Analysis: College Athletes Should Get Paid

There is always that question being asked about whether or not college athletes should be paid. The article College Athletes Getting Paid? Here Are Some Pros And Cons from the “Huffington Post” by Malcolm Lemmons argues that there is no right or wrong answer to the question at hand. However, to some the idea of college athletes being paid is absurd, while to others not so much. This article touches on many different factors from race to financial status of the players.

In the sports world you hear the question, should college athletes really get paid? If you read the articles by sports writers, for ESPN and Fox Sports, you hear both sides of the story. One person at ESPN, Michael Wilbon, believes that college athletes deserve to get paid, and here is his reason why “We’re talking $11 billion for three weekends of television per year. On top of that there’s a four-year contract with ESPN that pays the BCS* $500 million, and combined that’s $10 billion, would the games not be televised?” “As Jon Solomon, from CBS Sports pointed out, the NCAA* went to court to settle the debate, should college athletes, in football and basketball, get paid for their image, names and likeliness?”.

All over the world people would love to get paid for being a college athlete, which this is

First, some say that college athletes should be paid because of the fact that the schools and the NCAA make billions. In an article from USA Today, it stated: “NCAA made more than $1 billion for the year” (Mama). On the other hand, they should not be paid because tons of the athletes get scholarships, they are rewarded with a free education, and they are technically getting around twenty-thousand dollars a year. First, in an article from Scholorshipstats.com in statistics from 2015 regarding the amount of scholarship money that was given out was nearly 2.2 billion dollars.

Free education is a huge factor as to why they should not be paid. Research shows that “College athletes don't have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on living and meal plans.” (Source B) Which can add up to a substantial amount. I would say they get free education, in return they represent the school in sports.

How have sports changed to the point where there is serious discussion around paying college athletes? Universities and athletic coaches make millions on the backs of their players. So the question is, are our college athletes properly compensated? After reading both articles by Paul Marx and Warren Hartenstine I have come to the conclusion that college athletes should not be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Many students are fully compensated for tuition, room and board, books and private tutors. These services are valuable in countless ways. They allow students to pursue both their athletic and academic dreams. Further compensating college athletes would lead to an unfair advantage and is unjust to other students.

Here are some statements from former players and officials on college athletes getting paid. These are some current players commenting on if college athletes should be paid or not. Current Seattle Seahawks cornerback (Richard Sherman) makes a big statement and impact on this argument. He says “No, I don’t think college athletes are given enough time to really take advantage of the free education that they’re given, and it’s frustrating because a lot of people get upset with student-athletes and say they’re not focused on school and they’re not taking advantage of the opportunity they’re given. They should get paid. I would love for a regular student to have a student-athlete’s schedule during the season for just one quarter or one semester and show me

The argument of whether or not college athletes should be paid has a definitive answer. The case made by the NCAA is that they are not obliged to pay college athletes and the tuition covered is a reimbursement. Regardless, college athletes devote the majority of their time to the sport and must be paid as they help the NCAA make their annual revenue. The question is, should college athletes be paid? Yes, college athletes should be paid.

The first reason why college athletes should get paid is that colleges / NCAA and coaches have enough money to pay the college athletes. The NCAA/college have many deals that bring billions of dollars in. the coaches also get paid millions of dollars from colleges over many years. For example “ As a result of the basketball game between Indiana and North Carolina in the sixteenth round, the players will not get any financial reward for winning the game. Instead, the coaches will get bonuses.

I have been to many sporting events and I have purchased my share of apparel, gear, and tickets for all different types of college sporting events I have seen the players hard work, determination, and sweat. I have seen the players pain when defeated and joy when winning. This is why I firmly believe that college athletes should be paid a small salary for their dedication. Let's not get crazy, I don't think they should get paid what the professional athletes do, but I think they should get paid enough to help them with their expenses while going to college

College athletic programs receive money from ticket sales, concession stands, media and fans buying apparel. They use these athletes so they could be known and bring more attention to the school. College athletes should be paid because they spend long hours at

College Athletes Should Be Paid! There’s been a heated debate about college athletes getting paid. A college may be a degree-awarding educational institution, a part of a collegiate university, or an institution offering vocational education. The college sport industry is worth over $11 billion dollars. All College athletes needs to be paid because college athletes struggle to make ends meet.

Kids grow up loving to play sports in their free time. They never get paid to play when they are at a young age. They do it for the love of the game and for the need for competition. This is the way that it is in college right now. College athletes compete with all their hearts to be the best they can for their schools. They don’t get paid a cent. It has been a common debate if that is the right way to do it. Should it be that college athletes do not deserve to get paid for playing a sport? It should not be this way. College athletes certainly should get paid to play.

College athletes should be paid because of the hard work, dedication and effort they put into their respective sports. These athletes are a major source of income for their schools and they are not receiving a penny for it. These college athletes deserved to be paid, colleges are using these athletes to get money and they are never given anything but a pat on the back and a good job. College athletes work and train extremely hard to perform at the highest level possible. In most cases, they spend more time training and preparing for their sport than they actually do learning and studying. They put so much on the line to play and they get nothing in return. These college athletes literally make their schools millions of dollars every

College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes