An Experiment On Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Essay

The overall process of discharging a patient from a hospital and the transition back home or to a care facility are critical advancements in the overall course of both acute and long-term care. It is important that the hospitals releasing these patients have ensured the proper overall course of care from beginning to end. The lack of consistency with both the discharge process and the quality of discharge planning has led to many avoidable readmissions. To reduce the amount of hospital readmissions, it is imperative that hospitals recognize the need for focused patient care and that programs are being implemented to assist in the care transition.

Readmission to a hospital creates strain and added expense for the patient and hospital; in 2011, hospital costs due to readmission were almost $41.3 billion (Hines, Barrett, Jiang, & Steiner, 2014; Rau, 2014). There are many aspects of healthcare associated with readmission, such as lack of discharge planning and education, which need to be addressed i to decrease the amount of preventable re-hospitalizations.

This model reimburses hospitals based on quality of care instead of the volume of patients. The quality of care is assessed by patient questionnaires and if hospitals are unsatisfactory penalties may be imposed (Edwoldt, 2012). The value-based system also affects Medicare and Medicaid. It was reported that Medicare readmissions within 30 days of discharge cost 17 billion dollars annually (Edwoldt, 2012). Due to the high costs of readmissions Medicare and Medicaid have implemented a Hospital Readmission Reduction program. A formula is utilized to evaluate readmission rates within 30 days of discharge for any medical reason related to their original admission such as heart failure and pneumonia. Upon review the hospital is potentially penalized. It is important that nurses strive to provide excellence in care despite their beliefs on the ACA. Nurses have the ability to provide a safe patient environment and reduce the risk of hospital associated infections by following hospital protocols such as hand washing.

Hospital readmissions are potentially harmful, costly and often times an avoidable event. Between the provisions set forth under the Affordable Care Act and the penalties authorized by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services, hospitals are forced to shift their focus towards the development of strategies to reduce and prevent avoidable hospital readmissions related to heart failure. It is estimated that of the 6 million individuals within the United States diagnosed with heart failure, 1 million of them are hospitalized each year with a primary diagnosis of heart failure, accounting for $17 billion dollars of Medicare expenditures (Sales et al, 2013). What is worse is the death rate associated with heart failure each year, accounting

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) added to the Social Security Act has increased the financial accountability of healthcare organizations for preventable readmissions. Hospitals have increased their awareness and are looking for system ways to assist in the reduction. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have initiated a process for decreasing the reimbursement for readmitted patients within a 30-day period. CMS identified readmission measures for applicable conditions of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), pneumonia and in 2015 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hip and knee replacement which are included within the measurement to calculate the readmission payment adjustment for

This article reviews the history of Medicare’s Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) which began in October 2012. It examines why Medicare and Medicaid initiated the program, clarifies what conditions were originally included in HRRP and analyzes the reasoning behind adding Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) to the list of high priority conditions. It also, clarifies what information U.S Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) take into consideration when calculating readmission rates and points to the fact that high readmission rates could be due to non-hospital factors. The authors review new data that focuses on the potential harm of adding COPD to the list of conditions due to the increased level of patients from lower

The Affordable Care Act was enacted to improve health care and to lower health care cost in America. The ACA developed different strategies to meet these goals called the “pay for performance” programs. These strategies are aimed at the different providers to improve quality care. The strategy that I selected is the “Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program” this program/strategy is also known as the HRRP and was begun in October of 2012. HRRP is aimed at hospitals and penalizes hospitals that have a high 30 day readmission rate. The penalties are assessed and based on a number of comparisons, those such as, performance, patient demographics, comorbidities and frailty.

Healthcare in the U.S is most expensive than any other developed country. The U.S spends far more on per capita as compared to any other developed. U.S scores low on many outcome measures, inefficiencies and wastes and quality measures as compared to other countries. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is developed to strengthen these failures in the health care system. The U.S healthcare is transforming care from volume based reimbursements to value based payments. The healthcare law works around providing more patient centered care and better preventive care. One of the payment reforms with Obamacare is to penalize the hospitals with high readmission rates for the three conditions – Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failures and Pneumonia.

