Analysis Of Albert Bandura's Theory On Child Development

On the other hand, this research emphasizes how one’s family background and the surrounding neighborhood as specific contexts that impact individuals psychologically. In my opinion, higher SES families may live in wealthier communities that have better educational resources and environment. At this point, human development tend to be context specific instead of universal. As what we learned in class, poverty brings negative impacts to children, which is the biggest risk for parenting as well. More specifically, parents/caregivers bring direct influences to their children, and the neighborhood is one of the vital factors that impact children simultaneously. (Cole’s lecture, April & May 2017).

Developmental theory, with Piaget as the most prominent theorist, presents the idea that children actively construct knowledge as they manipulate and explore the world around them. Development is seen to take place in broad stages from birth through to adulthood, with each stage characterized by qualitatively distinct ways of thinking. However, some developmental theorists, in contrast to Piaget, place more emphasis on personal, social and emotional development rather than cognitive development and prefer to delay ‘academic’ experiences until later, for instance after the age of seven years in Steiner’s theory.

The lives of children are greatly influenced by the environment they grow up in, and the people they come in contact with. For years, psychologists, researchers, and social workers have studied children, and why they do what they do. All have developed many different perspectives on how to view social problems and the development of individuals.

There are many theorists whose work influences the way we work with children today. There are several distinct groups that the theorists are split into; the behaviourists, such as Bandura, Skinner and Watson, who believed that behaviour influences development, the humanists, like Maslow, who believed that a person’s needs has an impact on their development, the constructivists, which includes Piaget, that believed that a person’s personality is influenced by many factors, such as family, friends, cultures, and the psychoanalysts, like Freud, who thought that the subconscious mind has a control over behaviour.

This paper has presented an argument on how a child’s development is strongly influenced by environmental and cultural influences as well as parenting styles and education. Children begin to learn and experiment with social skills at school, allowing them to learn and understand social skills necessary for later life in life. Children who receive schooling at an early age perform better later in academics. I hope that by teaching in the ways that I described will help me accomplish this. I want my classroom of students to be excited to come to my class everyday to learn something that I hope will impact them for the rest of their lives. I want my classroom to be a very caring environment. I want my students to feel important and smart and to influence them to be the best that they can be. Proverbs 22:6 Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from

Conger, R. D., Ge, X., Elder, G. H., Lorenz, F. O., & Simons, R. L. (1994). Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Development, 65, 541–561.

From the day they are born, children are immersed in a social world. Rapid learning takes place and is supported not only by parents, siblings, teachers and friends but also the important values and beliefs within their culture. All of this provides the foundations for cognitive development. As trainee teachers, it is fundamental that we have a deeper understanding of how children learn and how we can support learning. In order to do this we must first look at some of the theories of learning.

The underlying concepts in the article directly relate to family systems theory. Family systems theory states that all members of a family are reciprocal and impact on one another, all parts of the family change and the family works as a whole instead of a number of smaller sections (Missouri Department of Social Services, 2014). The concept of the interconnected nature of a family is highlighted in this article as it states that children will be impacted by the behaviour and experiences of the parents during early stages of

“In the united states, more than 4 to 5 in 10 marriages end in a divorce, and approximately half of American children are affected by this change in family relationships” ( McDevitt & Ormrod, 2015, p.73). The divorce rate is continuously skyrocketing, and more children are having to learn how to deal with this occurrence. In addition to divorce, there are also many different types of family situations, that are not considered traditional, and these also cause children to go through hardships. For the most part, children who grow up in traditional working households have tended to do better in school and grow developmentally stronger than children in non-traditional household settings due to the hardships and the changes these children are going through.

Thus, they don’t have a healthy family environment and support that they need at this early age. Second, we observed the children’s behavior either aggressive or hesitant. They demonstrated very poor social skills with other teachers and kids. Second, there are many children who suffer verbal, mental and physical abuse. Moreover, it is observed that many children do not have enough parental support. Parents of these children often do not have a stable job and some of them live in shelters. They are often reported as drug/alcohol addicts. Additionally, it is observed that these children have more than two siblings on average. Assessing all these factors, we realized the need of change in children’s routine while they are at the

This has been commonality in children living in poverty, violence, and conditions where families struggle with having enough resources. Thompson believes because of plasticity and other brain and biological developments, the effects can be reversed. Thompson believes a familial and relational intervention can help underprivileged children reduce stress therefore reversing the potential effects of stress. Thompson suggests a “multigenerational” approach will give at-risk children the coping skills and the ability to handle on-going stressful conditions. This multi-generational approach would begin with the child’s immediate family and venture into extended family and caregivers. Many behavioral issues in children are precisely due to familial issues within the household and environmental issues. The article recognizes the nurturing of child can aid in reversing and reducing stress

The development and wellbeing of children is influenced by a number of environmental factors such as their families economic status and the area in which they live in. The Social Ecological Perspective may also be referred to as the social ecological model or a ‘web of relationships’ (K218 learning guide 3, section 3.1) this suggests that a child’s genetics and personality all work together along with the influences from the family. The environments in which the children live and the support provided to families are also influential (Rixon, 2011, p.11). The Social ecological perspective is sometimes explained as a Russian doll effect which highlights how individuals are ingrained within the family, then within the community

Society has its’ own way of affecting people’s life. While society is an important part of one’s life the family structure proves to be a more important factor. When life gets rough family should provide companionship, safety and most of all protection against this cruel world. Having a family unit that is close knit is essential for the development a child. When there are issues in the family the behaviors family members change. Specifically, younger children they tend show aggressive behavior when the family structure is not perfect.

When my two older brothers reached the stage of adolescent, my sister and I fell back behind in middle childhood. Further, it was a stressful time for my family because all four of us did not enjoy the same family activities or interests because we were all on different levels. My parents had to balance different stages within the family, which according to Hutchinson (2015) “involves normative changes and challenging tasks” for my family (p. 351).

In the past, scientists perceived the human brain as a rigid and predictable organ. According to them, based on a person's genetics, the brain developed in a predetermined way, endowing an individual with a level of learning capabilities and baseline intelligence (Stromberg). However, neuroscientists are beginning the recognize the brain as a responsive, constantly evolving organ that can change on several levels due to environmental influences and experiences (Stromberg). A series of studies have emphasized that although the brain can change for the better, it can also change for the worse. A child's brain is especially vulnerable to such effects - and this research has shown that growing up in difficult circumstances can cause damage to a child's cognitive skills that last a lifetime. Without a doubt, family stability holds the greatest impact on a child due to the developmental outcomes and academic failure it ensues.