Analysis Of Alexander Hamilton 's ' The Federalist Papers '

In Federalist 10 by James Madison, he addresses key issues like factions and democracy, all while focusing on the usefulness of the Constitution and the necessity of a strong central government, to defend his Federalist ideology. Personally, I agree with the foundation of his arguments, especially on the topic of forms of government, as well as the role of representation in our government.

Gordon sums up the American economic history in six chapters of his book. He explains that the United States had taken on huge debts following to the American Revolution. In order to pay such debts back, Hamilton created the federal bank and convinced the Congress to issue federal bonds. This way the federal government could make interest payments on time, build credit and keep the inflation from rising. Hamilton thought that the national debt could be a useful tool in order to create capital for the new industries. In his book, Gordon also recalls that soon after the 1812 War the seventh President of the United States cleared the government debts thanks to surpluses deriving from high tariffs. Then, he explains that the introduction of the first Federal income tax in America during the Civil Was turned out to be crucial in order to investigate how to distribute the tax

30, Alexander Hamilton writes all about taxes and taxation in this essay. He has much to say about taxes and the good that they are doing in shaping the nation. He believes that the power to collect taxes when necessary is extremely important for the governmental success. Recently, someone tried to pick apart this essay and state that some senators had the power to limit that excessive amount of spending that the goverment has been up to lately. However, this essay came back into play and proved that idea wrong. Everything was set back into place because of Hamilton's brilliant

The Federalist Papers Ten and Fifty-One were the ideal papers written by Madison to support th¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬e ratification of the Constitution. Out of all the federalist papers, these are two of the most important federalist papers. So what were the federalist papers? They were 85 essays written by three gentlemen: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay that explained particular provisions of the Constitution in detail. Alexander Hamilton goes on to be the first treasury secretary, James Madison goes on to be the fourth president and John Jay the first chief justice in US history. So what was the purpose of these papers? Well, they were written to gain support for the US Constitution, especially in New York. While many people might see it as inevitable, the Constitution was a revolutionary step. Because of the revolutionary nature of the new constitution, arguments were necessary to rationalize it. Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York were the states critical to the success or failure of the Constitution. Of these four states, New York by far was the state where the success of the constitution was in the most doubt. Quickly, Alexander Hamilton decided that a massive propaganda campaign was necessary in New York, more than in any other state. So with the help of James Madison and John Jay, he published several essays in different newspapers in New York. There is really little

Out of all the obstacles that the federalists had faced, the economy was, by far, the most problematic and the most difficult to find a solution for all parties. The country was not in a very stable position because of the recent crises like the whisky rebellion, or money-producing ideas such as bonds. Hamilton, Madison, and Jefferson played major roles in establishing the economy of the United States at the time, and also had a large role in the development of today’s government and economy. Without the ideas of these men, the United States economy may have the same problems today that the federalists faced then. And in the end, even though the idea of a national bank was redundant, that is what removed the United States from

The Articles of Confederation had a weak central government. Alexander Hamilton believed that the more powerful state governments would take over. In Federalist Paper 16, he states that the death of the confederacy would be the result of the lack of a large national defense. Hamilton says the government should have control over the individual as well as the states so that the government can protect the “hopes and fears” of the individuals. Government is important to the unity of its country, and Hamilton claims that no government can always avoid or control those who will be disorderly, but it would be “vain to hope to guard against events too mighty for human foresight or precaution, and it would be idle to object to a government because it

Few Americans are aware of the profound impact Alexander Hamilton had on our nation’s development with his creation of multiple, important institutions. Hamilton, a true Founding Father of our nation, is primarily accountable for the design and establishment of Federal institutions, especially for the financial system which helped form the states into a nation. These creations of his helped put this nation on its path toward an industrial economy. Hamilton wanted a manufacturing economy founded on financial principles. He played a key role in shaping President George Washington’s foreign policy based on American self-interest.

In the summer of 1798, the newly established United States was almost about to experience war with France. Many people felt concerned about America’s stability and security due to their invincible enemies in France as well as the existing political chaos in their own government. In hope of reinforcing America during the grueling war to come and weakening the power of political rivals, known as the Democratic-Republicans, the Federalist-controlled Congress passed a series of four laws known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. Many political individuals became quite outraged of the establishment of these four laws. Albert Gallatin, a Democratic-Republican congressman of Pennsylvania, conducted a speech to the United States House of Representatives regarding the proposal of the laws.

