from undergoing blood transfusions when needed because although religious freedom exists, it is their individual uninfluenced choice and because it should not be left to the parent's decisions based on their religious beliefs'.

As health care consumers, everyone has certain rights; this is often referred to as a Patient’s Bill of Rights. While there is not a universal Patient’s Bill of Rights, it typically addresses an individual’s right to information concerning their condition and treatment options, and autonomy over their medical treatment decisions. This means that individuals have the right to choose what medical treatments they may or may not want to receive. You have the right to refuse treatment that has been recommended by your treating physician, as long as you understand the nature and consequences of the health care decision, even if it might prolong your life (Patients, 2016.)