An Overview Of Innovation Support System

There are various internal and external factors that can influence the development of innovations positively or negatively. External factors may include firm size, market structure, degree of industry concentration, and macroeconomic factors. Size of the firm tend to be more positive related to innovation in manufacturing and profit-making organizations as compared to non-profit making organization, and relationship that involves size and innovation will become stronger if a non-personnel or a long transformation measure of size has been applied, as compared to application of a personnel or a raw measure of size. Depending on the competition within the market for example a positive competition with favorable atmosphere, the firm will be successful in its kind of innovation. The way industries have been structured and how they change over time may have effect to the innovation among organizations. Their standards, the institutional setting and the process of liberalization and privatization also affect innovation.

It was amid a midyear break when the inverter at my place required an overhauling which was expected by organization 's arrangement. In any case, the organization lost a track of its past records that demonstrated the third due administration. After a great deal of bothers and protests the issue was settled. Notwithstanding, this occurrence made me end with that organization and joining another. A large number of companies are unable to keep up the track of their administrations which causes them a big time loss.

Through innovation in technology, the space exploration programs of the United States have achieved several benefits for today’s society. Many studies have shown that space programs have encouraged innovation of various

It is intended both to provide thumbnail descriptions of the various intellectual property regimes to economists working in this area and to indicate where additional economic research might be useful. The other papers in this symposium provide important examples of ongoing research on the economics of intellectual property. Suzanne Scotchmer analyzes the complex effects of patent protection when innovation is cumulative. Rather than analyzing situations in which several firms vie to develop the same innovation-the approach of the "patent race" literature-her analysis examines circumstances in which only one firm can develop an initial innovation but others can also build upon it. She focuses on how the incentive to develop both the initial and subsequent inventions may be affected by the scope of patent protection. Janusz Ordover considers ways of adjusting the patent system that may help to both provide returns to the inventor, and encourage the diffusion of the innovation in the economy. His paper is part of a line of work that explores the place of the intellectual property system among the large number of institutions that affect the amount and nature of research and development that takes place. In the final paper, David

Poor Technological Development: Due to poor infrastructure of R&D and unskilled employees, technological innovations may not possible

In the Military-Industrial Complex Speech, President Dwight D. Eisenhower admits that “in this [technological] revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.” (Eisenhower 1) He notes that the “solitary inventor” is “being overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields” and warns that “a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity.” This is significant because during a period in which government authority and decision making is being questioned to the core, the government’s increased involvement with the direction of scientific and technological research, and by extent education in itself, is deeply concerning the to the 1960s activists. They had reason to believe that the government did not know best, and suspected that the government’s increased role in universities and research could be mishandled. This message is echoed by President Eisenhower, as he warns of the “recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties.” (Eisenhower 2) He warns of an overreliance on technology and science, cautioning that people should not

In the second half of the 20th century, space exploration was controlled by government agencies, and during that time, the field experienced slower growth due to a low focus on space exploration caused by a higher priority placed on politics. Because government space agencies are run by people in the federal government, this association comes with various implications which all come from the industry’s connection to politics. These implications slow the growth of the industry in different ways, and the first of these implications is congressional approval. Economist Raymond Keating argues that one reason why public agencies have failed to innovate the field of space exploration is because of the slow pace of the legal process: “Whatever [the

I have traveled to many countries, and when I moved to the U.S. I was impressed with their technologies and advancement. Advancement of technology requires the unification of talents and ideas. The more diverse the ideas are the better the innovation can be. This is what I learned looking at the technology and advancement in the U.S. One of the advancements I talk about is the space program, which really excites me about the future.

In the early 1970s the process of industrial innovation was commonly assumed as the “linear progression”, through development of technology in organizations, to marketplace, that became the “technology push model”. And in “mid 1960s- early 1970s period” appears 2ndgeneration of “Innovation model”, alluded to as "market pull innovation model”. In accordance with “simple sequential model”, the marketplace was new ideas as a source for controlling “R&D” that had a responsive role in innovation process. That is “demand pull” model. Individuals obtained this theory due to their restricted vision then. They considered science as the origin and cause of innovation. Consequently they believed that high investment leads to novel innovative product production (Balconi, Brusoni & Orsenigo 2010). Clearly, the one reason of innovation is scientific research. In the 20th century, several big companies, like “Ford, Philips, ICI and Western Electric”, put money on the research laboratory. They fed the quickly emerging markets for vehicles, industrial chemicals and electrical products for consumers with the “science and technology” assistance and structured efforts for “research and development” built steady innovation streams. The other main aspect is demand, where it can be easily understood. The needs of

The authors of the article, “Innovation: Location Matters” are Michael Porter and Scott Stern. Michael Porter is an economist, researcher, author, advisor, speaker and teacher. Throughout his career at Harvard Business School, he has brought economic theory and strategy concepts to bear on many of the most challenging problems facing corporations, economies and societies, including market competition and company strategy, economic development, the environment, and health care. His extensive research is widely recognized in governments, corporations, NGOs, and academic circles around the globe. His research has received numerous awards, and he is the most cited scholar today in economics and

Innovation is normally used to denote the process that takes place when a product or a process is developed, from idea to market; the concept of invention only denotes the process that takes place when new ideas or solutions are generated. Baumol (2002) argues “is it possible to have lots of inventions and still lack innovations. Nevertheless, inventions are a necessary precondition for innovation”.

This shows an influence on of the presence of cluster strategy as a specialization effect potentially leading to regional economic growth.

According to Boja (2011), there are four economic agglomeration types; these types differ according to the type of firms within the agglomeration, the economic efficiency and flexibility and the innovation (figure #). Clusters are formed by firms that conduct activities in the same field and in which innovation is an important factor that stimulate the competition and the firms' growth.

T h e c u rren t is su e a n d fu ll te x t a rc h iv e o f th is jo u rn a l is a v a ila b le a t http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0144-3577.htm

As a concept that has become common since the 1990s, globalization is described as the technological, economic, cultural, ideological, and economic changes across borders. It can also be regarded as the transformation of the global economy through the anarchy of financial markets or a technological revolution with social impacts. In contrast, regionalization is the growth of societal integration within a specific area that incorporates all the undirected procedures of economic and social interactions among the units in the region. Since these concepts are different in nature, they contain various strategies that are only effective in specific situations.