To encourage efforts of hospitals to reduce readmission, the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) was created under Affordable Care Act. The HRRP is mainly a payment penalty program designed to reduce hospital readmission rates for medically expensive conditions- such as heart attack, pneumonia, health failure (penalties levied in 2013 - ‘14). Under this program, hospitals with readmission rates that exceed the national average are penalized by payment cut across all-of their Medicare admissions. For 2015, CMS has added COPD, and elective hip or knee replacement, while types of pneumonia cases following CABG are included starting 2017. In addition to new conditions, the maximum penalty will increase up to 3 percent of the Medicare payment. This penalty is not limited to only above mentioned six conditions, but apply to all Medicare patients. (For HRRP program overview, see attachement-1)

Policy makers created the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) in an attempt to improve quality of patient care and lower costs (James, 2013). In order to avoid these penalties, healthcare leaders must recognize that CMS has identified a correlation between readmissions and a lack of quality care. Therefore, the aim is not to focus solely on hospital readmissions, but to seek clinical excellence by investing in quality improvement (Silow-Carrol, Edwards & Lashbrook, 2011). However, reducing readmissions is a complex undertaking, because not all readmissions can or should be prevented. Indeed, some readmissions are planned as part of sound clinical care. Furthermore, while hospitals work to reduce readmissions caused

The health care organizations have big opportunity to improve their quality of healthcare service as well as improve life quality of customers through reducing an avoidable readmission. The readmission is defined by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS) “Admission to a subsection hospital within 30 days of a discharge from the same or another subsection hospital” Hoffman, J.H. (2012). Readmissions can be classified four different categories, including (1) Planned readmission which the reason of the readmission is related to the initial admission. For example, reconstructive surgery with subsequent steps or it could be series of treatment such as cancer chemotherapy. (2) Planned but the reason is not related to the initial readmission.

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have proposed policies that will penalize healthcare organizations for the increasing readmission rate related to patients who has been diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). This readmission policy is part of the CMS Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) which was enacted to further address the diminishing quality of health care services and to curb the rising cost of health care services by providing financial incentives to healthcare organization in order to promote gravitation toward Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) or Managed Care Organization (MCO). The main objective of levying reimbursement penalties on healthcare organizations is to move away from the fee-for-service method of reimbursement toward a patient-centric, and disease management approach where healthcare services are coordinated not just in the acute phase of disease, but also in the chronic of phase disease.

All over the world, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a very significant and prevalent cause of morbidity and mortality, and it is increasing with time (Hurd, 2000; Pauwels, 2000; Petty, 2000). Due to the factor of COPD being an underdiagnosed and undertreated disease, the epidemiology (Pauwels, Rabe, 2004) is about 60 to 85 % with mild or moderate COPD remaining undiagnosed (Miravitlles et al., 2009; Hvidsten et al., 2010).

The authors stressed the financial importance of reducing readmission rates for COPD. They highlighted data which demonstrates that COPD hospital admissions and, therefore, costs are on the rise and projected to increase 60% by the year 2030. The authors analyzed 44 patient stays to determine if bundled care decreased readmission rates for COPD patients. Their data and conclusions support my proposal, that bundled care can decrease readmission rates for patients with

For years, healthcare costs have continued to increase in the United States and policymakers are constantly trying to find ways to reduce spending. According to reports, in 2011, about $900 billion out of the $2.6 trillion annual health care spending was wasteful spending. In the following year, there was a reported $690 billion wasted annually on healthcare. This wasteful spending is attributed to ineffective health care delivery, cost of adverse events, and poor care coordination that has led to avoidable readmissions (Lallemand, 2012). In the United States, readmissions are the highest amongst patients with chronic diseases accounting for about 90% of avoidable readmissions in 30 days after discharge, and costing the industry an estimated $17 billion. These readmissions are a result of inadequate discharge planning, lack of follow-up, and lack of education on disease management (Jayakody et al., 2016). Policymakers on the federal and state level have developed and implemented several programs, some varying state to state, to help reduce wasteful spending while improving quality of care.