Upon its founding in 1776 the United States has undergone two constitutions, the first being the Articles of Confederation, with the second being our modern Constitution. The Articles of Confederation was adopted on November 15, 1777 and ran the country until June 21, 1788; the date our constitution was ratified. The intentions for our constitutions, according to our Founding Fathers, was to limit and govern the powers of those who limit and govern the state itself.

He believed in the growth of a strong government and the Constitution. This would allow more government control of the people. He thought of a system run by the men of the aristocracy that was political. Alexander Hamilton felt like that if a government was supposed be ran in good conditions, it had to be ran by more educated and wealthy people. The position of the new government at the time was to encourage enterprise of economics. Through the office of Secretary of the Treasury, he was allowed to bring up the idea of a national bank. This government owned and ran the bank that would help the American people recover from the Revolutionary War, help them regulate currency, and help control the economy in America. During the discussion of this bill for a National Bank, the issue of implied powers concerning the Constitution came up and the principle of powers was the government had the right to make laws necessary and proper to help the people of America. Hamilton thought these powers were needed to run a good and strong government because it would protect the people from corrupting anything. He thought that the only way for a government to stay stable is for it to be allowed the ability to change and make any adjustments it needed. In 1791, the bill for the starting of a national bank was passed, but the only problem with the issue of powers was that no one knew exactly where the government would stop. In 1798, the government practiced into the policy of powers with the Sedition Act. The Sedition Act stopped people and it showed that the policy of powers of the government could very well be taken too far with

Though both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson served as members of President Washington’s cabinet, the two held very different views on the newly founded U.S. government, interpretation of its constitution, and the role of the “masses” in that government. These conflicting views would develop in two political parties, the Federalists led by Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Jefferson. Although both political parties presented enticing aspects, Hamilton’s views were much more reasonable and fruitful when compared Jefferson’s views; idealistic and too strict in reference to the constitution.

The Washington administration faced many challenges, the Articles of confederation had many flaws which brought problems. The new nation government was thought to be weak, one reason being that the articles of confederation only gave a one-house legislature. Which meant that the 13 states had only one vote on any lawmaking rules and in order for it to pass at least 9 had to be for it. The nation’s debt was also a challenge faced but federalist Alexander Hamilton used his intelligence to use it to his advantage and to strengthen the power of the federal government. Hamilton came up with “Report on the public credit”

Alexander hamilton proposed that the new government pay off national debt. Hamilton believed that the federal payment of states debt would give the states a strong interest in national government. Congress later agreed to the first part of his plan but rejected the rest because it would make speculators rich. To win support, hamilton compromised.

In the American nation, he developed love of regulation, efficiency and organization. Hamilton strongly showed that America must possess credit for the development of government operations, trade, industry and business activities. He stressed the importance of the central government to take over the debts of the state that were unpaid in the Revolutionary period (Scott, 2008). The central government was endorsed by the American Constitution to charge and collect taxes as well as pay liabilities (Robertson, 2005). Such operations can be professionally handled by a central bank. Therefore, Hamilton was characterized by thinking creatively and critically as he observed the potential of the trade industry’s immense power (Pancake, 1974).

The national debt has always been a major issue in and for the United States. In the past the nation was faced with this deficit as they were required to borrow money from foreign nations and its citizens as the government needed money to build up its empire. The nation obtained money from its citizens in the form of bonds which the government promised to pay back. Distrust accumulated when the government was unable to pay these bonds back. When Alexander Hamilton was appointed Secretary of the Treasury, he composed a resolution to the debt issue. This resolution, according to our textbook was to develop a more commercial/industrial economy as opposed to the agricultural based economy that was prevalent at the time. Hamilton viewed the debt as an asset. To further elaborate on Hamilton’s plan; he decided to fund debts by selling bonds which paid annual interest to holders, in order to pay these bonds Hamilton also proposed new tariffs and excise taxes. Hamilton’s plan would benefit the economy in 3 essential ways, by establishing a sense of economic credibility, earning support from wealthy citizens which would aid stability issues and benefit the nation as a whole in the future, and entice investors; similar to buying support from wealthy citizens would aid the nation as investors could build/fund utilities and resources for the nation. Hamilton’s plan would also redistribute wealth from farmers to merchants and from the South to the North. Naturally, Hamilton’s plan was